Federal government’s national gun buyback scheme faces state opposition after Bondi terror attack
Consensus Summary
The federal government’s push for a national gun buyback scheme, proposed after the Bondi terror attack, has stalled due to opposition from half the states and territories. Key states like South Australia, Queensland, and the Northern Territory have rejected the plan, citing existing strong laws or funding disputes, while others like Victoria are delaying decisions pending reviews. The federal government insists on national consistency, arguing the reforms are supported by public opinion and necessary for effectiveness, but critics—including opposition politicians and gun lobby groups—accuse the scheme of overreach and lack of consultation. Western Australia and Tasmania have independently completed or are running their own buybacks, while the federal government’s proposed 50:50 cost-sharing remains contentious. Comparisons to the 1996 Port Arthur buyback highlight the scale of the current effort, though no final cost or timeline has been confirmed. The deadlock underscores divisions between federal and state priorities, with stakeholders on both sides framing the dispute as a matter of public safety versus individual rights.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The federal government proposed a national gun buyback scheme following the Bondi terror attack in March 2024
- Anthony Albanese set a March 31 deadline for state and territory leaders to agree to the buyback plan by July 2024
- South Australia, Queensland, and the Northern Territory have explicitly rejected the federal buyback proposal
- Western Australia completed its own gun buyback in January 2024, while Tasmania is currently running one
- The federal government has proposed a 50:50 cost-sharing split for the buyback with states and territories
- The Howard government’s 1996 Port Arthur buyback destroyed over 650,000 firearms at a cost of $371 million (adjusted to ~$770 million today)
- Victoria has delayed a definitive commitment pending a review by former police officer Ken Lay, with the report received in the past week
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Attorney-General Michelle Rowland stated the buyback was agreed upon by national cabinet after the Bondi attack and accused non-participating states to explain their stance to their constituents
- Farmers and recreational shooters argue the buyback lacks detail and punishes lawful gun owners for others' crimes
- Northern Territory Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro said the Commonwealth should fully fund the buyback
- South Australia stated it would not tighten any gun laws and holds a quarter of the country’s firearms
- NSW, Queensland, and the Northern Territory have legislated stronger gun laws, while WA completed a buyback and Tasmania is underway
- Federal government spokesperson accused states of ‘standing in the way’ of removing guns, emphasizing national consistency is vital for effectiveness
- Shadow Home Affairs Minister Jonno Duniam called the buyback a ‘desperate overreach’ and a distraction from antisemitism/extremism failures
- Shooting Industry Foundation of Australia’s James Walsh said the buyback has caused uncertainty for law-abiding gun owners and businesses
- South Australia’s spokesperson cited rigorous firearm laws (fit-and-proper requirements, time-limited licenses) as reason for non-participation
- The buyback was announced in the weeks after the Bondi terror attack and remains unclear on cost-sharing and timeline
- The federal government described the cost as ‘significant’ but no final figure has been released; destruction of surrendered weapons will be led by AFP
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- NEWSCOMAU says NSW, Queensland, and NT have legislated stronger gun laws, but THEGUARDIAN states Queensland and NT have ruled out support for the federal buyback
- NEWSCOMAU reports Victoria has stayed noncommittal, while THEGUARDIAN states Victoria is awaiting a review report (received in the past week) before committing
- NEWSCOMAU attributes the funding dispute to states wanting the Commonwealth to fully cover costs, but THEGUARDIAN does not specify this exact demand from any state
- THEGUARDIAN claims the buyback was an ‘attempted distraction’ from Albanese’s failures on antisemitism, while NEWSCOMAU focuses on public support and national consistency as key arguments
- NEWSCOMAU states the buyback deadline was March 31 for state agreement to proceed by July, but THEGUARDIAN does not explicitly confirm this timeline
Source Articles
Federal government claims some states standing in the way of ‘getting those guns off our streets’
PM’s deadline to establish the biggest gun buyback in 30 years passes with half of the nation’s governments refusing to join Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast The federal go...
Vow on problematic Bondi promise
The government’s top lawyer is vowing to keep pushing a national gun buyback despite resistance from states and territories....