Federal government’s national gun buyback scheme faces state opposition after Bondi terror attack
Consensus Summary
The federal government’s push for a national gun buyback scheme, proposed after the Bondi terror attack, has stalled due to opposition from half of Australia’s states and territories. The scheme, intended to remove firearms from circulation, was set to begin by July 2024 after a March 31 deadline passed without full agreement. Key holdouts include South Australia, Queensland, and the Northern Territory, which have rejected the plan outright, citing concerns over funding (a proposed 50:50 split) and existing gun laws. Western Australia and Tasmania have independently implemented buyback schemes, while Victoria remains undecided pending a state-led review. Both sources agree on the scheme’s origins in the Bondi attack and the financial stakes, but diverge on framing: the federal government emphasizes national consistency and public safety, while critics argue it lacks detail, punishes lawful owners, and distracts from broader security issues. The buyback’s future hinges on resolving funding disputes and securing state buy-in, with comparisons drawn to the 1996 Port Arthur reforms as a precedent for scale and cost.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The federal government proposed a national gun buyback scheme following the Bondi terror attack in March 2024
- Anthony Albanese set a March 31 deadline for state and territory leaders to agree to the buyback plan by July 2024
- South Australia, Queensland, and the Northern Territory have explicitly rejected the federal buyback proposal
- Western Australia completed its own gun buyback in January 2024, while Tasmania is currently running a buyback scheme
- The federal government has proposed a 50:50 cost-sharing split for the buyback with states and territories
- The Howard government’s 1996 Port Arthur buyback destroyed over 650,000 firearms at a cost of $371 million (adjusted to ~$770 million today)
- Victoria has delayed committing to the buyback pending a review by former police officer Ken Lay, with the report expected soon
- The buyback was agreed upon by the National Cabinet following the Bondi attack, according to both sources
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Attorney-General Michelle Rowland stated the buyback was ‘agreed to by national cabinet following the Bondi attack’ and criticized non-participating states to ‘explain to their constituencies why that’s the case’
- Farmers and recreational shooters argue the buyback lacks detail and punishes lawful gun owners for crimes of others
- NSW, Western Australia, and Tasmania have legislated stronger gun laws, while Victoria holds a quarter of the country’s firearms but remains noncommittal
- South Australia stated it would not tighten any laws and has some of the strongest existing firearms laws in the country
- Federal government spokesperson accused states of ‘standing in the way’ of efforts to remove dangerous weapons
- Shadow Home Affairs Minister Jonno Duniam called the buyback a ‘desperate overreach’ and a distraction from antisemitism/extremism failures
- Shooting Industry Foundation of Australia’s James Walsh said the buyback has created ‘uncertainty for thousands of law-abiding Australians’ and ‘dismantled livelihoods’
- South Australia’s spokesperson emphasized the state has ‘rigorous fit-and-proper requirements, time-limited licences, and restrictions on ownership to only citizens and permanent residents’
- The Coalition opposed the buyback from the outset, claiming it did not address ‘real issues’ post-Bondi attack
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- NEWSCOMAU reports South Australia has ‘not tightened any laws,’ while THEGUARDIAN states South Australia already has ‘some of the strongest firearms laws in the country’
- NEWSCOMAU says Victoria is ‘noncommittal,’ but THEGUARDIAN notes Victoria has ‘postponed a definitive commitment’ after receiving a review report
- NEWSCOMAU attributes the buyback’s origin to ‘Labor’s key policy drafted in the wake of the Bondi terror attack,’ while THEGUARDIAN frames it as a ‘desperate overreach’ by the Albanese government
- THEGUARDIAN claims the buyback was ‘announced in the weeks after the Bondi terror attack,’ but NEWSCOMAU specifies it was drafted as a ‘key policy’ post-attack with a March 31 deadline
- NEWSCOMAU cites Northern Territory Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro as saying the commonwealth should ‘foot the bill entirely,’ but THEGUARDIAN does not mention this specific demand
Source Articles
Federal government claims some states standing in the way of ‘getting those guns off our streets’
PM’s deadline to establish the biggest gun buyback in 30 years passes with half of the nation’s governments refusing to join Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast The federal go...
Vow on problematic Bondi promise
The government’s top lawyer is vowing to keep pushing a national gun buyback despite resistance from states and territories....