← Back to Stories

IOC bans transgender women and DSD athletes from female Olympic events via new SRY gene testing policy

2 hours ago5 articles from 2 sources

Consensus Summary

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has implemented a sweeping policy banning transgender women and athletes with differences in sex development (DSD) from competing in female Olympic events starting with the 2028 Los Angeles Games. The decision mandates a one-time SRY gene test to determine biological sex, reversing the IOC’s 2021 framework that allowed transgender inclusion. Kirsty Coventry, elected IOC president in March 2024, led the shift, citing scientific evidence of male performance advantages—ranging from 10-12% in endurance events to over 100% in explosive power sports—even after hormone treatment. The policy applies only to elite sport and was influenced by controversies like Imane Khelif’s 2024 Paris Olympics victory, as well as U.S. President Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order banning transgender athletes from women’s sports. While the IOC claims the rules ensure fairness and safety, human rights groups and scientific experts criticize the policy as discriminatory, arbitrary, and unsupported by current research. The move has sparked global debate, with some athletes and organizations supporting the change for clarity in competition, while others warn it could undermine gender equality and athlete well-being.

✓ Verified by 2+ sources

Key details reported by multiple sources:

  • The IOC banned transgender women and athletes with differences in sex development (DSD) from competing in female Olympic events starting with the 2028 Los Angeles Games.
  • The new policy mandates a one-time SRY gene screening test (via saliva, cheek swab, or blood) to determine biological sex for female category eligibility at the Olympics.
  • Kirsty Coventry was elected IOC president in March 2024 and has led the policy shift, stating 'it would not be fair for biological males to compete in the female category' (Guardian, ABC, ABC).
  • The IOC’s 10-page document cites a 10-12% male performance advantage in most running/swimming events and a >100% advantage in explosive power events (e.g., lifting, punching) for athletes with male puberty (Guardian, Guardian).
  • Laurel Hubbard (New Zealand) was the first transgender woman to compete at the Olympics (Tokyo 2021) under the previous IOC framework (Guardian, ABC, ABC).
  • The policy applies only to elite Olympic sport and does not affect grassroots or recreational sports (Guardian, ABC, ABC).
  • The IOC’s new rules were developed after a survey of 1,100 athletes, with a majority of female Olympians supporting the change (Guardian).
  • Donald Trump’s 2025 executive order banning transgender athletes from U.S. women’s sports was cited as influencing the IOC’s decision (Guardian, ABC, Guardian).
  • The IOC’s 2021 Framework on Fairness, Inclusion, and Non-Discrimination was reversed by the new policy (Guardian, Guardian).
  • The SRY gene test is described as 'unintrusive' compared to historical sex testing methods (Guardian, ABC, ABC).
  • Imane Khelif (Algeria) and Caster Semenya (South Africa) were high-profile DSD athletes who won Olympic medals in women’s events (Guardian, ABC)

Points of Difference

Details reported by only one source:

GUARDIAN_ARTICLE_1
  • The IOC’s U-turn was described as 'one of the most astonishing U-turns from a governing body in modern times' with 'tightly worded pages' reversing prior guidance.
  • The policy shift was linked to the 2024 Paris Olympics women’s boxing controversy involving Imane Khelif’s DSD status, where IOC executive director Christophe Dubi admitted the issue 'would be addressed'.
  • The IOC was 'pushing at an open door' as most sports federations had privately urged similar policies for years.
  • The policy document emphasizes that 'the Olympic Movement has a compelling interest in having a sex-based female category' for fairness, safety, and integrity.
  • The Guardian notes that the IOC’s decision was influenced by 'broad agreement' that transgender women and DSD athletes retain advantages from male puberty even after hormone treatment.
GUARDIAN_ARTICLE_2
  • The IOC’s 10-page document explicitly states 'XY transgender athletes and athletes with XY-DSD typically have testes/testicles and testosterone levels in the male range'.
  • The policy applies to 'elite individual and team sports' and aims to 'protect the fairness and safety of women’s sport'.
  • Kirsty Coventry emphasized that 'every athlete must be treated with dignity and respect' and that testing would be 'only once in their lifetime'.
  • The document highlights that 'the male performance advantage can be greater than 100% in events that involve explosive power, eg in collision, lifting and punching sports'.
ABC_ARTICLE_3
  • The Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) offered support to affected athletes, including counselling and 'strict guidelines around confidentiality and athlete wellbeing'.
  • A systematic review of 52 studies (6,485 participants) published in the *British Journal of Sports Medicine* found 'transgender women exhibited higher lean mass than cisgender women, but their physical fitness was comparable'—described as 'low certainty' evidence.
  • Monash human rights law expert Paula Gerber stated the IOC’s policy 'contravenes the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights' and is 'not surprising given US President Donald Trump’s anti-trans agenda'.
  • The AOC president Ian Chesterman noted the policy 'demonstrates a commitment to fairness, safety and integrity in Olympic competition, all of which are fundamental principles of the Olympic movement'.
  • The policy could breach Australia’s *Sex Discrimination Act*, *National Integrity Framework*, and *Elite Youth Athlete Guidelines* according to human rights lawyer Nikki Dryden.
GUARDIAN_ARTICLE_4
  • Over 100 human rights, sports, and scientific groups—including the United Nations—criticized the IOC’s guidelines as 'a blunt and discriminatory response that is not supported by science and violates international human rights law'.
  • The IOC’s new committee has not publicly shared the scientific data behind the policy, and Dr Ada Cheung (University of Melbourne) called the SRY gene test 'unreliable and reductive'.
  • The Guardian notes that 'the best available data shows transgender women receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy are not meaningfully different from cisgender women in key performance-related measures' (e.g., muscle mass, strength).
  • The policy was described as a 'return to practices that were abandoned decades ago for good reason' (e.g., mandatory sex testing in 1999).
  • The IOC’s decision was framed as reversing its own 2021 *Framework on Fairness, Inclusion, and Non-Discrimination*, which was 'informed by extensive consultation and research'.
ABC_ARTICLE_5
  • The ABC emphasized that the policy 'has no retroactive power and has no impact on grassroots or amateur sports'.
  • The article explicitly states the policy 'effectively bans transgender athletes from participating in women’s events' at the Olympics.
  • The ABC highlighted that the IOC’s previous stance was to 'decline to apply any universal rule on transgender participation' until Kirsty Coventry’s election.

Contradictions

Conflicting information between sources:

  • Guardian Article 1 states the IOC was 'pushing at an open door' as sports federations had privately urged similar policies, while Guardian Article 4 claims the IOC’s new policy is 'not supported by science' and 'violates international human rights law'.
  • ABC Article 3 reports that a *British Journal of Sports Medicine* review found transgender women have 'comparable' physical fitness to cisgender women, contradicting the IOC’s claim in its 10-page document that they retain a 'performance advantage' in all sports.
  • Guardian Article 4 cites Dr Ada Cheung stating the SRY gene test is 'unreliable and reductive,' while the IOC and ABC sources describe it as 'unintrusive' and 'highly accurate'.
  • ABC Article 3 notes that the policy could breach Australia’s *Sex Discrimination Act*, but the AOC (ABC Article 3) and ABC Article 5 do not provide evidence of legal challenges or enforcement actions against the policy.
  • Guardian Article 1 mentions that 'many in the IOC had huge sympathy for Imane Khelif,' while Guardian Article 2 and ABC sources frame the policy as a blanket ban without acknowledging individual cases like Khelif’s.

Source Articles

GUARDIAN

From Laurel Hubbard to sex testing in five years: why the Olympics U-turned on transgender rules | Sean Ingle

The IOC’s shift in position on trans women in elite sports is seismic, but new president Kirsty Coventry is reflecting a changed political climate By any measure, it amounts to one of the most astonis...

GUARDIAN

Human rights experts raise concerns over Olympics transgender women athlete ban

Critics say new IOC guidelines violate fundamental human rights AOC backs new rules but accepts issue is ‘challenging and complex’ Over 100 human rights, sports and scientific groups , including the U...

GUARDIAN

Transgender women athletes banned from female events at Olympics by IOC

DSD athletes also face exclusion from future Olympics IOC says move will protect ‘fairness and safety’ The International Olympic Committee has banned transgender women and DSD athletes from the female...

ABC

Trans women athletes banned from competing in female Olympic events

Under changes announced by the International Olympic Committee, the gender of athletes will be determined by a one-time gene-screening test....

ABC

AOC backs Olympic transgender rules despite human rights concerns

The Australian Olympic Committee supports new guidelines for transgender participation at the Olympic Games, as human rights experts and LGBTQIA+ advocates raise alarm bells....