← Back to Stories

Childcare worker convicted of indecent treatment of child, acquitted of rape charges in Queensland

3 hours ago3 articles from 2 sources

Consensus Summary

A former childcare worker named Arvind Ajay Sing, 43, was convicted of indecent treatment of a child but acquitted of digitally raping a young girl at a Queensland daycare centre in 2022. The trial, held in Maroochydore District Court, lasted three days with testimony from ten witnesses, including the victim. Sing was sentenced to 20 months in jail, with half suspended, before deportation to Fiji. His visa was cancelled after charges in 2022, but he remained in Australia until deported in July 2025 before voluntarily returning for trial in February 2026. The victim’s parents described the offense as a betrayal of trust, with one parent tearfully testifying in court. While the family expressed devastation over the lighter sentence, the judge called the crime a serious betrayal of trust. DNA evidence was neutral, and the defence argued the child’s testimony was weak, contrasting with the prosecution’s portrayal of the victim’s innocence. The case highlights systemic failures in child protection and immigration enforcement, as Sing was allowed to work with children despite charges.

✓ Verified by 2+ sources

Key details reported by multiple sources:

  • Arvind Ajay Sing, 43, a Fiji citizen, was charged with digitally raping a child at a Queensland childcare centre in 2022
  • Sing pleaded not guilty to the rape charge but was found guilty of one count of indecent treatment of a child under his care
  • The trial took place at Maroochydore District Court on the Sunshine Coast, Queensland, in February 2026
  • Sing was sentenced to 20 months in jail, with half (10 months) suspended before deportation to Fiji
  • Sing voluntarily returned to Queensland in February 2026 to face trial after being deported in July 2025
  • The victim was a young girl, and the abuse occurred at a daycare centre where children were meant to be safe
  • Sing’s visa was cancelled after the 2022 charges, but he remained in Australia until May 2025, when he was detained in immigration detention
  • The trial lasted three days, with 10 witnesses, including the victim, testifying
  • Judge Glen Cash described the offense as a 'betrayal of trust' and 'brazen' offending

Points of Difference

Details reported by only one source:

NEWSCOMAAU
  • The victim’s father stated on A Current Affair that the family had been in 'limbo land' for four years, describing the process as 'prolonged and painful'
  • The father said, 'What they put our daughter through was absolutely disgusting' and 'It’s not like he snuck out the backdoor or got on a boat and left the country, someone stamped his paperwork and let an accused rapist go out the front door'
  • The child’s mother praised the victim as 'incredible' and 'the bravest little girl,' saying the family had to 'fight to get him off the streets'
  • The father used the phrase 'I’d get lower if I didn’t pay my taxes' to express devastation over the outcome
ABC News
  • The victim’s parent described the offense as a 'deliberate exploitation of a position of trust over a vulnerable child' during court proceedings
  • The court heard Singh incurred a debt for deportation costs and that it was not determined how his deportation would be funded
  • Crown prosecutor Alex Stark described the victim’s world as 'unicorns and teddies,' emphasizing their lack of awareness of the offense's nature
  • Defence barrister Lachlan Ygoa-McKeown called the child’s evidence 'vague and weak' and claimed Singh never touched the child’s underwear or genitals
  • DNA testing results were reported as 'neutral' and did not support either case
  • The victim’s parents’ joint impact statement read, 'Trust was broken' and 'What should have been a safe and nurturing place became the setting of a profound betrayal'

Contradictions

Conflicting information between sources:

  • NEWSCOMAU states the victim’s father said the family had been in limbo for four years, while ABC does not specify the duration of limbo but focuses on the emotional impact during court
  • NEWSCOMAU reports the father’s exact phrase 'I’d get lower if I didn’t pay my taxes,' which is not mentioned in ABC’s coverage
  • ABC describes the victim’s evidence as 'vague and weak' per the defence, but NEWSCOMAU does not include this specific critique
  • NEWSCOMAU highlights the family’s fight to prevent Singh from working with children again, while ABC does not mention this aspect of the aftermath
  • NEWSCOMAU’s headline and quotes emphasize the family’s devastation over the light sentence, whereas ABC’s headline focuses solely on the legal outcome without additional emotional context

Source Articles

ABC

Former childcare worker jailed for indecent treatment of child

A former childcare worker from Fiji is sentenced to jail for the indecent treatment of a child at a daycare centre in Queensland, and will be deported afterwards....

20 March 2026
ABC

Childcare worker guilty of indecent treatment of child, not guilty of rape

A former childcare worker has been found not guilty of raping a child in his care after a three-day trial on the Sunshine Coast....

19 March 2026
NEWSCOMAU

Inside fight for child abuser to face justice

The family of a young girl abused by a childcare worker said they are “devastated” to learn of his 10-month jail sentence after he was found guilty....

Yesterday