← Back to Stories

Australian study links vaping to lung and oral cancer risk

3 hours ago2 articles from 2 sources

Consensus Summary

Australian researchers from the University of New South Wales published a comprehensive review concluding that nicotine vapes likely cause lung and oral cancer, based on animal studies, human biomarkers, and case reports. The findings, spanning 2017–2025, identified oxidative stress, DNA damage, and inflammation as pre-cancerous changes linked to vaping, though no definitive epidemiological link exists yet. Both sources agree Australia’s 2024 pharmacy-only vape sales law targets smoking cessation but acknowledge black market vapes—often mislabeled—pose unregulated risks. Experts warn against assuming vaping is safer than smoking, with one study noting harmful chemicals in nicotine-free products. While The Guardian cautioned against equating vaping’s harm to smoking, ABC’s researchers emphasized the urgency of enforcement and public awareness, framing vaping as a high-risk behavior without proven cessation benefits. Contradictions arise in framing the evidence’s certainty, with ABC highlighting cautionary timelines and The Guardian stressing carcinogenic mechanisms, though both urge regulatory action to protect nonsmokers and children.

✓ Verified by 2+ sources

Key details reported by multiple sources:

  • A new review led by researchers from the University of New South Wales (UNSW) found nicotine-containing vapes are likely to cause lung and oral cancers, based on evidence from 2017–2025.
  • The review analyzed mouse studies, human biomarker studies (oxidative stress, epigenetic changes, inflammation), and case reports, including a 19-year-old man with oral cancer linked to vaping.
  • Australia’s federal government in 2024 restricted vape sales to pharmacies for smoking cessation or nicotine dependence management only.
  • Black market vapes in Australia often contain nicotine despite misleading labels, according to Alexander Larcombe (Curtin University) and ABC’s reporting.
  • The review did not establish a definitive epidemiological link between vaping and cancer but identified biological markers (DNA damage, inflammation) associated with cancer risk.

Points of Difference

Details reported by only one source:

ABC News
  • Lead author Bernard Stewart noted that definitive proof of vaping causing cancer may take decades, comparing it to the 100-year timeline for smoking.
  • Becky Freeman (University of Sydney) emphasized the need to minimize future harm by supporting quit-vaping efforts and restricting supply, citing enforcement gaps in Australia’s laws.
  • Alexander Larcombe (Curtin University) highlighted that nicotine-free vapes still contain harmful substances like formaldehyde, acrolein, and cytotoxic flavorings.
  • The ABC reported the Federal Department of Health did not respond to inquiries about vape restrictions before deadline.
THEGUARDIAN
  • The study was published in the journal *Carcinogenesis* on Tuesday, with co-author Adjunct Prof Bernard Stewart citing DNA damage and inflammation as early warning signs.
  • Calvin Cochran (University of Otago) warned of the risk of dismissing vaping research like earlier smoking warnings, comparing it to the 8,000 studies needed to prove smoking’s link to lung cancer.
  • Prof Stephen Duffy (Queen Mary University London) cautioned against overinterpreting the research, noting vaping lacks combustion-related carcinogens found in smoking.
  • The Guardian explicitly stated the review did not measure cancer incidence but assessed pre-carcinogenic biological changes.

Contradictions

Conflicting information between sources:

  • ABC reported Dr Stewart said 'there is still no epidemiological link' between vaping and cancer, while The Guardian framed the review as finding 'likely' cancer risk without definitive numbers.
  • The Guardian quoted Prof Stephen Duffy as saying vaping is 'not as harmful as smoking' due to absence of combustion products, but ABC’s Alexander Larcombe stated 'nothing inhaled into the lungs other than fresh air is likely to be completely OK'.
  • ABC emphasized Dr Stewart’s caution that vaping as a smoking cessation tool is 'not established as successful,' while The Guardian’s Freddy Sitas implied regulators should act despite inconclusive quit-vaping evidence.
  • The Guardian did not mention the 19-year-old vaping-linked oral cancer case report highlighted by ABC, though both sources cited case studies.
  • ABC included a direct quote from Dr Stewart comparing vaping’s timeline to smoking’s 100-year proof, while The Guardian focused on Cochran’s analogy of dismissing warnings like early smoking research.

Source Articles

ABC

Vaping likely to cause cancer, new Australian review of evidence finds

Nicotine-based vapes are likely to cause lung and oral cancer, according to a new review of evidence. Experts say there needs to be tougher enforcement of vape laws in Australia....

Yesterday
GUARDIAN

Vaping likely to cause lung and oral cancer, Australian researchers find in new review of evidence

‘There is no doubt that the cells and tissues of the oral cavity, the mouth and the lungs are altered by inhalation from e-cigarettes,’ academic says Get our breaking news email , free app or daily ne...

Yesterday