US court rulings hold Meta and Google liable for social media addiction and harm to minors
Consensus Summary
Two US juries in May 2024 delivered landmark rulings against Meta and Google, finding them liable for harm caused by the addictive design of their social media platforms. In California, a jury awarded a 20-year-old plaintiff $3 million ($4.3 million AUD) in damages, with Meta liable for 70% and Google for 30%, after she testified her addiction to YouTube and Instagram from childhood led to severe mental health issues including depression, self-harm, and suicidal ideation. The jury determined both companies negligently designed their platforms, knew of the risks to minors, and failed to warn users adequately. The case was the first of over 20 'bellwether' trials, with thousands of similar lawsuits pending. A separate New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading users about platform safety. Both companies plan to appeal. Internal Meta documents revealed executives' awareness of the harm, with one email comparing targeting 11-year-olds to tobacco companies' tactics. The rulings have sparked global attention, with Australian law firms investigating potential cases and the Australian government expanding its under-16 social media ban to include platforms with addictive design features. Human rights groups praised the verdicts, calling for a redesign of platform features to prioritize child safety, while critics warn the rulings could be used to push for restrictive legislation like the Kids Online Safety Act. The cases mark a shift in accountability for tech companies, with experts suggesting the legal precedent could force significant changes to platform design and business models.
â Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- A California jury found Meta and Google liable for $3 million ($4.3 million AUD) in damages in a social media addiction lawsuit on May 22, 2024, with Meta liable for 70% and Google for 30%.
- The plaintiff, a 20-year-old woman (identified as KGM or Kaley GM in court), testified she began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at age nine, becoming addicted to the platforms and experiencing severe mental health issues including depression, self-harm, body dysmorphia, and suicidal ideation.
- The jury found Meta and Google negligent in designing their platforms, knowing or should have known their services posed a danger to minors, and failing to warn users adequately about these risks.
- The jury also found Meta and Google acted with malice, oppression, or fraud, setting the stage for punitive damages to be determined in a later phase of the trial.
- A separate New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million in civil penalties for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading users about platform safety on May 21, 2024.
- Meta and Google have both stated they will appeal the rulings.
- Snapchat and TikTok settled with the plaintiff before the Los Angeles trial began.
- The Los Angeles case was the first of over 20 'bellwether' trials scheduled in the US, with more lawsuits involving over 2,000 plaintiffs pending against Meta, YouTube, TikTok, and Snap.
- The California trial lasted six weeks, with jurors deliberating for nine days before reaching a verdict.
- The New Mexico case involved undercover agents posing as children who reported being contacted by adults for sexualized communication on Meta platforms.
- Internal Meta documents cited in the New Mexico case acknowledged risks of exploitation and harm on platforms, with one email stating 'targeting 11-year-olds feels like tobacco companies a couple decades ago'.
- The Australian government extended its under-16 social media ban to include platforms with addictive design features like infinite scroll and time-limited content in early 2024.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The article references internal Meta documents stating 'the young ones are the best ones' for long-term retention and that targeting teens is a 'gateway' to enticing other family members to join.
- The article compares the social media cases to 'Big Tobacco' and suggests the rulings could lead to class actions and global liability.
- The author argues that the rulings could lead to a 'new age of consequence' for tech companies and that adults should reconsider their own use of addictive platforms.
- The article mentions that the Los Angeles verdict was notable because other platforms (Snapchat, TikTok) settled before trial to avoid setting legal precedents.
- The editorial highlights that the debate about online harms has traditionally focused on abusive and hateful content, but the rulings emphasize the importance of platform design features like infinite scroll and autoplay.
- The editorial argues that the pace of digital innovation outstrips legislative efforts to regulate tech companies, making it difficult for governments to keep up with AI and other emerging technologies.
- The ABC article includes a quote from Laura Marquez-Garrett, a lawyer with the Social Media Victims Law Center, stating the case is 'a vehicle, not an outcome' and that it is historic regardless of future outcomes.
- The ABC article notes that YouTube disputed the plaintiff's usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day on the platform, contradicting her testimony of 'all day long' use.
- The article includes a quote from Meta lawyer Paul Schmidt highlighting the plaintiff's turbulent relationship with her mother as evidence of her pre-existing mental health struggles.
- The article notes that YouTube lawyer Luis Li apologized to the plaintiff but argued punitive damages should not be part of a 'social crusade'.
- The editorial mentions a Guardian investigation was cited in the New Mexico complaint regarding Meta's role in child sex trafficking.
- The editorial references an email from a Meta employee stating 'Instagram had become the leading two-sided marketplace for human trafficking' as evidence of internal awareness of harm.
- The SBS article describes the verdict as a 'turning point in the global backlash against their platforms' perceived mental health harms to youth.'
- The article includes a quote from James Rubinowitz, a trial attorney, stating that the jury's decision was 'not a compromise verdict' but a 'resounding conclusion' based on six weeks of testimony and 44 hours of deliberation.
- The article mentions that the California ruling was not unanimous, with a 10-2 vote in favor of the plaintiff, but emphasizes that this was still a strong verdict.
- The article includes a quote from Mark Lanier, the plaintiff's lawyer, describing the platforms as 'Trojan horses' that 'look wonderful and great but take over.'
- The article includes statements from human rights groups like Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch praising the verdict and calling for a fundamental overhaul of platform design features to ensure child safety.
- The article notes that Fight for the Future, a digital rights group, is skeptical of the verdict being used to push for legislative solutions like the Kids Online Safety Act (KOSA).
- The article includes a quote from Lisa Flynn, chief legal officer at Shine Lawyers, stating the $6 million verdict is a 'watershed moment' signaling courts' willingness to hold tech giants accountable.
- The article mentions that the Australian government is considering a digital duty of care that would require platforms to take reasonable steps to prevent harm.
- The article includes a quote from Frances Haugen, the former Facebook whistleblower, suggesting Meta could face a trillion-dollar liability if many similar cases succeed.
- The article references Sarah Wynn-Williams' memoir, Careless People, which describes how Meta tracked users' emotional states to sell targeted ads, including to girls feeling 'worthless' or 'insecure'.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The Guardian (Van Badham) states that the Los Angeles verdict was notable because other platforms settled before trial to avoid setting legal precedents, while the ABC article does not mention this specific reason for settlement.
- The ABC article reports that YouTube disputed the plaintiff's usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day on the platform, while the plaintiff testified she used it 'all day long' and her lawyers argued the features were designed to hook young users.
- The Guardian (second article) states that the California ruling was not unanimous, with a 10-2 vote in favor of the plaintiff, but the ABC article does not mention the non-unanimous nature of the verdict.
- The Guardian (sixth article) quotes Frances Haugen suggesting Meta could face a trillion-dollar liability if many similar cases succeed, while other sources do not provide a specific financial estimate for potential liabilities beyond the current verdicts.
- The ABC article notes that the plaintiff's mental health struggles were linked to her turbulent home life, while the Guardian (Van Badham) emphasizes the role of platform design in causing harm, stating that the jury found Meta's actions 'unconscionable' and 'deceptive'.
Source Articles
âAccountability has arrivedâ: US jury finds Meta, YouTube guilty in landmark social media addiction trial
Meta and YouTube have just lost a landmark court case about the addictive design of their platforms, a signal that âaccountability has arrivedâ....
The Guardian view on social media in the dock: tech bros move fast â society is trying to catch up | Editorial
Two court cases have shown how companies can be forced to take responsibility for their impact on public health Debate about online harms has tended to focus on abusive and hateful content. But the fo...
Law firms investigate possible Australian cases after US jury finds Meta and YouTube designed addictive products
Courts in Australia may be willing to hold social media companies accountable for real-world harm, lawyers say Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free...
Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The verdict could mark a âturning point in the global backlash against their platforms' perceived mental health harms to youth....
'Accountability has arrived': Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The case was brought on by a 20-year-old woman who accused the tech companies of causing harm by deliberately designing addictive platforms which worsened her mental health....
âAccountability has arrivedâ: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co
With two unprecedented trial defeats, big tech firms face crisis akin to that faced by cigarette makers in the 1990s In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world f...
Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds
Six-week trial including whistleblowers and top executives at Meta and YouTube was first of its kind to go to trial Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox Meta a...
It is no fluke that social media platforms are addictive and causing harm. They were designed that way | Van Badham
The findings in two US court cases should embarrass anyone who claimed Australiaâs social media ban was âboomerâ moralising A disdain towards the notion of âconsequenceâ somewhat defines the contempor...
At last, David has landed a double punch on the tech Goliaths. Now to hit them even harder | Jonathan Freedland
The US court verdicts declaring Meta liable for getting people addicted and ruining lives must be just the start of a global fightback Good news is so rare these days, you donât quite know how to take...
Unpacking the social media addiction ruling against Meta and YouTube
A US jury has found Instagram and YouTube were designed to be addictive to young users, in a landmark trial experts say could influence thousands of similar lawsuits....
Human rights groups cheer âwatershedâ verdict in social media addiction trial
As many organizations celebrate outcome, some are skeptical as to what it means for privacy protections The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addicti...