Federal government’s national gun buyback scheme faces state opposition after Bondi terror attack
Consensus Summary
The federal government’s proposed national gun buyback scheme, announced after the Bondi terror attack in March 2024, has stalled due to opposition from half the states and territories, including South Australia, Queensland, and the Northern Territory. Both sources confirm the March 31 deadline passed without agreement, leaving the scheme’s future uncertain despite the federal government’s insistence it was nationally agreed upon by National Cabinet. Key sticking points include funding arrangements—with states demanding full Commonwealth coverage—and concerns over consultation processes, particularly from South Australia and Victoria, which is awaiting a police-led review. While Western Australia and Tasmania have independently implemented buyback schemes, the federal government argues the reforms are vital for national consistency, citing the 1996 Port Arthur buyback as a precedent. Opposition groups and some states frame the proposal as an overreach, highlighting uncertainty for lawful gun owners and criticism of rushed legislation, though the federal government maintains public support and the necessity of a unified approach.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The federal government proposed a national gun buyback scheme following the Bondi terror attack in March 2024, with a March 31 deadline for state/territory agreement
- South Australia, Northern Territory, and Queensland have explicitly rejected the buyback proposal, with Queensland and NT opposing outright
- Western Australia completed its own gun buyback in January 2024, and Tasmania is currently running a buyback scheme
- The federal government’s proposed cost-sharing model for the buyback is a 50:50 split between the Commonwealth and states
- The Howard government’s 1996 Port Arthur buyback destroyed over 650,000 firearms at a cost of $371 million (adjusted to ~$770 million today)
- Victoria has delayed committing to the scheme pending a review by former top police officer Ken Lay, with the report received in the past week
- The federal government argues the reforms were agreed upon by National Cabinet after the Bondi attack and are supported by public opinion
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Attorney-General Michelle Rowland stated the buyback was a ‘key policy drafted in the wake of the Bondi terror attack’ and emphasized the ‘national’ context is critical for effectiveness
- Northern Territory Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro criticized the 50:50 funding split, stating the Commonwealth should cover costs entirely
- Farmers and recreational shooters argued the buyback lacks detail and punishes lawful gun owners for others’ crimes
- Victoria holds a quarter of the country’s firearms but remains noncommittal, while South Australia said it would not tighten any laws
- The buyback was set to kick in by July 2024 if states agreed by the March 31 deadline
- Federal government spokesperson accused states of ‘standing in the way’ of removing guns from streets, framing the delay as a failure to prioritize public safety
- Shadow Home Affairs Minister Jonno Duniam called the buyback a ‘desperate overreach’ and a distraction from the Albanese government’s handling of antisemitism and extremism
- South Australia’s spokesperson cited ‘rigorous fit-and-proper requirements’ and ‘time-limited licences’ as reasons for rejecting the buyback, emphasizing no consultation had occurred
- The Shooting Industry Foundation of Australia’s CEO, James Walsh, stated the buyback has created ‘uncertainty for thousands of law-abiding Australians’ and criticized ‘botched legislation’
- The buyback’s end date was originally set for January 2028, with states responsible for collection and AFP leading destruction of surrendered weapons
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- NEWSCOMAU reports the buyback was set to begin by July 2024 if states agreed by March 31, but THEGUARDIAN states there is no timeline for the buyback and it remains unclear when it may proceed
- NEWSCOMAU states Victoria holds a quarter of the country’s firearms and has stayed noncommittal, while THEGUARDIAN notes Victoria has postponed commitment until after a review by Ken Lay, with the report received in the past week (no contradiction in facts, but THEGUARDIAN adds timing detail)
- NEWSCOMAU attributes the funding dispute to states wanting the Commonwealth to cover costs entirely, but THEGUARDIAN does not specify this demand—only that states have walked away from the scheme
- THEGUARDIAN quotes Duniam calling the buyback a ‘desperate overreach’ and a distraction, while NEWSCOMAU does not include this opposition framing from the Coalition
- NEWSCOMAU mentions the buyback was drafted as a key policy post-Bondi attack, but THEGUARDIAN does not reference this drafting process—only the National Cabinet agreement
Source Articles
Federal government claims some states standing in the way of ‘getting those guns off our streets’
PM’s deadline to establish the biggest gun buyback in 30 years passes with half of the nation’s governments refusing to join Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast The federal go...
Vow on problematic Bondi promise
The government’s top lawyer is vowing to keep pushing a national gun buyback despite resistance from states and territories....