US court rulings hold Meta and Google liable for social media addiction and harm to minors
Consensus Summary
Two US juries in March 2025 delivered landmark rulings against Meta and Google, finding both companies liable for designing addictive social media platforms that harmed young users. In California, a jury awarded $3m in damages to a 20-year-old plaintiff (KGM) who testified her use of YouTube and Instagram, starting at ages six and nine respectively, led to severe mental health issues including depression, self-harm, and body dysmorphia. The jury determined Meta and Google knew or should have known their platforms posed dangers to minors and failed to warn users adequately. The California case also found both companies acted with malice, setting the stage for additional punitive damages. Separately, a New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375m for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading users about platform safety. Both rulings relied heavily on internal company documents revealing executives' knowledge of harms and deliberate design choices to maximize engagement. Meta and Google have announced plans to appeal, but the verdicts mark a significant shift in public and legal accountability for tech giants. The cases are part of over 20 'bellwether' trials pending in the US, with similar lawsuits emerging globally as governments and advocacy groups push for stricter regulations on social media design and child safety. The rulings have been compared to the tobacco industry's legal reckoning, with critics arguing they could force platforms to redesign addictive features or face billions in liabilities.
â Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- A California jury found Meta and Google liable for negligence in designing addictive social media platforms, awarding $3m ($4.3m total) in damages to a 20-year-old plaintiff (KGM) in March 2025.
- Meta was ordered to pay $375m in civil penalties in a New Mexico case for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading users about platform safety, with the ruling issued on March 2025.
- The California case awarded $3m in compensatory damages ($2.1m to Meta, $900k to Google) and recommended an additional $3m in punitive damages for malice, fraud, or oppression.
- The plaintiff (KGM) testified she began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at age nine, with her social media use peaking at 16 hours daily and leading to depression, self-harm, and body dysmorphia by age 13.
- Jurors in the California case found Meta and Google acted with malice, oppression, or fraud, a finding that supports punitive damages claims.
- Snapchat and TikTok settled the KGM lawsuit before trial, with terms kept confidential.
- The California trial was the first of over 20 'bellwether' cases scheduled in the US, with additional trials planned in June and July 2025.
- Meta and Google both announced plans to appeal the rulings, with Meta stating it 'respectfully disagrees' and Google calling the allegations 'simply not true'.
- Internal Meta documents cited in the New Mexico case included an email stating 'targeting 11-year-olds feels like tobacco companies a couple decades ago' and another noting Instagram as a 'two-sided marketplace for human trafficking'.
- The New Mexico case involved undercover sting operations by the state attorney general's office to demonstrate Meta's failure to stop child sexual exploitation on its platforms.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Van Badham compared the social media cases to 'Big Tobacco' and suggested the rulings could lead to global class actions and regulatory changes, including Australia's under-16 social media ban.
- The article highlighted internal Meta documents acknowledging risks of exploitation and harm, including an email stating 'the young ones are the best ones' for long-term retention.
- Van Badham criticized Meta's defense for arguing the plaintiff's home life justified her social media use, comparing it to tobacco companies claiming smoking prevents workplace violence.
- Freedland quoted Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen, who suggested Meta could face a trillion-dollar liability if similar cases succeed, potentially leading to bankruptcy.
- The article referenced Sarah Wynn-Williams' memoir *Careless People*, detailing how Meta tracked teenage girls' emotional states to sell targeted ads for cosmetics.
- Freedland noted that Meta's CEO Mark Zuckerberg dismissed concerns about body image filters on Instagram, calling it 'paternalistic' to limit user choices.
- The editorial compared the rulings to the tobacco industry's reckoning in the 1990s, emphasizing the need for precautionary regulation of tech companies' impact on children.
- It highlighted that internal Meta documents exposed executives' cavalier approach to child safety, including an email equating targeting 11-year-olds to tobacco tactics.
- ABC reported that YouTube disputed the plaintiff's usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day on the platform, contradicting her testimony of 16-hour daily use.
- The article included a quote from Laura Marquez-Garrett, a lawyer with the Social Media Victims Law Center, stating the case was 'a vehicle, not an outcome' and historic regardless of future appeals.
- The Tech Oversight Project was quoted as saying, 'The era of big tech invincibility is over,' and Prince Harry was mentioned as weighing in on the verdicts.
- The article detailed Meta's aggressive defense strategy, including quoting excerpts from the plaintiff's texts and therapy notes to blame her mother for her mental health issues.
- Meta's public relations team emphasized the plaintiff's 'toxic home' and lack of social media addiction as a recognized mental health condition in the DSM-5.
- Julianna Arnold, a parent advocate, criticized Meta's defense, stating, 'This was a conscious decision that they made. It was not an accident, and parents are not to blame.'
- The article included a quote from Meta whistleblower Arturo BĂ©jar, who said the trials exposed internal documentation about Meta's knowledge of harms and misled regulators.
- It mentioned that the UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, cited the LA verdict in support of potential UK social media bans for under-16s and curbs on addictive features.
- The article noted that the $3m award was a 'slap on the wrist' for Meta and YouTube, but if companies are forced to redesign products, it could threaten their business models.
- Jasmine Enberg of Scalable was quoted as saying the verdicts could lead to existential threats to Meta and YouTube's ad-driven revenue models.
- SBS summarized the verdict as a 'turning point in the global backlash against social media's perceived mental health harms to youth.'
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The Guardian (Van Badham) states Meta was found liable for 70% of harms in the California case, but ABC reports the jury assigned 70% liability to Meta without specifying the exact percentage of harm attribution.
- Meta's spokesperson claims KGM's mental health issues were 'profoundly complex and cannot be linked to a single app,' while the Guardian (Article 10) highlights KGM's testimony that her mother was 'trying her best' and not abusive, contradicting Meta's portrayal of her home life.
- YouTube disputed the plaintiff's usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day (ABC), while the plaintiff testified she used the platform for up to 16 hours daily (multiple sources).
- The Guardian (Article 10) reports Meta's defense focused on the plaintiff's 'toxic home' and bullying at school, but the Guardian (Article 9) states jurors found Meta's design choices unacceptable and that the company knew the harms but ignored them.
- Google's spokesperson called YouTube a 'responsibly built streaming platform, not a social media site' (Guardian, Article 9), while the California jury found YouTube liable for negligence in its design and operation as a social media platform.
Source Articles
Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds
Six-week trial including whistleblowers and top executives at Meta and YouTube was first of its kind to go to trial Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox Meta a...
At last, David has landed a double punch on the tech Goliaths. Now to hit them even harder | Jonathan Freedland
The US court verdicts declaring Meta liable for getting people addicted and ruining lives must be just the start of a global fightback Good news is so rare these days, you donât quite know how to take...
Human rights groups cheer âwatershedâ verdict in social media addiction trial
As many organizations celebrate outcome, some are skeptical as to what it means for privacy protections The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addicti...
The Guardian view on social media in the dock: tech bros move fast â society is trying to catch up | Editorial
Two court cases have shown how companies can be forced to take responsibility for their impact on public health Debate about online harms has tended to focus on abusive and hateful content. But the fo...
âThe era of invincibility is overâ: the week that brought big tech to heel
Ruling that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addictive products marks possible watershed moment for social media The young woman at the heart of what has been called the tech industryâs âbig tob...
It is no fluke that social media platforms are addictive and causing harm. They were designed that way | Van Badham
The findings in two US court cases should embarrass anyone who claimed Australiaâs social media ban was âboomerâ moralising A disdain towards the notion of âconsequenceâ somewhat defines the contempor...
âAccountability has arrivedâ: US jury finds Meta, YouTube guilty in landmark social media addiction trial
Meta and YouTube have just lost a landmark court case about the addictive design of their platforms, a signal that âaccountability has arrivedâ....
Law firms investigate possible Australian cases after US jury finds Meta and YouTube designed addictive products
Courts in Australia may be willing to hold social media companies accountable for real-world harm, lawyers say Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free...
'Accountability has arrived': Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The case was brought on by a 20-year-old woman who accused the tech companies of causing harm by deliberately designing addictive platforms which worsened her mental health....
How Metaâs victim-blaming failed to sway jurors in landmark social media addiction trial
Aggressive strategy and loss in the trial highlight a problem for tech firms: a widespread distrust of social media companies When Meta , the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, sought to defend...
Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The verdict could mark a âturning point in the global backlash against their platforms' perceived mental health harms to youth....
âAccountability has arrivedâ: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co
With two unprecedented trial defeats, big tech firms face crisis akin to that faced by cigarette makers in the 1990s In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world f...
Unpacking the social media addiction ruling against Meta and YouTube
A US jury has found Instagram and YouTube were designed to be addictive to young users, in a landmark trial experts say could influence thousands of similar lawsuits....