Australian study links vaping to lung and oral cancer risk
Consensus Summary
An Australian review led by the University of New South Wales concluded that nicotine vapes likely cause lung and oral cancer, marking a shift from prior assumptions that they were safer than smoking. The study, published in Carcinogenesis, analyzed human biomarkers, animal studies, and case reportsâincluding a 19-year-old with vaping-related oral cancerâwhile acknowledging long-term epidemiological data remains limited. Both sources agree black market vapes often mislabel nicotine content and contain harmful chemicals like formaldehyde and heavy metals. However, the Guardian downplays direct comparisons to smokingâs harm, while ABC underscores vapesâ addictive potential and enforcement gaps in Australiaâs pharmacy-only sales law. Experts warn regulators must act urgently, citing parallels to the decades-long delay in proving smokingâs cancer link, though ABC notes definitive proof for vaping may take even longer. Public health researchers stress the need to curb youth access while providing regulated pathways for smokers to quit.
â Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- A new Australian review led by researchers from the University of New South Wales (UNSW) found nicotine-containing vapes are likely to cause lung and oral cancers, published between 2017 and 2025.
- The review analyzed mouse studies, human biomarker studies (oxidative stress, epigenetic change, inflammation), and case reports, including a 19-year-old man with oral cancer after extensive vaping.
- Australiaâs federal government strengthened vaping legislation in 2024 to restrict sales to pharmacies for smoking cessation or nicotine dependence management only.
- Black market vapes in Australia often contain nicotine despite labels claiming otherwise, according to Alexander Larcombe of Curtin University.
- The study was published in the journal Carcinogenesis and co-authored by Bernard Stewart and Freddy Sitas, both from UNSW.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Lead author Bernard Stewart noted there is still no epidemiological link between vaping and cancer but compared the timeline to smoking research, suggesting definitive proof may take decades.
- Becky Freeman (University of Sydney) emphasized the need to minimize future harm by supporting people to quit vaping and stemming supply, citing the long wait for smoking-cancer proof.
- Alexander Larcombe highlighted that nicotine-free vapes contain harmful substances like volatile organic compounds (formaldehyde, acrolein), metals (nickel, chromium), and cytotoxic flavorings (cinnamaldehyde).
- The ABC reported the Federal Department of Health did not respond to inquiries about vape restrictions before deadline.
- The Guardian quoted Calvin Cochran (University of Otago) warning that dismissing early vaping research risks repeating the delay in recognizing smokingâs cancer risks, citing 8,000 studies for smokingâs definitive link.
- Stephen Duffy (Queen Mary University London) stated it would be an overinterpretation to claim vaping is as harmful as smoking due to lack of combustion products, though he acknowledged carcinogenic risks.
- The Guardian emphasized the reviewâs focus on biological changes (DNA damage, inflammation) linked to cancer, rather than definitive incidence rates.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- ABC notes Dr Stewart said there is still no epidemiological link between vaping and cancer, while the Guardian frames the review as providing 'strong evidence' that vapes are likely to cause cancer.
- The Guardian quotes Stephen Duffy as saying vaping is not as harmful as smoking due to absence of combustion products, but ABCâs Larcombe and Edwards both describe vapes as 'almost certain to be harmful' regardless of nicotine content.
- ABC highlights that many vapers end up in 'dual use limbo' (using both vapes and cigarettes), while the Guardian does not mention this specific behavioral pattern.
- The Guardian does not reference the 19-year-old case study of oral cancer from vaping mentioned in ABCâs article.
- ABC emphasizes the need for stronger enforcement of Australiaâs vape laws, while the Guardian focuses more on regulatory action to protect children and non-smokers.
Source Articles
Vaping likely to cause lung and oral cancer, Australian researchers find in new review of evidence
âThere is no doubt that the cells and tissues of the oral cavity, the mouth and the lungs are altered by inhalation from e-cigarettes,â academic says Get our breaking news email , free app or daily ne...
Vaping likely to cause cancer, new Australian review of evidence finds
Nicotine-based vapes are likely to cause lung and oral cancer, according to a new review of evidence. Experts say there needs to be tougher enforcement of vape laws in Australia....