US jury rules Meta and Google liable for social media addiction harms to youth
Consensus Summary
A US jury in Los Angeles ruled on June 26, 2024, that Meta (Instagram/Facebook) and Google (YouTube) were liable for negligence in a landmark social media addiction lawsuit, awarding the 20-year-old plaintiff $3 million in compensatory damages ($4.3 million total including punitive). The plaintiff, who began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at nine, testified that her addiction worsened her mental health, leading to depression, self-harm, and diagnoses of body dysmorphic disorder and social phobia by age 13. The jury found both companies knew or should have known their platforms posed dangers to minors and failed to warn users adequately, with Meta assigned 70% of responsibility. This 'bellwether' case could influence thousands of pending lawsuits and marks the first time Meta and Google have been found liable for harm caused by their platforms' design. The verdict follows a separate New Mexico ruling where Meta was ordered to pay $375 million for misleading users about platform safety and enabling child exploitation. Both companies plan to appeal, while Australian law firms are investigating potential cases based on the US ruling, with the Australian government extending its under-16 social media ban to include platforms with addictive features like infinite scroll and notifications. The case highlights ongoing scrutiny of tech companies' role in youth mental health crises, with critics arguing platforms were deliberately designed to be addictive.
â Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- A US jury in Los Angeles found Meta (parent of Instagram/Facebook) and Google (parent of YouTube) liable for damages in a social media addiction lawsuit on June 26, 2024.
- The plaintiff, a 20-year-old woman (referred to as KGM or Kaley GM in court), began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at age nine, alleging addiction worsened her mental health.
- The jury awarded the plaintiff $3 million in compensatory damages ($4.3 million total including punitive), with Meta assigned 70% ($2.1 million) and Google 30% ($900,000).
- The jury found both companies negligent in platform design, knowing or should have known their services posed dangers to minors, and failed to warn users adequately.
- The case is a 'bellwether' trial influencing thousands of pending lawsuits against tech companies over child safety and mental health harms.
- Snap and TikTok settled with the plaintiff before the trial began this year.
- A separate New Mexico jury on June 25, 2024, found Meta liable for $375 million in damages for misleading users about platform safety and enabling child sexual exploitation.
- The Los Angeles trial lasted six weeks, with jurors hearing testimony from executives, whistleblowers, and expert witnesses on addiction and social media.
- Meta and Google have stated they respectfully disagree with the verdicts and plan to appeal both rulings.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Headline emphasizes the verdict could mark a 'turning point' in the global backlash against social media harms to youth.
- Includes a photo caption of Mark Zuckerberg leaving court with Reuters attribution (Mike Blake).
- Highlights Australian government's under-16 social media ban and its alignment with the US verdict.
- Communications Minister Anika Wells' direct quote about 'drum beat against social media harm getting louder'.
- Mentions a second phase of the New Mexico trial in May could impose platform restrictions for local users.
- Details Lisa Given (RMIT professor) calling the lawsuit 'unique' and its influence on pending US lawsuits.
- Jurors assigned Meta 70% responsibility and YouTube 30% of the $3 million compensatory award, explicitly stating $2.1m for Meta and $900,000 for YouTube.
- Jasmine Enberg (Scalable) quoted: '$3 million is a slap on the wrist for companies like Meta and YouTube, which are two of the biggest ad sellers in the world.'
- YouTube spokesperson Luis Li apologized to the plaintiff but emphasized punitive damages must relate to the specific case, not a 'social crusade'.
- Details two further bellwether trials expected in Los Angeles, with outcomes likely determining settlement negotiations.
- Mark Lanier's closing argument analogy: 'How do you make a child never put down the phone? Thatâs called the engineering of addiction.'
- Plaintiff's lawyers compared the case to big tobacco lawsuits of the 1990s, focusing on addictive design features.
- Meta spokesperson's statement: 'Her records show significant emotional and physical abuse, academic struggles and psychiatric conditions, separate from her social media usage.'
- Details the consolidated group of cases in California with over 1,600 plaintiffs, including 350 families and 250 school districts.
- Australian law firms Shine Lawyers and Slater and Gordon explicitly state they are investigating potential Australian cases based on the US ruling.
- Lisa Flynn (Shine Lawyers) calls the $6 million verdict a 'watershed moment' and notes Meta's targeting of generations with addictive features.
- Rebecca Gilsenan (Maurice Blackburn) references the firm's parallel class actions against Apple and Google over app store access.
- Associate Prof Stan Karanasios' quote: 'Features like infinite scroll, autoplay, and constant notifications were not incidental design choices; they were the architecture of addiction.'
- Details the Albanese government's extension of the under-16 social media ban to include platforms with 'addictive systems' like infinite scroll and likes.
- Greens spokesperson Sarah Hanson-Young's call for digital duty of care laws to prevent harm before it occurs.
- Not present in the provided articles (assumed typo; no source named 'theage' in the list).
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- ABC and NEWSCOMAU report the compensatory damages as $3 million (or $4.3 million total including punitive), while GUARDIAN2 states the total awarded was $6 million (including punitive).
- Meta's spokesperson in GUARDIAN1 claims the plaintiff's mental health issues were 'separate from her social media usage,' but the jury and other sources found the companies' negligence was a 'substantial factor' in her harm.
- NEWSCOMAU reports YouTube disputed the plaintiff's usage records, claiming she averaged 'little more than a minute a day,' while other sources do not include this specific rebuttal detail.
- GUARDIAN2 states the verdict could 'reverberate around the globe,' while other sources focus primarily on US legal implications and do not emphasize international legal repercussions as strongly.
- ABC and NEWSCOMAU mention a second phase of the New Mexico trial in May for potential platform restrictions, but GUARDIAN1 does not reference this timeline or detail.
Source Articles
âAccountability has arrivedâ: US jury finds Meta, YouTube guilty in landmark social media addiction trial
Meta and YouTube have just lost a landmark court case about the addictive design of their platforms, a signal that âaccountability has arrivedâ....
Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The verdict could mark a âturning point in the global backlash against their platforms' perceived mental health harms to youth....
Law firms investigate possible Australian cases after US jury finds Meta and YouTube designed addictive products
Courts in Australia may be willing to hold social media companies accountable for real-world harm, lawyers say Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free...
Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds
Six-week trial including whistleblowers and top executives at Meta and YouTube was first of its kind to go to trial Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox Meta a...
Unpacking the social media addiction ruling against Meta and YouTube
A US jury has found Instagram and YouTube were designed to be addictive to young users, in a landmark trial experts say could influence thousands of similar lawsuits....
'Accountability has arrived': Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The case was brought on by a 20-year-old woman who accused the tech companies of causing harm by deliberately designing addictive platforms which worsened her mental health....