← Back to Stories

Usman Khawaja’s 2018 sandpaper scandal allegations reignite with coach denials and player responses

By Updated 12 November 20263 articles from 2 independent sources

Consensus Summary

The resurfacing of Usman Khawaja’s 2018 ball-tampering allegations has reignited a long-simmering controversy in Australian cricket, with former coaches and players publicly clashing over the extent of the team’s involvement. Khawaja, in his memoir *Sabr*, claims the entire Australian squad—including batters, bowlers, and staff—knew about and participated in the use of sandpaper to alter the ball during the 2018 South Africa Test series. The scandal, which initially saw Steve Smith, Cameron Bancroft, and David Warner banned, was captured on live television in Cape Town when Bancroft was seen hiding sandpaper down his trousers. Khawaja’s assertions have sparked strong denials from former batting coach Graeme Hick and head coach Darren Lehmann, both of whom insist they had no prior knowledge of the plot and only learned of it when the incident aired publicly.

The controversy traces back to March 2018, when Australia’s third Test against South Africa in Cape Town became infamous for the sandpaper incident. Smith, Bancroft, and Warner were suspended for their roles, with Smith and Bancroft receiving one-year bans while Warner served a one-year suspension. Khawaja, who was part of the touring party but not directly implicated, has since framed the scandal as a cover-up, arguing that the three players were scapegoated while the broader team remained silent. His memoir, published in 2026, has reignited debates about accountability, with Khawaja accusing a member of the coaching staff of encouraging Bancroft during an interval in the Cape Town Test. The timing of his revelations coincides with renewed scrutiny of Lehmann’s leadership, particularly after former ICC referee Chris Broad accused him of hypocrisy for denying knowledge of the plot while previously criticizing his son’s actions in a 2013 Ashes Test.

Key figures have taken starkly opposing stances. Graeme Hick, who coached Australia from 2016 to 2020, dismissed Khawaja’s claims as ‘absolutely false,’ stating he only learned of the sandpaper plot when it appeared on the big screen in Cape Town. Lehmann echoed this denial, questioning how an entire team could have remained complicit without his awareness. In contrast, David Warner has fully endorsed Khawaja’s version of events, calling his account ‘100 per cent accurate’ and praising him for exposing the truth. Warner also took to social media to criticize Cricket Australia’s handling of the scandal, alleging that Hick was appointed as batting coach only because the organization refused to pay Michael Di Venuto, the previously popular coach, what he deserved. Warner revealed that players had even offered to contribute from their own salaries to retain Di Venuto during the New Zealand tour, underscoring their dissatisfaction with Hick’s appointment.

While the core facts of the 2018 incident—such as the live television exposure in Cape Town and the subsequent bans—are consistent across all sources, differences emerge in framing and emphasis. SMH highlights the expected public statements from Pat Cummins and Mitch Marsh, with Cummins set to address the allegations for the first time on Friday and Marsh facing questions at his pre-game press conference on Thursday. TheWest and 7NEWS, however, focus more on the immediate fallout of Hick’s denial and Warner’s social media response, framing the dispute as a battle between Khawaja’s allies and the former coaching staff. Additionally, SMH includes broader criticism of Lehmann’s leadership, with Broad accusing him of ‘double standards’ for his moral stance in 2013 versus his denial of knowledge in 2018. This contrast has further fueled speculation about Lehmann’s role in the scandal and whether he should have faced consequences beyond leaving his position shortly after the incident.

As the debate intensifies, Cricket Australia remains at the center of scrutiny, with questions lingering over its handling of the 2018 scandal and the subsequent revelations. Khawaja’s refusal to participate in television and radio interviews to promote *Sabr* after facing tough questioning from journalist Sarah Ferguson has only added to the intrigue. With Cummins and Marsh preparing to address the matter publicly, the coming days may bring further clarity—or more controversy—as the cricketing world grapples with whether the full truth about the 2018 sandpaper plot has finally come to light or if this is merely the next chapter in an unresolved saga.

✓ Verified by 2+ sources

Key details reported by multiple sources:

  • Usman Khawaja’s 2018 South African tour ball-tampering allegations involve the use of sandpaper to alter the ball in Cape Town and Port Elizabeth.
  • Graeme Hick, Australia’s former batting coach (2016–2020), denied any knowledge of the sandpaper plot and stated his first awareness was when footage of Cameron Bancroft appeared on the big screen in Cape Town.
  • David Warner, one of three players (alongside Steve Smith and Cameron Bancroft) initially banned for the 2018 sandpaper scandal, publicly backed Khawaja’s claims, calling them ‘100 per cent accurate’ and thanking him for speaking out.
  • Khawaja’s claims that the entire team—batters, bowlers, and staff—were complicit in the sandpaper plot were described by Hick as ‘absolutely false’ and ‘broad’ in nature.
  • Darren Lehmann, former head coach of Australia, also denied knowledge of the sandpaper plot and questioned Khawaja’s assertion that all team members were involved.
  • Khawaja’s revelations appeared in his memoir *Sabr: Finding My Way in Cricket and Life*, published in 2026.
  • The scandal unfolded during the 2018 Australia vs. South Africa Test series, with the incident captured on live television in Cape Town.

Points of Difference

Details reported by only one source:

Sydney Morning Herald
  • Former ICC match referee Chris Broad accused Lehmann of having ‘double standards’ for denying knowledge of the sandpaper plot while previously criticizing his son Stuart Broad’s decision in a 2013 Ashes Test.
  • Victoria captain Peter Handscomb, who was on a walkie-talkie with Lehmann during the Cape Town incident, declined to comment, stating he had ‘had a nice day today’ and preferred to let ‘the powers that be’ handle the matter.
  • Mitch Marsh, Australia’s stand-in ODI captain, is due to address the sandpaper allegations at his pre-game press conference on Thursday ahead of the first game against England, where he is expected to be questioned about his knowledge of the events.
  • Pat Cummins, Australia’s Test captain, is expected to speak publicly for the first time since Khawaja’s claims on Friday, though Cricket Australia has not yet confirmed this.
  • A member of Lehmann’s coaching staff from the 2018 South Africa tour denied any knowledge of the sandpaper plot, calling Khawaja’s claims ‘absolutely false’.

Where the reporting differs

Details that conflict, or appear in only some outlets:

  • TheWest and 7NEWS state that Graeme Hick was appointed as batting coach after Michael Di Venuto resigned, with Warner implying Hick was a second-choice appointment due to Cricket Australia’s reluctance to pay Di Venuto adequately, while SMH does not mention this specific context.
  • SMH reports that Lehmann ‘left his job a few months later’ after the sandpaper scandal, while TheWest and 7NEWS do not specify Lehmann’s departure timeline beyond his denial of knowledge.

Source Articles

THEWEST

Khawaja fall-out deepens amid batting coach denials

The fall-out from Usman Khawaja’s 2018 South African tour ball-tampering allegations shows no sign of abating with David Warner weighing back in.

SMH

‘Absolutely false’: Another former coach denies knowledge of sandpaper plot

Australia’s former batting coach Graeme Hick said he was not aware of the team’s use of sandpaper until footage emerged of Cameron Bancroft on the big screen eight years ago.

More Sport stories

Latest cross-verified stories

Browse all stories from November 2026 in the archive.