Federal government’s national gun buyback scheme faces state opposition after Bondi terror attack
Consensus Summary
The federal government’s push for a national gun buyback scheme, launched after the Bondi terror attack, has stalled as half the states and territories—including South Australia, Queensland, and the Northern Territory—refuse to participate. The scheme, framed as the largest since Port Arthur in 1996, requires unanimous national agreement to proceed, with a March 31 deadline for states to sign on. While NSW supports the plan and Western Australia/Tasmania have implemented their own buybacks, critics argue the federal government’s 50:50 cost-sharing model is insufficient, with some states demanding full funding. Opposition parties and gun lobby groups accuse the buyback of being poorly consulted and a political distraction, highlighting uncertainty for lawful gun owners. Both sources agree on the core deadlock but differ on framing: the federal government emphasizes moral failure to act, while states cite legal, financial, and procedural concerns. The lack of consensus leaves the buyback’s future uncertain, with no clear path forward despite the government’s insistence on national consistency for effectiveness.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The federal government proposed a national gun buyback scheme following the Bondi terror attack in March 2024, with a March 31 deadline for state/territory agreement
- South Australia, Northern Territory, and Queensland have explicitly rejected the buyback proposal, with Queensland and NT opposing outright
- NSW, Western Australia, and Tasmania have either supported or implemented their own gun buyback schemes (WA completed in January, Tas underway)
- The federal government’s proposed cost-sharing model is a 50:50 split between the Commonwealth and states, though critics like NT Chief Minister Lia Finocchiaro demand full federal funding
- The Howard government’s 1996 Port Arthur buyback destroyed over 650,000 firearms at a cost of $371 million (adjusted to ~$770 million today)
- Victoria has delayed commitment pending a review by former police officer Ken Lay, with the report received in the past week
- The federal government claims national consistency is critical for gun law effectiveness, citing ‘weakest state’ as a risk
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Attorney-General Michelle Rowland stated ‘Labor will continue to prosecute our case’ and accused non-participating states of explaining to their constituencies why they oppose it
- Farmers and recreational shooters argue the buyback lacks detail and punishes lawful gun owners for crimes of others
- South Australia stated it would not tighten any gun laws and holds a quarter of the country’s firearms
- The federal government’s deadline for the buyback to kick in was July 2024, though no timeline remains after the March 31 agreement deadline passed
- Shadow Home Affairs Minister Jonno Duniam called the buyback a ‘desperate overreach’ and accused the government of using it to distract from failures on antisemitism and extremism
- South Australia’s spokesperson claimed the state had ‘not received any firearms proposal’ from federal counterparts and emphasized existing ‘strongest firearms laws’
- The Shooting Industry Foundation of Australia’s CEO, James Walsh, stated ‘no winners’—no public safety victory or certainty for law-abiding gun owners
- The federal government’s spokesperson accused states of ‘standing in the way’ of getting guns off streets, framing it as a moral failure to prioritize public safety
- The buyback was announced in the weeks after the Bondi terror attack, described as the ‘biggest gun buyback in 30 years’
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- NEWSCOMAU states South Australia ‘would not tighten any laws,’ while THEGUARDIAN reports South Australia claims it has ‘not received any firearms proposal’ from the federal government
- NEWSCOMAU mentions Victoria as ‘noncommittal,’ but THEGUARDIAN clarifies Victoria is awaiting a definitive response after receiving Lay’s review report in the past week
- NEWSCOMAU attributes the federal government’s 50:50 funding proposal to ‘lack of detail’ criticism, while THEGUARDIAN highlights NT’s demand for *full* federal funding as the primary funding objection
- THEGUARDIAN frames the buyback as a ‘distraction’ from extremism failures (opinion), but NEWSCOMAU focuses on funding and detail as the core objections from states
- NEWSCOMAU states the buyback was drafted as a key policy *in the wake of* the Bondi attack, while THEGUARDIAN specifies it was announced *in the weeks after* the attack
Source Articles
Federal government claims some states standing in the way of ‘getting those guns off our streets’
PM’s deadline to establish the biggest gun buyback in 30 years passes with half of the nation’s governments refusing to join Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast The federal go...
Vow on problematic Bondi promise
The government’s top lawyer is vowing to keep pushing a national gun buyback despite resistance from states and territories....