Australia strengthens social media ban for under-16s amid global crackdowns
Consensus Summary
Australia is strengthening its social media ban for under-16s after research showed over 80% of banned teens continued using platforms like TikTok and Instagram three months post-ban. The government will double fines to $99 million and expand the eSafety Commissioner’s powers to compel compliance from tech companies, which critics accuse of doing the 'bare minimum.' Global momentum for similar bans is growing, with the UK, France, Indonesia, and Malaysia adopting or planning restrictions, though effectiveness remains debated. Studies indicate age verification checks are often weak, with teens bypassing rules via fake accounts or VPNs. While some governments see bans as a symbolic step, others like Italy and Amnesty International argue they are ineffective without broader regulation or education. Legal challenges, such as a California case holding Meta liable for addictive design, have intensified scrutiny of tech platforms, but enforcement gaps persist.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- Australia’s social media ban for under-16s began on December 10, 2025, targeting platforms including TikTok, Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, Snapchat, X, Twitch, Kick, and Reddit.
- More than 4.7 million (or 5 million) accounts identified as belonging to Australians under 16 have been removed, deactivated, or restricted since the ban began.
- A University of Newcastle study of 408 adolescents aged 12–17 found that over 80% (or 85%) of under-16s continued using social media three months after the ban, with limited early impact on reducing usage.
- The eSafety Commissioner, Julie Inman Grant, has stated that current legislation has 'very thin scaffolding' and lacks 'potent powers' to enforce compliance.
- The Australian government plans to double fines for breaches of the social media ban from $49.5 million to $99 million, aligning with competition and consumer law penalties.
- The UK government announced plans for a similar social media ban for under-16s, set to begin in early 2027, with stronger age verification checks than Australia’s model.
- Australia’s proposed reforms will strengthen the eSafety Commissioner’s powers to compel social media companies and third parties (e.g., age verification providers) to provide evidence of compliance efforts.
- Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has repeatedly stated that 'big tech' companies are 'not doing enough' to comply with the ban, calling them 'unaccountable' and emphasizing the need for Australian regulation.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Prime Minister Albanese mentioned in Question Time that a 'digital duty of care' requiring platforms to prevent foreseeable harms (e.g., algorithmic radicalization) is being considered as part of broader reforms.
- Albanese cited a case where algorithms could push users from mainstream discussions to 'Nazi-level propaganda with calls for violence' over time.
- The eSafety Commissioner’s investigation is currently focused on Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube for potential non-compliance.
- Communications Minister Anika Wells accused tech companies of using 'tricks straight out of the big tech playbook' to minimize compliance efforts.
- Albanese referenced that 16 other countries have followed Australia’s social media ban model, positioning it as a global leader.
- The UK’s proposed ban includes restrictions on livestreaming and communicating with strangers on gaming platforms like Roblox, going beyond Australia’s model.
- Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni dismissed social media bans as ineffective, stating they can be 'easily circumvented' and questioning their utility.
- India and the US remain outliers, with no sweeping bans implemented, though some US states (e.g., Florida, Utah) have introduced partial restrictions.
- A landmark California case found Meta and YouTube liable for designing addictive products that harmed a young user, with lawyers describing it as 'engineering of addiction'.
- China’s restrictions include a weekday ban on online gaming for minors and time limits on platforms like Douyin (TikTok’s Chinese version).
- Turkey’s proposed ban for under-15s raised concerns about potential government-run online portals, sparking comparisons to past internet restrictions.
- Amnesty International called Australia’s ban an 'ineffective quick fix' and urged better regulation, stronger data protection, and platform design reforms instead.
- Canada’s ban includes exemptions for companies demonstrating robust policies to protect users from harmful content.
- Spain’s proposed ban would make social media executives personally accountable for hate speech on their platforms.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The ABC states that 'no fines have been issued' despite apparent non-compliance by tech companies, while the Guardian does not explicitly mention fines but implies enforcement challenges through research findings.
- The Guardian reports that only 5% of 12–13-year-olds and 11% of 14–15-year-olds were asked to provide official ID for age verification, while the ABC does not specify these exact percentages but notes 'inadequate age verification checks'.
- The Guardian suggests the Australian ban may be more effective for children under 8, while the ABC does not explicitly address this age group’s effectiveness in its coverage.
- The Guardian cites a UK government spokesperson dismissing circumvention as irrelevant ('they get around other laws too'), while Italy’s Prime Minister Meloni explicitly called bans 'easily circumvented' and ineffective.
- The ABC highlights Australia’s ban as a 'priority' and 'world-leading,' while the Guardian frames it as part of a 'global reckoning' with mixed effectiveness and unintended consequences.
Source Articles
Australia considers strengthening social media ban
Australia will strengthen its social media ban for young people as a priority amid concerns the powers behind the world-first laws are not strong enough.
Four in five under-16s in Australia using social media despite ban, study shows
Experts say law not enough to stop children accessing harmful content online and more ‘convincing strategy is required’ More than 80% of under-16s in Australia said they were still using social media three months after legislation banning them from it came into force, research shows. Australia is the first country to ban social media for children. Since December 2025, under-16s have been prohibited from having accounts with many social media platforms including TikTok, X, Facebook, Instagram, Yo
Social media bans go global: big tech faces a reckoning after Australia’s crackdown
As a host of countries move to rein in social media use by children, could this be technology’s big tobacco moment? Continue reading...
Australia to double penalty for social media ban breaches to $99m as tech giants accused of ‘not doing enough’
Prime minister Anthony Albanese says too many children still on platforms but he is ‘heartened’ by world-leading law Social media bans go global: big tech faces a reckoning after Australia’s crackdown Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast The federal government will double the penalty for breaches of Australia’s youth social media ban to $99m, arguing tech companies are “not doing enough” to keep children off harmful social media sites. And the eSafety commissioner, now in
Labor unveils new powers to strengthen social media ban
Six months into Australia's world-first social media ban for under-16s, the federal government has announced tougher laws that it says will hold big tech to account and keep kids safe online.