US court rulings hold Meta and Google liable for social media addiction and harm to minors
Consensus Summary
Two US juries in May 2024 delivered landmark rulings against Meta and Google, holding them liable for designing addictive social media platforms that harmed young users. In California, a jury awarded a 20-year-old plaintiff $3 million ($4.3 million AUD) after she testified her addiction to YouTube (since age six) and Instagram (since age nine) worsened her mental health, including depression, self-harm, and body dysmorphia. The jury found both companies negligent and liable for failing to warn users of risks, with Meta assigned 70% of blame. Separately, a New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading users about platform safety. Internal Meta documents revealed executivesâ awareness of harms, including targeting 11-year-olds and acknowledging Instagramâs role in human trafficking. Both companies plan to appeal. Over 20 similar 'bellwether' trials are pending, with thousands of plaintiffs, including families and school districts, seeking accountability. The rulings mark a shift in public perception and legal precedent, drawing comparisons to the tobacco industryâs reckoning, though critics warn appeals and business models could delay meaningful change. Global reactions, including Australiaâs under-16 social media ban, reflect growing calls for regulation and redesign of addictive platform features.
â Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- A California jury found Meta and Google liable for $3 million ($4.3 million AUD) in damages in a social media addiction lawsuit on May 22, 2024, with Meta liable for 70% and Google for 30%.
- The plaintiff, a 20-year-old woman (identified as KGM or Kaley GM), testified she began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at age nine, and became addicted to the platforms, leading to mental health issues including depression, self-harm, body dysmorphia, and suicidal ideation.
- The jury found Meta and Google negligent in designing their platforms and failing to warn users about risks to minors, with evidence showing they knew or should have known of the dangers.
- A New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million in civil penalties for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading users about safety on Facebook and Instagram, with the case filed by the stateâs attorney general RaĂșl Torrez.
- Both Meta and Google have stated they will appeal the rulings, with Meta calling the California verdict a 'referendum' and Google stating it disagrees with the outcome.
- Snapchat and TikTok settled with the plaintiff before the trial began, with confidential terms reported in multiple sources.
- The California case was the first of over 20 'bellwether' trials scheduled in the US, with additional cases involving more than 2,000 plaintiffs including families and school districts.
- Internal Meta documents cited in court included an email stating 'targeting 11-year-olds feels like tobacco companies a couple decades ago' and another noting Instagram was a 'two-sided marketplace for human trafficking'.
- The Los Angeles trial lasted six weeks and included testimony from whistleblowers, executives, and expert witnesses on addiction and social media harm.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Van Badham argues the rulings could set a precedent for global class actions and likens the situation to 'social mediaâs Big Tobacco moment'.
- The Guardian editorial notes internal Meta emails exposing executives' cavalier approach to child safety, including a comment about Instagram being a 'two-sided marketplace for human trafficking'.
- The Guardian highlights Australiaâs under-16 social media ban and the governmentâs push for a 'digital duty of care' as part of the broader accountability shift.
- The Guardian mentions the US$2.2 billion maximum damages sought by New Mexicoâs attorney general in the child exploitation case, though the jury awarded $375 million.
- ABC reports that YouTube disputed the plaintiffâs usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day on the platform, contradicting her testimony.
- ABC notes that the plaintiffâs lawyers argued the platforms' design features (infinite scroll, autoplay, notifications) were intentionally engineered to 'hook' young users.
- Newscom Australia quotes Metaâs spokesperson as saying the plaintiffâs mental health issues were due to a 'turbulent home life' and not social media use, a claim disputed by the jury.
- The article emphasizes the potential for punitive damages beyond the $3 million compensatory award, stating the jury found Meta and Google acted with malice, oppression, or fraud.
- SBS briefly summarizes the verdict as a 'turning point in the global backlash against social media harm to youth' without additional specific details.
- Jonathan Freedland compares the rulings to Metaâs 'asbestos moment,' suggesting potential trillion-dollar liabilities if similar cases succeed, citing whistleblower Frances Haugenâs estimates.
- Freedland references Sarah Wynn-Williamsâ memoir *Careless People*, detailing how Meta monetized teenage girls' body image insecurities by targeting them with ads when they deleted selfies.
- The column argues the rulings could force Meta to redesign its platforms, threatening its business model, and highlights the appeal process as a potential hurdle.
- Van Badham explicitly states the jury found Metaâs actions 'unconscionable' and that the platforms were designed with 'infinite scroll, algorithmic recommendations, autoplay/engagement loops' to maximize youth engagement.
- She notes that Metaâs internal documents acknowledged risks of exploitation and harm, which were used as evidence in court.
- The editorial argues that the rulings reveal shifting attitudes and that internal documents exposing executives' attitudes are now 'in the public square,' aiding future advocacy efforts.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The Guardian and ABC report that the plaintiff used YouTube from age six and Instagram from age nine, but Newscom Australia emphasizes she began using Instagram at age nine and YouTube at age six without additional conflicting details.
- Metaâs spokesperson in Newscom Australia claims the plaintiffâs mental health issues were unrelated to social media, while the jury and other sources found Meta liable for negligence in causing harm through platform design.
- YouTube disputed the plaintiffâs usage records in ABC, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day, while the plaintiff and her lawyers testified she used the platform extensively (up to 16 hours daily in some sources).
- The Guardian mentions the New Mexico jury awarded $375 million, while the Newscom Australia article states the state sought the maximum $2.2 billion but the jury awarded $375 million (consistent but adds context).
- Freedlandâs Guardian column suggests potential trillion-dollar liabilities if similar cases succeed, while other sources focus on the $3 million compensatory award and pending punitive damages.
Source Articles
'Accountability has arrived': Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The case was brought on by a 20-year-old woman who accused the tech companies of causing harm by deliberately designing addictive platforms which worsened her mental health....
The Guardian view on social media in the dock: tech bros move fast â society is trying to catch up | Editorial
Two court cases have shown how companies can be forced to take responsibility for their impact on public health Debate about online harms has tended to focus on abusive and hateful content. But the fo...
Human rights groups cheer âwatershedâ verdict in social media addiction trial
As many organizations celebrate outcome, some are skeptical as to what it means for privacy protections The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addicti...
Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds
Six-week trial including whistleblowers and top executives at Meta and YouTube was first of its kind to go to trial Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox Meta a...
Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The verdict could mark a âturning point in the global backlash against their platforms' perceived mental health harms to youth....
âAccountability has arrivedâ: US jury finds Meta, YouTube guilty in landmark social media addiction trial
Meta and YouTube have just lost a landmark court case about the addictive design of their platforms, a signal that âaccountability has arrivedâ....
It is no fluke that social media platforms are addictive and causing harm. They were designed that way | Van Badham
The findings in two US court cases should embarrass anyone who claimed Australiaâs social media ban was âboomerâ moralising A disdain towards the notion of âconsequenceâ somewhat defines the contempor...
Unpacking the social media addiction ruling against Meta and YouTube
A US jury has found Instagram and YouTube were designed to be addictive to young users, in a landmark trial experts say could influence thousands of similar lawsuits....
âAccountability has arrivedâ: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co
With two unprecedented trial defeats, big tech firms face crisis akin to that faced by cigarette makers in the 1990s In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world f...
Law firms investigate possible Australian cases after US jury finds Meta and YouTube designed addictive products
Courts in Australia may be willing to hold social media companies accountable for real-world harm, lawyers say Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free...
At last, David has landed a double punch on the tech Goliaths. Now to hit them even harder | Jonathan Freedland
The US court verdicts declaring Meta liable for getting people addicted and ruining lives must be just the start of a global fightback Good news is so rare these days, you donât quite know how to take...