Australian billionaire's waste-to-energy incinerator plan in Fiji sparks backlash
Consensus Summary
Australian billionaire Ian Malouf and his business partner Rob Cromb are proposing a $630–900 million waste-to-energy incinerator in Fiji, near the tourist hub of Nadi, to burn 900,000 tonnes of waste annually and generate up to 80 megawatts of power. The project has sparked widespread opposition from local villagers, traditional chiefs, and Fiji’s UN ambassador, who call it 'waste colonialism' and warn of environmental harm, including air pollution and contamination of the food chain. Both sources agree the plan risks damaging Fiji’s eco-tourism industry and violates international waste export conventions like the Basel and Waigani agreements. While supporters argue it could reduce landfill methane emissions and cut Fiji’s reliance on diesel, critics say it prioritizes Australia’s waste disposal over Fiji’s sovereignty and heritage. The Fiji government is reviewing the proposal amid public backlash, with over 2,000 submissions opposing the project.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The proposed waste-to-energy incinerator in Fiji is backed by Australian billionaire Ian Malouf and his business partner Rob Cromb (Kookai fashion label).
- The project is estimated to cost $630 million (Guardian) or $900 million (ABC), with a capacity to burn 900,000 tonnes of non-recyclable waste annually.
- The incinerator is proposed to be built within 15 km (9 miles) of Fiji’s tourism gateway Nadi, near the Vuda coast.
- The project would generate up to 80 megawatts of power annually, potentially meeting 40-45% of Fiji’s electricity needs.
- The incinerator would burn waste at over 850 degrees Celsius, producing steam for electricity and some residual ash for road base or landfill.
- Fiji’s UN Ambassador Filipo Tarakinikini called the project 'waste colonialism' and warned it would turn Fiji into the 'Pacific’s ashtray'.
- Local villagers, including traditional landowner Inoke Tora and the Tui Vuda (Paramount Chief of Vuda), oppose the project, citing environmental risks and threats to tourism.
- The project is under review by Fiji’s government, with public consultations closed and 2,005+ people having submitted petitions or written submissions.
- The Basel Convention (1989) and Waigani Convention (1998) prohibit hazardous waste exports from Australia to Pacific Island nations like Fiji.
- The project would include a deep-water port to service the incinerator, with concerns raised about emissions from shipping waste from Australia.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The promotional video for the facility was largely AI-generated, according to ABC reporting.
- The ABC noted that the project’s environmental impact assessment received 207 written submissions by April 20, 2026.
- Former Flying Fijian Randall Kamea explicitly called the project 'waste colonialism' and linked it to the Basel and Waigani Conventions.
- The ABC reported that the incinerator would burn waste at over 850 degrees Celsius, turning rubbish into steam to power wind turbines.
- The ABC mentioned a proposed 500-room resort in the same area, which local chiefs prefer over the incinerator.
- Professor Ray Wills from the University of Western Australia criticized the project, stating Fiji could better meet energy needs with solar farms.
- The ABC noted that the Australian government has no jurisdiction over the facility and that unsorted household waste is classified as hazardous, preventing export permits.
- The Guardian reported the project’s cost as $630 million, with an environmental impact statement showing it would raise Fiji’s national emissions by 25%.
- The Guardian included a quote from Stephen Bali, former Sydney mayor, who opposed a similar incinerator in Australia and urged Fiji to seek independent scientific data.
- The Guardian mentioned that Malouf previously tried to build a similar incinerator in Sydney, which was rejected in 2018 due to health risks.
- The Guardian reported that Cromb held community meetings with villagers amid backlash, stating concerns about environmental safety and transparency were 'valid and being taken seriously'.
- The Guardian included a quote from Fiji’s tourism minister Vilame Gavoka, who said the incinerator could jeopardize tourism in Nadi.
- The Guardian mentioned that the project would feed on both local waste and waste shipped from Australia and across the region, despite Cromb’s denial of importing overseas waste.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The Guardian reports the project costs $630 million, while the ABC reports it costs $900 million.
- The Guardian states the incinerator would raise Fiji’s national emissions by 25%, but the ABC does not mention this specific figure.
- The Guardian notes that Cromb’s statement to the Guardian denies importing overseas waste, while the ABC reports Cromb told the ABC the plant would primarily handle Fiji’s domestic waste but acknowledges uncertainty in waste volume data.
- The Guardian mentions Malouf’s past failed attempt to build a similar incinerator in Sydney, which the ABC does not reference.
- The ABC states the Australian government has no jurisdiction over the facility, while the Guardian does not explicitly mention this point.
Source Articles
‘Pacific ashtray’: Australian billionaire’s plan to ship and burn waste in Fiji condemned by villagers
After his project got rejected in Sydney, a rubbish disposal magnate now hopes to build a $630m port and waste incinerator near a tourist gateway city An Australian billionaire’s plan to burn rubbish for energy in Fiji amounts to “waste colonialism” and risks spoiling a “beach paradise”, villagers and the Pacific country’s UN ambassador have said. Traditional landowner Inoke Tora boarded a bus to the capital, Suva, on Tuesday with a petition from villagers opposing the $630m waste-to-energy inci
Australian billionaire's waste-to-energy plan labelled 'waste colonialism'
The controversial project would see waste burned to create energy in Fiji to reduce the country's reliance on fossil fuels, but locals and environmentalists are not happy.