Federal government’s national gun buyback scheme faces state opposition after Bondi terror attack
Consensus Summary
The federal government’s push for a national gun buyback scheme, announced after the Bondi terror attack, has stalled due to opposition from half the states and territories. Key states like Queensland, Northern Territory, and South Australia have rejected the proposal outright, citing funding disputes and existing strong laws, while Victoria remains undecided pending a review. Both sources agree on the 50:50 cost-sharing model, the March 31 deadline’s failure, and Western Australia’s prior completion of a buyback, but differ on framing—NEWSCOMAU emphasizes federal resolve and public support, while THEGUARDIAN highlights state resistance and industry concerns. The scheme, modeled after the 1996 Port Arthur buyback, faces criticism from gun owners and opposition parties over lack of detail and perceived overreach, with no clear path forward despite the federal government’s insistence on national consistency.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The federal government proposed a national gun buyback scheme following the Bondi terror attack in March 2024, with a March 31 deadline for state/territory agreement
- South Australia, Northern Territory, and Queensland have explicitly rejected the buyback proposal, with Queensland and NT opposing outright
- Western Australia completed its own gun buyback in January 2024, while Tasmania is currently running a buyback scheme
- The federal government’s proposed cost-sharing model for the buyback is a 50:50 split between the Commonwealth and states
- The Howard government’s 1996 Port Arthur buyback destroyed over 650,000 firearms at a cost of $371 million (adjusted to ~$770 million today)
- Victoria has delayed committing to the scheme pending a review by former police officer Ken Lay, with the report received in the past week
- The federal government argues the reforms were agreed upon by National Cabinet after the Bondi attack and are supported by public opinion
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Attorney-General Michelle Rowland stated the buyback was a ‘key policy drafted in the wake of the Bondi terror attack’ and emphasized the ‘national’ context is critical for effectiveness
- Northern Territory Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro criticized the 50:50 funding split, stating the Commonwealth should cover costs entirely
- Farmers and recreational shooters argued the buyback lacks detail and punishes lawful gun owners for crimes of others
- Victoria holds a quarter of the country’s firearms but remains noncommittal, while South Australia said it would not tighten any laws
- Shadow Home Affairs Minister Jonno Duniam accused the buyback of being a ‘desperate overreach’ and a distraction from antisemitism/extremism failures
- The Shooting Industry Foundation of Australia’s CEO, James Walsh, called the buyback ‘botched legislation’ and warned of ‘uncertainty for thousands of law-abiding Australians’
- South Australia’s spokesperson claimed the state has ‘some of the strongest firearms laws in the country’ and has not received any formal proposal from the federal government
- The federal government’s spokesperson framed states as ‘standing in the way’ of removing guns from streets, citing National Cabinet agreement
- The Coalition opposed the scheme from the outset, arguing it did not address ‘real issues’ post-Bondi attack
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- NEWSCOMAU reports Victoria holds a quarter of the country’s firearms and is noncommittal, while THEGUARDIAN states Victoria is awaiting a review report and plans to release a response soon
- NEWSCOMAU states South Australia has said it would not tighten any laws, but THEGUARDIAN claims South Australia has ‘not received any firearms proposal’ and has ‘strongest laws’
- NEWSCOMAU attributes the 50:50 funding split to the federal government’s proposal, while THEGUARDIAN implies states are resisting the split without specifying their counterproposal
- THEGUARDIAN claims the buyback was announced in the ‘weeks after the Bondi terror attack,’ but NEWSCOMAU specifies it was drafted as a ‘key policy’ post-attack with a March 31 deadline
- NEWSCOMAU quotes Rowland saying the buyback is ‘overwhelmingly supported by the Australian people,’ but THEGUARDIAN does not reference public opinion and focuses on opposition from states and lobby groups
Source Articles
Vow on problematic Bondi promise
The government’s top lawyer is vowing to keep pushing a national gun buyback despite resistance from states and territories....
Federal government claims some states standing in the way of ‘getting those guns off our streets’
PM’s deadline to establish the biggest gun buyback in 30 years passes with half of the nation’s governments refusing to join Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast The federal go...