US juries find Meta and YouTube liable for addictive social media design harming young users
Consensus Summary
Two US juries in California and New Mexico delivered landmark rulings against Meta and YouTube in early March 2024, finding the tech giants liable for designing addictive platforms that harmed young users. The California jury awarded a 20-year-old plaintiff $3 million ($4.3 million including punitive damages pending) after she testified she became addicted to YouTube at age six and Instagram at nine, leading to severe mental health issues including depression, self-harm, and body dysmorphia. The jury found both companies negligent, with Meta assigned 70% liability for deliberately engineering addictive features like infinite scroll, autoplay, and notifications. A New Mexico jury separately ordered Meta to pay $375 million for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading users about platform safety, citing internal documents that revealed Metaâs awareness of harms and comparisons to tobacco industry tactics. Both cases are part of over 20 'bellwether' trials and thousands of pending lawsuits, with Meta and YouTube vowing to appeal. The rulings mark a shift in accountability, challenging the long-standing legal shield (Section 230) that protected platforms from liability for user-generated content. While the awards are seen as symbolic victories for plaintiffs, critics argue the financial penalties are insufficient to force meaningful redesigns of addictive algorithms. Internationally, the cases have spurred discussions about stricter regulations, with Australia and Indonesia implementing bans on social media for under-16s and the UK considering similar measures. The verdicts also highlight internal Meta documents exposing executivesâ knowledge of harms, including emails equating targeting 11-year-olds to tobacco industry practices and evidence of platforms facilitating human trafficking.
â Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- A California jury in Los Angeles found Meta (Instagram) and Google (YouTube) liable for negligence in a social media addiction lawsuit on Wednesday, 13 March 2024, awarding $3 million ($4.3 million total including punitive damages pending) to a 20-year-old plaintiff (KGM).
- The jury found both companies knew or should have known their platforms posed dangers to minors and failed to warn users adequately, with Meta assigned 70% liability and YouTube 30%.
- The plaintiff testified she began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at nine, becoming addicted to the platforms and developing depression, self-harm, body dysmorphic disorder, and social phobia by age 13.
- A New Mexico jury on Tuesday, 12 March 2024, ordered Meta to pay $375 million in civil penalties for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading users about platform safety.
- The California case is the first of over 20 'bellwether' trials scheduled in the US, with thousands of similar lawsuits pending against Meta, YouTube, TikTok, and Snapchat.
- Meta and YouTube have both stated they will appeal the verdicts, with Meta calling the California ruling 'not unanimous' (10-2 in favor of the plaintiff).
- Internal Meta documents cited in the New Mexico case included an email stating 'targeting 11-year-olds feels like tobacco companies a couple decades ago' and evidence of Meta knowing its platforms were used for human trafficking.
- The California plaintiff's lawyers argued that features like infinite scroll, autoplay, notifications, and 'like' counts were deliberately designed to create addiction in young users.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Former Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen told The Guardian Meta could face a trillion-dollar liability if similar cases succeed, calling it an 'asbestos moment'.
- Sarah Wynn-Williams, another whistleblower, revealed in her 2025 memoir Careless People that Meta tracked teenage girls' selfie deletions to sell targeted beauty ads during moments of insecurity.
- The Guardian highlighted that Meta's internal documents showed executives dismissing concerns about body image harms on Instagram, with Mark Zuckerberg rejecting paternalistic limits on cosmetic filters.
- The article noted that the UK government is considering restricting children's screen time and Australia has already banned social media for under-16s, with Indonesia following suit.
- The Guardian mentioned that the California jury found Meta and YouTube acted with malice, oppression, and fraud in the harm caused to the plaintiff.
- ABC reported that YouTube disputed the plaintiff's usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day on the platform despite her testimony of constant use.
- ABC noted that Snapchat and TikTok settled with the plaintiff before the trial began.
- ABC included a quote from Lisa Given (RMIT professor) stating the lawsuit is 'unique' and will influence thousands of pending US lawsuits.
- Newscorp Australia quoted Jasmine Enberg of Scalable saying '$3 million is a slap on the wrist' for Meta and YouTube, but redesigning products could threaten their business models.
- The article included a direct quote from YouTube's Luis Li apologizing to the plaintiff but emphasizing punitive damages should not be part of a 'social crusade'.
- Newscorp Australia highlighted that Meta's lawyer Paul Schmidt played a recording of the plaintiff's mother yelling at her during closing arguments.
- The Guardian's Jonathan Freedland compared the cases to the 'big tobacco moment,' suggesting Meta could face bankruptcy if liability accumulates to trillions.
- The Guardian reported that the UK prime minister Keir Starmer cited the LA verdict in support of potential UK social media bans for under-16s and restrictions on addictive features.
- The Guardian mentioned that the New Mexico case included testimony from undercover agents posing as children who were contacted by adults for sexualized communication on Meta platforms.
- SBS headline emphasized the verdict could mark a 'turning point' in the global backlash against social media's mental health harms to youth.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The Guardian and ABC both report the plaintiff began using YouTube at age six, but ABC notes YouTube disputed her usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day on the platform despite her testimony of constant use.
- Meta's spokesperson in The Guardian stated the plaintiff's mental health issues were 'separate from her social media usage,' while the plaintiff's lawyers argued social media was the primary cause of her harm.
- The Guardian reports the California jury was 10-2 in favor of the plaintiff, while Newscorp Australia does not specify the jury's split but focuses on the $3 million award.
- The Guardian mentions punitive damages were recommended after the verdict but does not specify the amount, while Newscorp Australia states punitive damages are pending but not yet awarded.
- The Guardian and ABC both report Meta will appeal, but The Guardian emphasizes the 'big tobacco' comparison and potential trillion-dollar liabilities, while Newscorp Australia frames the $3 million award as a 'slap on the wrist' for Meta.
Source Articles
Human rights groups cheer âwatershedâ verdict in social media addiction trial
As many organizations celebrate outcome, some are skeptical as to what it means for privacy protections The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addicti...
Law firms investigate possible Australian cases after US jury finds Meta and YouTube designed addictive products
Courts in Australia may be willing to hold social media companies accountable for real-world harm, lawyers say Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free...
It is no fluke that social media platforms are addictive and causing harm. They were designed that way | Van Badham
The findings in two US court cases should embarrass anyone who claimed Australiaâs social media ban was âboomerâ moralising A disdain towards the notion of âconsequenceâ somewhat defines the contempor...
âThe era of invincibility is overâ: the week that brought big tech to heel
Ruling that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addictive products marks possible watershed moment for social media The young woman at the heart of what has been called the tech industryâs âbig tob...
Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds
Six-week trial including whistleblowers and top executives at Meta and YouTube was first of its kind to go to trial Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox Meta a...
'Accountability has arrived': Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The case was brought on by a 20-year-old woman who accused the tech companies of causing harm by deliberately designing addictive platforms which worsened her mental health....
How Metaâs victim-blaming failed to sway jurors in landmark social media addiction trial
Aggressive strategy and loss in the trial highlight a problem for tech firms: a widespread distrust of social media companies When Meta , the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, sought to defend...
The Guardian view on social media in the dock: tech bros move fast â society is trying to catch up | Editorial
Two court cases have shown how companies can be forced to take responsibility for their impact on public health Debate about online harms has tended to focus on abusive and hateful content. But the fo...
âAccountability has arrivedâ: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co
With two unprecedented trial defeats, big tech firms face crisis akin to that faced by cigarette makers in the 1990s In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world f...
Unpacking the social media addiction ruling against Meta and YouTube
A US jury has found Instagram and YouTube were designed to be addictive to young users, in a landmark trial experts say could influence thousands of similar lawsuits....
At last, David has landed a double punch on the tech Goliaths. Now to hit them even harder | Jonathan Freedland
The US court verdicts declaring Meta liable for getting people addicted and ruining lives must be just the start of a global fightback Good news is so rare these days, you donât quite know how to take...
Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The verdict could mark a âturning point in the global backlash against their platforms' perceived mental health harms to youth....
âAccountability has arrivedâ: US jury finds Meta, YouTube guilty in landmark social media addiction trial
Meta and YouTube have just lost a landmark court case about the addictive design of their platforms, a signal that âaccountability has arrivedâ....