Two men accused of sexual assault after allegedly raping a drunk woman picked up from a Darwin nightclub
Consensus Summary
Two men, Panormitis Charalampis and Michael Vrouvis, were acquitted of four counts each of sexual intercourse without consent after a two-week trial in the Northern Territory Supreme Court. The case centered on whether a woman, severely intoxicated with a blood alcohol level between 0.1 and 0.15, was capable of consenting to sexual activity after being picked up from a Darwin nightclub at 3:30am on January 14, 2024. The prosecution argued the men took advantage of her high intoxication, while the defence claimed she initiated the encounters and was not too drunk to consent. The jury found the men not guilty, concluding there was reasonable doubt about her capacity to consent. The trial included conflicting accounts of the womanâs memory, her interactions with the men, and the menâs motives, with CCTV footage showing her struggling to walk and being carried into her apartment. The defence highlighted inconsistencies in her testimony, including her later realization that the men were not her Uber drivers, and argued her fragmented memory undermined her claims of non-consent.
â Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- Panormitis Charalampis and Michael Vrouvis are on trial in the Northern Territory Supreme Court for four counts each of sexual intercourse without consent against a woman (identity suppressed) in January 2024
- The woman was waiting for an Uber outside Mayberry nightclub in Darwinâs CBD at 3:30am on January 14, 2024, when she was picked up by the two men
- CCTV footage shows the woman leaving Mayberry at 3:30am and being picked up by the men, who she believed were her Uber drivers
- The womanâs blood alcohol concentration was estimated between 0.1 and 0.15 (high to severe intoxication) when she arrived at her apartment with the men
- The men and the woman do not dispute that sexual activity occurred in the apartment, but the central issue is whether she was capable of consenting
- The trial lasted approximately two weeks, with closing arguments delivered by Crown Prosecutor Rebecca Everitt and defence lawyers James Stuchbery, Beth Wild, and Stephen Robson SC
- The jury deliberated for nearly seven hours before acquitting both men on all charges on Friday
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Defence lawyer Beth Wild argued the woman âtruly believedâ she was having a ânice momentâ with Charalampis and questioned why he would remain at her property if he knew she wasnât consenting
- The womanâs housemate testified she remembered passing out in bed and waking up to someone raping her
- The womanâs mother testified her daughter told her she âthought it was strangeâ there were two people in the front of the car and assumed it was the Uber driver and his friend
- The womanâs mother said her daughter told her she âthought it was strangeâ there were two people in the front of the car and assumed it was the Uber driver and his friend
- The womanâs housemate testified she checked her Uber app days later and realised the driverâs profile did not match either of the men who picked her up
- Nurse Megan Caffrey testified the woman reported feeling âtotally out of itâ and said she had been âslapped awakeâ by one of the men the following morning
- Jimmy Parimeros, a police officer and friend of Michael Vrouvis, testified that Vrouvis initially refused repeated requests for sex due to her intoxication but agreed later in the morning after she asked again
- The womanâs testimony included her saying she âdidnât recallâ how long the sexual encounters lasted and that she was âin and out of consciousnessâ
- The defence argued the womanâs memory gaps and fragmented recall made her account unreliable, and she may have âregrettedâ the night and created a different narrative
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- Article 1 states the womanâs blood alcohol level was between 0.2 and 0.1, while Article 2 and 4 state it was between 0.1 and 0.15
- Article 1 says the womanâs mother and housemate testified about the incident, but Article 4 only mentions the motherâs testimony in detail
- Article 1 claims the womanâs housemate testified she remembered passing out in bed and waking up to someone raping her, but Article 4 attributes this to the housemateâs testimony
- Article 2 says Panormitis Charalampis testified he felt a âdutyâ to get the woman home safely and that she initiated the sexual activity, but Article 1 does not mention this specific testimony
- Article 1 states the defence argued the woman âdidnât rememberâ how long the sexual encounters lasted, while Article 2 does not explicitly mention this defence argument
Source Articles
Jury clears men accused of raping intoxicated woman waiting for an Uber
Two men accused of raping a young woman they picked up while she waited for an Uber have been acquitted on all charges by a Northern Territory jury....
Rape trial of men woman believed were Uber drivers ends first week
A jury has heard a woman told two men to "get out" during an alleged sexual assault in her Darwin apartment that lasted more than eight hours. The court was told the woman had been drinking on a night...
Trial of two men accused of rape in Darwin hears closing arguments
The jury in the trial of two men accused of picking up a young woman waiting for an Uber after a night out and raping her in her home has heard closing submissions....
Man accused of raping woman in her apartment testifies 'she wasn't that drunk'
Panormitis Charalampis, co-accused of picking up an intoxicated young woman from outside a nightclub while she was waiting for an uber and sexually assaulting her at her apartment, took the stand, und...