US court rulings hold Meta and Google liable for social media addiction harming young users
Consensus Summary
Two US court rulings in March 2024 marked a turning point in holding social media giants accountable for harming young users. A Los Angeles jury found Meta (Instagram) and Google (YouTube) liable for negligence in a landmark case, awarding $3 million in compensatory damages to a 20-year-old plaintiff who testified her addiction to the platforms starting at age six led to severe mental health issues. The jury determined both companies knew their platforms posed dangers to minors but failed to warn users adequately, assigning 70% liability to Meta. Just one day earlier, a New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for enabling child sexual exploitation on its platforms, citing failures in safety measures and age verification. Both cases relied heavily on internal company documents revealing awareness of risks and deliberate design choices to maximize engagement among young users. The rulings follow thousands of pending lawsuits and have prompted Meta and YouTube to announce appeals. While the verdicts do not mandate platform redesigns, they signal a shift in public perception and legal accountability, with advocates comparing the cases to the tobacco industry's legal battles. The outcomes are expected to influence future trials and global regulatory efforts, including Australia's proposed digital duty of care laws.
â Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- A Los Angeles jury found Meta (Instagram) and Google (YouTube) liable for negligence in a social media addiction case on March 21, 2024, awarding $3 million in compensatory damages ($4.3 million total including punitive damages pending).
- The plaintiff, identified as KGM, testified she began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at age nine, spending up to 16 hours daily and developing depression, self-harm, body dysmorphia, and social phobia by age 13.
- Jurors found both companies knew or should have known their platforms posed dangers to minors and failed to warn users adequately, with Meta assigned 70% liability and Google 30%.
- The verdict came one day after a New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for enabling child sexual exploitation on its platforms, citing failures in age verification and safety measures.
- Meta and YouTube have both announced plans to appeal the rulings, with Meta stating it 'respectfully disagrees' with the verdicts.
- Snapchat and TikTok settled with the plaintiff before the Los Angeles trial began, avoiding trial exposure.
- The Los Angeles case was the first of over 20 'bellwether' trials scheduled in California, with additional lawsuits involving 2,000+ plaintiffs pending across the US.
- Internal Meta documents cited in court acknowledged risks of exploitation and harm, including an email stating 'targeting 11-year-olds feels like tobacco companies a couple decades ago'.
- The jury deliberated for nine days in the Los Angeles case and 44 hours in the New Mexico case before reaching verdicts.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Van Badham compared the social media cases to 'Big Tobacco' and suggested the rulings could lead to global class actions and regulatory changes, including Australia's digital duty of care proposals.
- The Guardian highlighted internal Meta documents stating 'Instagram had become the leading two-sided marketplace for human trafficking' and 'the young ones are the best ones' for long-term retention.
- The Guardian reported that the New Mexico case sought court-mandated changes to Meta's platforms, including stronger age verification and protections for minors in encrypted communications.
- The Guardian quoted tech scholar Rob Nicholls describing how platforms borrowed from 'behavioural and neurobiological techniques used by poker machines and exploited by the cigarette industry'.
- The Guardian mentioned that the Los Angeles jury found Meta and Google acted with 'malice, oppression, and fraud', setting the stage for punitive damages.
- ABC reported that YouTube disputed the plaintiff's usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day on the platform, contradicting her testimony of 'all day long' use.
- ABC noted that Meta's defense emphasized the plaintiff's 'turbulent home life' and played recordings of her mother yelling at her during closing arguments.
- ABC included a quote from Laura Marquez-Garrett of the Social Media Victims Law Center stating the case was 'a vehicle, not an outcome' and historic regardless of appeal outcomes.
- ABC highlighted that the verdict validates Australia's stance on social media harm, with Communications Minister Anika Wells tweeting about the 'drum beat against social media harm' getting louder.
- SBS provided a concise summary emphasizing the verdict as a 'turning point in the global backlash against perceived mental health harms to youth'.
- NewscomAustralia included a quote from Jasmine Enberg of Scalable stating '$3 million is a slap on the wrist' for Meta and YouTube, but redesigning products could threaten their business models.
- NewscomAustralia reported that YouTube lawyer Luis Li apologized to the plaintiff but argued punitive damages should not be part of a 'social crusade'.
- Article 1 (Guardian) explicitly stated the New Mexico jury found Meta's actions 'unconscionable' and cited internal Meta documents acknowledging risks of exploitation and harm.
- Article 1 compared the social media cases to Australia's 'landmark social media ban for teenagers' and suggested the rulings could force global accountability.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The Guardian (Article 1) states the plaintiff used Instagram up to 16 hours daily, while ABC reports YouTube disputed her usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day on YouTube.
- The Guardian (Article 2) reports the California jury voted 10-2 in favor of the plaintiff, but ABC does not mention the jury split and focuses on the unanimous verdict on all seven questions.
- NewscomAustralia quotes YouTube lawyer Luis Li apologizing to the plaintiff but arguing punitive damages should not be part of a 'social crusade', while the Guardian does not mention this specific defense strategy.
- The Guardian (Article 1) states the New Mexico case sought the maximum $2.2 billion in damages, but the actual awarded amount was $375 million as reported by multiple sources.
- ABC reports Meta's defense emphasized the plaintiff's 'turbulent home life' and played recordings of her mother yelling, but the Guardian does not detail this specific defense tactic.
Source Articles
Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The verdict could mark a âturning point in the global backlash against their platforms' perceived mental health harms to youth....
Unpacking the social media addiction ruling against Meta and YouTube
A US jury has found Instagram and YouTube were designed to be addictive to young users, in a landmark trial experts say could influence thousands of similar lawsuits....
âAccountability has arrivedâ: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co
With two unprecedented trial defeats, big tech firms face crisis akin to that faced by cigarette makers in the 1990s In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world f...
Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds
Six-week trial including whistleblowers and top executives at Meta and YouTube was first of its kind to go to trial Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox Meta a...
It is no fluke that social media platforms are addictive and causing harm. They were designed that way | Van Badham
The findings in two US court cases should embarrass anyone who claimed Australiaâs social media ban was âboomerâ moralising A disdain towards the notion of âconsequenceâ somewhat defines the contempor...
Law firms investigate possible Australian cases after US jury finds Meta and YouTube designed addictive products
Courts in Australia may be willing to hold social media companies accountable for real-world harm, lawyers say Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free...
At last, David has landed a double punch on the tech Goliaths. Now to hit them even harder | Jonathan Freedland
The US court verdicts declaring Meta liable for getting people addicted and ruining lives must be just the start of a global fightback Good news is so rare these days, you donât quite know how to take...
Human rights groups cheer âwatershedâ verdict in social media addiction trial
As many organizations celebrate outcome, some are skeptical as to what it means for privacy protections The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addicti...
'Accountability has arrived': Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The case was brought on by a 20-year-old woman who accused the tech companies of causing harm by deliberately designing addictive platforms which worsened her mental health....
âAccountability has arrivedâ: US jury finds Meta, YouTube guilty in landmark social media addiction trial
Meta and YouTube have just lost a landmark court case about the addictive design of their platforms, a signal that âaccountability has arrivedâ....