Two men acquitted of raping intoxicated woman picked up from Darwin nightclub
Consensus Summary
Two men, Panormitis Charalampis and Michael Vrouvis, were acquitted of multiple counts of sexual intercourse without consent after a two-week trial in Darwin’s Northern Territory Supreme Court. The case centered on whether a young woman, picked up from outside Mayberry nightclub at 3:30am on January 14 2024, was too intoxicated to consent to sexual activity over eight hours in her apartment. Prosecutors argued the woman’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC) of 0.1 to 0.15 rendered her incapable of consent, supported by CCTV footage showing her struggling to walk and her fragmented testimony of being ‘in and out of consciousness.’ The defence countered that the woman initiated sexual contact and may have regretted the night, emphasizing her inconsistent memory gaps and behaviour like walking naked on a balcony. The jury ultimately found no reasonable doubt, acquitting both men unanimously after deliberations. The trial highlighted conflicting interpretations of consent, intoxication, and the reliability of the woman’s testimony, with defence lawyers arguing the men acted out of perceived kindness rather than predatory intent.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- Panormitis Charalampis and Michael Vrouvis were charged with four counts each of sexual intercourse without consent in the Northern Territory Supreme Court
- The incident occurred on January 14, 2024, after the woman left Mayberry nightclub in Darwin’s CBD around 3:30am
- The woman ordered an Uber but was picked up by Charalampis and Vrouvis outside the nightclub, believing them to be her Uber drivers
- The men were acquitted unanimously after nearly seven hours of jury deliberation
- The woman’s blood alcohol concentration was estimated between 0.1 and 0.15 (or 0.2 and 0.1, per expert testimony) when she reached her apartment
- CCTV footage showed the woman struggling to walk and being assisted by the men after being picked up
- The trial lasted approximately two weeks, with closing arguments delivered by Crown Prosecutor Rebecca Everitt and defence lawyers James Stuchbery, Beth Wild, and Stephen Robson SC
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Panormitis Charalampis testified he felt a 'duty' to ensure the woman got home safely and claimed she initiated sexual activity by grabbing his arm
- Charalampis testified he could 'understand English more than I can speak it' and gave evidence through a translator
- Crown Prosecutor Rebecca Everitt questioned Charalampis on whether he knew the woman was 'very drunk' and repeatedly pressed him on the issue of consent
- The woman’s memory was described as 'fragmented and punctuated by black spots' with a BAC of 0.1 to 0.15
- Michael Vrouvis declined to testify, with his friend Jimmy Parimeros stating Vrouvis initially refused sex due to her intoxication but later agreed
- The woman’s mother and housemate testified during the trial
- CCTV footage showed Charalampis getting into the back seat of the car after the woman fell silent and 'came to' after he pushed her
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- Article 1 states the woman’s BAC was between 0.1 and 0.15, while Article 2 cites expert testimony placing it between 0.2 and 0.1 (likely a typo in Article 2, but inconsistent phrasing)
- Article 1 reports the woman’s BAC was 'in the high to severe range' (0.1-0.15), but Article 2 describes her as 'very drunk' with no explicit BAC range in that article
- Article 1 claims the woman ‘passed out in the car and required assistance walking,’ while Article 2 describes her as ‘crawling and falling out of a car, laying on the ground, unable to walk without being carried’ (more graphic)
- Article 1 notes the woman ‘believed the men were her Uber driver and his friend,’ while Article 2 does not mention this specific belief
- Article 1 states the woman ‘ordered an Uber to take her home’ after realising she was ‘too drunk,’ but Article 2 does not explicitly mention her realising she was too drunk
Source Articles
Jury clears men accused of raping intoxicated woman waiting for an Uber
Two men accused of raping a young woman they picked up while she waited for an Uber have been acquitted on all charges by a Northern Territory jury....
Trial of two men accused of rape in Darwin hears closing arguments
The jury in the trial of two men accused of picking up a young woman waiting for an Uber after a night out and raping her in her home has heard closing submissions....
Man accused of raping woman in her apartment testifies 'she wasn't that drunk'
Panormitis Charalampis, co-accused of picking up an intoxicated young woman from outside a nightclub while she was waiting for an uber and sexually assaulting her at her apartment, took the stand, und...