Federal government’s national gun buyback scheme faces state opposition after Bondi terror attack
Consensus Summary
The federal government’s push for a national gun buyback scheme, announced after the Bondi terror attack, has stalled as half the states and territories refuse to participate. Key holdouts include South Australia, Queensland, and the Northern Territory, which have either outright rejected the plan or delayed commitment, citing lack of consultation or existing strong laws. Both sources agree on the March 31 deadline passing without full agreement, the 50:50 cost-sharing proposal, and the historical precedent of the 1996 Port Arthur buyback. However, the Guardian highlights opposition from gun lobby groups and political criticism of the scheme as a distraction, while News.com Australia emphasizes public support and state resistance to funding arrangements. Victoria remains undecided pending a police-led review, and Western Australia and Tasmania have moved forward with their own buyback schemes. The federal government insists national consistency is critical for effectiveness, while critics argue the plan lacks detail and consultation, creating uncertainty for lawful gun owners.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- Anthony Albanese set a March 31 deadline for state and territory leaders to agree on a national gun buyback plan, which has now passed without full consensus
- South Australia, Northern Territory, and Queensland have explicitly rejected the federal government’s proposed buyback scheme
- Western Australia completed its own gun buyback in January 2024, while Tasmania is currently running a buyback scheme
- The federal government proposed a 50:50 cost-sharing split for the buyback with states, though no final cost estimate has been released
- The Howard government’s 1996 Port Arthur buyback destroyed over 650,000 firearms at a cost of $371 million (adjusted to ~$770 million today)
- Victoria has delayed committing to the scheme pending a review by former police officer Ken Lay, with the report expected to be released soon
- The buyback was announced in response to the Bondi terror attack and is framed as the largest gun reform since Port Arthur in 1996
- National Cabinet agreed to strengthen gun laws across Australia following the Bondi attack
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Attorney-General Michelle Rowland stated the Albanese government ‘will continue to prosecute our case’ and accused non-participating states of explaining to their constituents why they oppose it
- Queensland and Northern Territory have ‘rejected it outright’ while South Australia has said it would not tighten any laws
- Farmers and recreational shooters argue the buyback lacks detail and punishes lawful gun owners for others’ crimes
- NSW, Western Australia, and Tasmania have legislated stronger gun laws, with Victoria holding a quarter of the country’s firearms but remaining noncommittal
- Federal government spokesperson accused states of ‘standing in the way’ of efforts to remove guns, calling the reforms the largest since Port Arthur
- Shadow Home Affairs Minister Jonno Duniam called the buyback a ‘desperate overreach’ and a distraction from antisemitism/extremism failures
- Shooting Industry Foundation of Australia’s James Walsh stated the buyback has created ‘uncertainty for thousands of law-abiding Australians’ and criticized lack of consultation
- South Australia’s spokesperson claimed the state has ‘some of the strongest firearms laws’ and has not received a formal firearms proposal from the federal government
- The buyback was due to end by January 2028 under federal laws, with AFP expected to lead destruction of surrendered weapons
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- NEWSCOMAU states Victoria holds a quarter of the country’s firearms and has stayed noncommittal, while THEGUARDIAN notes Victoria is awaiting a review report before deciding
- NEWSCOMAU reports South Australia has said it would not tighten any laws, but THEGUARDIAN states South Australia claims it has not received any firearms proposal and is not considering changes
- NEWSCOMAU highlights Queensland and NT have ‘rejected it outright,’ while THEGUARDIAN notes Queensland and NT have ‘ruled out support’ without explicitly stating outright rejection
- THEGUARDIAN claims the buyback is a ‘desperate overreach’ and a distraction from other issues, while NEWSCOMAU frames it as ‘overwhelmingly supported by Australians’ without direct opposition framing
- NEWSCOMAU mentions the federal government’s 50:50 cost split is criticized by NT Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro for demanding full federal funding, but THEGUARDIAN does not explicitly mention this demand
Source Articles
Federal government claims some states standing in the way of ‘getting those guns off our streets’
PM’s deadline to establish the biggest gun buyback in 30 years passes with half of the nation’s governments refusing to join Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast The federal go...
Vow on problematic Bondi promise
The government’s top lawyer is vowing to keep pushing a national gun buyback despite resistance from states and territories....