US juries find Meta and YouTube liable for designing addictive platforms harming young users
Consensus Summary
Two US juries in California and New Mexico delivered landmark rulings against Meta and YouTube in June 2024, finding the tech giants liable for designing addictive platforms that harmed young users. The California jury awarded a 20-year-old plaintiff $3 million in compensatory damages, with Meta (70%) and YouTube (30%) found negligent for failing to warn users about risks and deliberately engineering addictive features like infinite scroll and autoplay. The plaintiff testified she became addicted to YouTube at age six and Instagram at nine, leading to severe mental health issues including depression, self-harm, and body dysmorphic disorder. The New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading consumers about platform safety. Both cases are part of over 20 'bellwether' trials testing whether social media companies can be held accountable for harm caused by their platforms. Meta and YouTube plan to appeal, while advocates compare the rulings to the tobacco industryâs legal battles, arguing these cases could force redesigns of addictive features and set global precedents. The verdicts have sparked global attention, with Australia and Indonesia implementing social media bans for under-16s and law firms investigating potential cases in other jurisdictions. Critics highlight Metaâs defense strategy of victim-blaming, focusing on the plaintiffâs home life rather than the companyâs role in designing harmful products.
â Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- A California jury found Meta and YouTube liable for negligence in a social media addiction lawsuit on June 12, 2024, awarding $3 million ($4.3 million AUD) in compensatory damages to the plaintiff, a 20-year-old woman identified as KGM.
- The jury determined that Meta (70%) and YouTube (30%) knew or should have known their services posed a danger to minors and failed to warn users adequately, with Metaâs negligence found to be a substantial factor in causing harm to KGM.
- The plaintiff testified she began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at age nine, becoming addicted to the platforms and experiencing depression, self-harm, body dysmorphic disorder, and social phobia by age 13.
- A separate New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million in civil penalties on June 11, 2024, for misleading consumers about the safety of its platforms and enabling child sexual exploitation.
- Meta and YouTube both plan to appeal the California verdict, with Meta stating it 'respectfully disagrees' and Google/YouTube calling the case a 'misunderstanding' of their platforms.
- The California case is the first of over 20 'bellwether' trials scheduled in the US, with thousands of similar lawsuits pending against Meta, YouTube, TikTok, and Snapchat.
- The plaintiffâs lawyers argued that features like infinite scroll, autoplay, and notifications were deliberately designed to hook young users, comparing the case to the tobacco industryâs legal battles.
- The New Mexico lawsuit included evidence of Metaâs internal documents acknowledging risks of exploitation and harm on its platforms, including an email stating 'targeting 11-year-olds feels like tobacco companies a couple decades ago'.
- The California jury found Meta and YouTube acted with malice, oppression, or fraud, setting the stage for potential punitive damages in a later phase of the trial.
- Snapchat and TikTok settled with the plaintiff before the California trial began, avoiding the discovery of liabilities and precedents from the trial.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The Guardian editorial (Article 3) described the verdicts as a 'momentous decision' but noted that the pace of digital innovation outstrips legislative efforts to regulate tech companies, calling for a precautionary approach to children's safety.
- Article 6 highlights that Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch praised the verdict as a 'watershed moment' for corporate accountability, urging tech companies to redesign platforms to prioritize safety over engagement.
- Article 8 (Freedland) references Frances Haugenâs claim that Meta could face a trillion-dollar liability if similar cases succeed, citing her comparison to the 'asbestos moment' for the company.
- Article 9 (Van Badham) notes that tech platforms borrowed from behavioral techniques used by poker machines and the tobacco industry to maximize youth engagement and drive advertising revenue.
- Article 12 details Metaâs defense strategy of victim-blaming, including highlighting KGMâs motherâs parenting issues and quoting therapy notes to argue social media was not the primary cause of her mental health struggles.
- ABC (Article 10) reports that the plaintiff was awarded $4.3 million in damages, with Meta liable for 70% and Google for 30%, and that the jury deliberated for nine days before reaching a verdict.
- ABC (Article 11) states that the plaintiffâs usage records showed she spent up to 16 hours a day on social media, though YouTube disputed this, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day on its platform.
- News.com.au (Article 5) reports the jury awarded $3 million in compensatory damages and found Meta and YouTube liable for negligence, malice, and fraud, with punitive damages to be decided later.
- SBS (Article 13) emphasizes the verdict could mark a 'turning point in the global backlash against social media platforms' perceived mental health harms to youth.
- Article 7 (Guardian) notes that the jury deliberated for nearly nine days and awarded $3 million in compensatory damages, with punitive damages to be determined in a later phase.
- Article 1 (Guardian) states that the California jury found Meta and YouTube acted with malice, oppression, and fraud in a 10-2 vote, a finding that could influence future cases and set a precedent for holding tech companies accountable.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The Guardian (Article 1) reports the California jury awarded $6 million in damages, while ABC (Article 10) and News.com.au (Article 5) state the award was $3 million ($4.3 million AUD).
- YouTubeâs lawyers in the California trial disputed the plaintiffâs usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute per day on its platform (ABC, Article 11), while the plaintiff testified she used it 'all day long' and spent up to 16 hours a day (ABC, Article 11).
- The Guardian (Article 1) states the California jury found Meta and YouTube liable for $6 million, with Meta paying 70% and YouTube 30%, while ABC (Article 10) reports the compensatory damages were $3 million ($4.3 million AUD) with the same liability split.
- Article 1 (Guardian) mentions the California juryâs verdict was 10-2 in favor of the plaintiff, while Article 12 (Guardian) states the jury voted 10-2 in favor of the plaintiffs but does not specify the context of the vote.
- The Guardian (Article 1) reports the New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million, while ABC (Article 10) states the New Mexico jury ordered $375 million in civil penalties.
Source Articles
âAccountability has arrivedâ: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co
With two unprecedented trial defeats, big tech firms face crisis akin to that faced by cigarette makers in the 1990s In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world f...
It is no fluke that social media platforms are addictive and causing harm. They were designed that way | Van Badham
The findings in two US court cases should embarrass anyone who claimed Australiaâs social media ban was âboomerâ moralising A disdain towards the notion of âconsequenceâ somewhat defines the contempor...
Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds
Six-week trial including whistleblowers and top executives at Meta and YouTube was first of its kind to go to trial Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox Meta a...
At last, David has landed a double punch on the tech Goliaths. Now to hit them even harder | Jonathan Freedland
The US court verdicts declaring Meta liable for getting people addicted and ruining lives must be just the start of a global fightback Good news is so rare these days, you donât quite know how to take...
Law firms investigate possible Australian cases after US jury finds Meta and YouTube designed addictive products
Courts in Australia may be willing to hold social media companies accountable for real-world harm, lawyers say Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free...
Unpacking the social media addiction ruling against Meta and YouTube
A US jury has found Instagram and YouTube were designed to be addictive to young users, in a landmark trial experts say could influence thousands of similar lawsuits....
'Accountability has arrived': Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The case was brought on by a 20-year-old woman who accused the tech companies of causing harm by deliberately designing addictive platforms which worsened her mental health....
The Guardian view on social media in the dock: tech bros move fast â society is trying to catch up | Editorial
Two court cases have shown how companies can be forced to take responsibility for their impact on public health Debate about online harms has tended to focus on abusive and hateful content. But the fo...
How Metaâs victim-blaming failed to sway jurors in landmark social media addiction trial
Aggressive strategy and loss in the trial highlight a problem for tech firms: a widespread distrust of social media companies When Meta , the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, sought to defend...
âAccountability has arrivedâ: US jury finds Meta, YouTube guilty in landmark social media addiction trial
Meta and YouTube have just lost a landmark court case about the addictive design of their platforms, a signal that âaccountability has arrivedâ....
Human rights groups cheer âwatershedâ verdict in social media addiction trial
As many organizations celebrate outcome, some are skeptical as to what it means for privacy protections The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addicti...
âThe era of invincibility is overâ: the week that brought big tech to heel
Ruling that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addictive products marks possible watershed moment for social media The young woman at the heart of what has been called the tech industryâs âbig tob...
Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The verdict could mark a âturning point in the global backlash against their platforms' perceived mental health harms to youth....