US juries find Meta and YouTube liable for harm caused by addictive social media design
Consensus Summary
Two US juries in California and New Mexico have found Meta and YouTube liable for harm caused by their social media platforms, marking a significant shift in accountability for tech companies. In California, a jury awarded $6 million in damages to a 20-year-old plaintiff (KGM) who alleged that YouTube and Instagram were designed to be addictive, leading to severe mental health issues like depression, self-harm, and body dysmorphic disorder. KGM testified she began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at age nine, with her addiction worsening her well-being. The jury found Meta and YouTube negligent and liable for malice, setting the stage for punitive damages. The California case is the first of over 20 'bellwether' trials testing similar claims, with the next trial scheduled for July. Separately, a New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading users about platform safety, citing internal documents that revealed executives’ knowledge of harms. Both companies plan to appeal the verdicts. The cases draw parallels to the tobacco industry’s legal battles, with plaintiffs arguing that features like infinite scroll and autoplay were intentionally designed to hook users. Meta’s defense blamed the plaintiff’s mental health issues on her home life, but jurors rejected this argument. The verdicts have sparked global attention, with law firms in Australia investigating potential cases and governments considering stricter regulations, such as bans on social media for under-16s and digital duty of care laws. Human rights groups and advocates celebrate the rulings as a watershed moment, urging tech companies to redesign their platforms to prioritize user safety over engagement.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- A California jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages in a New Mexico case over claims Meta enabled child sexual exploitation and misled users about platform safety (Guardian, ABC, SBS, Guardian editorial).
- A California jury found Meta and YouTube liable for negligence and awarded $6 million in damages to a 20-year-old plaintiff (KGM) who alleged addiction to YouTube and Instagram caused mental health harm (Guardian, NewscomaU, ABC, SBS, Guardian).
- The California jury split damages 70% to Meta and 30% to YouTube, with Meta liable for $4.2 million and YouTube for $1.8 million (Guardian, ABC, Guardian).
- The plaintiff (KGM) testified she began using YouTube at age six and Instagram at age nine, and developed depression, self-harm, body dysmorphic disorder, and social phobia by age 13 (Guardian, ABC, Guardian, Guardian).
- Jurors in the California case found Meta and YouTube acted with malice, oppression, or fraud, setting the stage for punitive damages (Guardian, NewscomaU, Guardian).
- Meta and YouTube both plan to appeal the verdicts (Guardian, NewscomaU, ABC, Guardian).
- The California case is the first of over 20 'bellwether' trials testing liability for social media addiction (Guardian, ABC, Guardian, Guardian).
- A New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million in damages for enabling child sexual exploitation and misleading users about safety (Guardian, ABC, Guardian editorial, Guardian).
- The New Mexico case involved undercover sting operations exposing Meta’s failure to stop predators on its platforms (Guardian, Guardian).
- Meta’s internal documents revealed executives discussing targeting 11-year-olds and comparing practices to tobacco companies (Guardian, Guardian, Guardian).
- The plaintiff’s lawyers compared the cases to the tobacco industry’s legal battles over addictive products (Guardian, Guardian, Guardian).
- The California trial lasted six weeks and included testimony from Meta and YouTube executives, whistleblowers, and expert witnesses (Guardian, Guardian, Guardian).
- Meta’s defense argued the plaintiff’s mental health issues stemmed from her home life and bullying, not social media (Guardian, ABC, Guardian).
- The California jury deliberated for 44 hours before reaching a 10-2 verdict in favor of the plaintiff (Guardian, Guardian).
- The next California bellwether trial is scheduled for July (Guardian, Guardian).
- A separate federal lawsuit with hundreds of plaintiffs is set to begin in San Francisco in June (Guardian, Guardian).
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Frances Haugen, a former Facebook whistleblower, suggested Meta could face a trillion-dollar liability if thousands of similar cases succeed (Guardian).
- Sarah Wynn-Williams, another Facebook whistleblower, revealed Meta’s internal presentation bragging about exploiting teenage girls' emotional states to sell cosmetics (Guardian).
- The Guardian editorial compared the cases to the tobacco industry’s reckoning and called for a precautionary approach to children’s digital safety (Guardian editorial).
- The Guardian reported that Meta’s internal email stated 'targetting 11 year olds feels like tobacco companies a couple decades ago' (Guardian).
- The Guardian highlighted that Meta’s Adam Mosseri testified that social media was not 'clinically addictive' during the trial (Guardian).
- The Guardian mentioned that the UK government is considering a social media ban for under-16s and restrictions on addictive features like infinite scroll (Guardian).
- The Guardian noted that the UK’s online safety minister met with 10-11-year-olds who described social media as addictive and disruptive to sleep (Guardian).
- The Guardian reported that Meta’s spokesperson emphasized that KGM’s mental health issues were linked to 'profoundly complex' teen mental health, not social media (Guardian).
- The Guardian included a quote from Meta’s spokesperson: 'We will continue to defend ourselves vigorously as every case is different' (Guardian).
- The Guardian stated that the California ruling was 'a referendum from a jury to an entire industry' (Guardian).
- The Guardian reported that the New Mexico case cited a Guardian investigation in the complaint (Guardian).
- The Guardian mentioned that the New Mexico trial’s second phase (beginning May) could impose platform changes on Meta (Guardian).
- The Guardian noted that the Australian government updated its definition of 'social media platforms' to include those with addictive features like infinite scroll (Guardian).
- The Guardian reported that the Greens in Australia called for new laws to prevent harm before it happens, not just after (Guardian).
- The Guardian included a quote from Tech Oversight Project’s Sacha Haworth: 'They’re really truly pulling from big tobacco’s playbook' (Guardian).
- The Guardian mentioned that Meta whistleblower Arturo Béjar testified about internal documents showing Meta’s knowledge of harms (Guardian).
- The Guardian reported that the UK’s prime minister, Keir Starmer, cited the LA verdict in support of potential UK social media restrictions (Guardian).
- The Guardian noted that the Australian government is considering a 'digital duty of care' for platforms (Guardian).
- The NewscomaU article stated the $3 million award was 'a slap on the wrist' for Meta and YouTube, given their massive ad revenue (NewscomaU).
- The article included a quote from YouTube’s Luis Li apologizing to the plaintiff but emphasizing punitive damages should relate to the specific case (NewscomaU).
- The article noted that YouTube disputed the plaintiff’s usage records, claiming she averaged less than a minute a day on 'addictive' features (NewscomaU).
- The article stated that two further bellwether trials were expected in Los Angeles, with outcomes influencing settlement negotiations (NewscomaU).
- ABC reported that a 20-year-old plaintiff was awarded $4.3 million in damages (ABC).
- ABC included a quote from Laura Marquez-Garrett, a lawyer with the Social Media Victims Law Center, stating the case was 'a vehicle, not an outcome' (ABC).
- ABC mentioned that Snap and TikTok had settled with the plaintiff before the trial began (ABC).
- ABC reported that Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg testified in the trial and was described by jurors as inconsistent (ABC).
- ABC included a quote from Communications Minister Anika Wells sharing a post on the verdict, calling it a 'drum beat against social media harm' (ABC).
- ABC noted that the Australian government extended the social media ban to include platforms with addictive features like algorithms and infinite scroll (ABC).
- SBS reported that the verdict could mark a 'turning point in the global backlash against social media's perceived mental health harms to youth' (SBS).
- No specific details from The Age in the provided articles.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The Guardian and ABC report the plaintiff was awarded $6 million in damages, while NewscomaU states the award was $3 million (with $4.3 million including punitive damages).
- The Guardian and ABC report the plaintiff was awarded $4.2 million from Meta and $1.8 million from YouTube, while NewscomaU states Meta was liable for $2.1 million and YouTube for $900,000.
- The Guardian reports the California jury deliberated for 44 hours, while ABC does not mention the duration of deliberations.
- The Guardian and ABC report that Meta’s defense blamed the plaintiff’s mental health issues on her home life and bullying, but the Guardian also reports that the plaintiff’s mother was present for the entire trial and described her as 'trying her best,' not abusive.
- The Guardian reports that Meta’s internal documents included an email stating 'targetting 11 year olds feels like tobacco companies a couple decades ago,' while NewscomaU does not mention this specific quote.
Source Articles
‘Accountability has arrived’: US jury finds Meta, YouTube guilty in landmark social media addiction trial
Meta and YouTube have just lost a landmark court case about the addictive design of their platforms, a signal that “accountability has arrived”....
Human rights groups cheer ‘watershed’ verdict in social media addiction trial
As many organizations celebrate outcome, some are skeptical as to what it means for privacy protections The verdict in a landmark social media trial that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addicti...
Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The verdict could mark a turning point in the global backlash against their platforms' perceived mental health harms to youth....
How Meta’s victim-blaming failed to sway jurors in landmark social media addiction trial
Aggressive strategy and loss in the trial highlight a problem for tech firms: a widespread distrust of social media companies When Meta , the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, sought to defend...
'Accountability has arrived': Meta and Google found liable in landmark social media addiction lawsuit
The case was brought on by a 20-year-old woman who accused the tech companies of causing harm by deliberately designing addictive platforms which worsened her mental health....
Unpacking the social media addiction ruling against Meta and YouTube
A US jury has found Instagram and YouTube were designed to be addictive to young users, in a landmark trial experts say could influence thousands of similar lawsuits....
Law firms investigate possible Australian cases after US jury finds Meta and YouTube designed addictive products
Courts in Australia may be willing to hold social media companies accountable for real-world harm, lawyers say Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free...
‘Accountability has arrived’: dual US court losses show shifting tide against Meta and co
With two unprecedented trial defeats, big tech firms face crisis akin to that faced by cigarette makers in the 1990s In the span of just two days, the most powerful social media company in the world f...
At last, David has landed a double punch on the tech Goliaths. Now to hit them even harder | Jonathan Freedland
The US court verdicts declaring Meta liable for getting people addicted and ruining lives must be just the start of a global fightback Good news is so rare these days, you don’t quite know how to take...
The Guardian view on social media in the dock: tech bros move fast – society is trying to catch up | Editorial
Two court cases have shown how companies can be forced to take responsibility for their impact on public health Debate about online harms has tended to focus on abusive and hateful content. But the fo...
Meta and YouTube designed addictive products that harmed young people, jury finds
Six-week trial including whistleblowers and top executives at Meta and YouTube was first of its kind to go to trial Sign up for the Breaking News US email to get newsletter alerts in your inbox Meta a...
‘The era of invincibility is over’: the week that brought big tech to heel
Ruling that Meta and YouTube deliberately designed addictive products marks possible watershed moment for social media The young woman at the heart of what has been called the tech industry’s “big tob...
It is no fluke that social media platforms are addictive and causing harm. They were designed that way | Van Badham
The findings in two US court cases should embarrass anyone who claimed Australia’s social media ban was ‘boomer’ moralising A disdain towards the notion of “consequence” somewhat defines the contempor...