Tate brothers sue Australian YouTuber Nathan Pope and others for defamation in Florida court
Consensus Summary
The Tate brothers, Andrew and Tristan, have renewed their defamation lawsuit in Florida, this time naming Australian YouTuber Nathan Pope (known online as 'Gadget') alongside five other defendants. The lawsuit follows a previous dismissal in December 2025 due to lack of jurisdiction over anonymous critics. The brothers allege Pope and others intentionally posted false claims about them, including accusations of rape, human trafficking, and exploitation, causing financial and reputational harm. They also filed a separate lawsuit against X to unmask anonymous users. Pope and other defendants are crowdfunding legal fees, arguing the lawsuit is an attempt to silence critics and drain their resources. Both sources agree the Tate brothers face criminal charges in Romania and the UK, which they deny. The case hinges on whether Florida courts have jurisdiction over the defendants' online posts, with legal battles ongoing.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- Andrew and Tristan Tate filed an amended defamation complaint in Florida on April 11, 2026, naming Adelaide YouTuber Nathan Pope (known online as 'Gadget') as a defendant.
- The Tate brothers previously lost a motion to dismiss their defamation case in December 2025 due to lack of jurisdiction over anonymous defendants, many of whom were not Florida residents.
- Nathan Pope and other defendants are crowdfunding legal fees to fight the Tate brothers' defamation claims, which they describe as an attempt to financially drain them.
- The Tate brothers allege Pope and other defendants made false claims about them, including branding them as 'rapists, traffickers, groomers, paedophiles, scammers, and operators of a criminal enterprise,' causing reputational and financial harm.
- The Tate brothers filed a separate lawsuit against X (formerly Twitter) seeking to unmask anonymous 'Doe Defendants' to continue the defamation suit.
- X was granted an extension until May 11, 2026, to respond to the lawsuit seeking to unmask anonymous users.
- Nathan Pope stated he has 'not defamed anyone' and that being named in the lawsuit changes 'very little' as the legal battle continues.
- The Tate brothers claim they have lived in Romania since around 2015 and describe themselves as 'entrepreneurs, social-media figures, and businessmen' whose earning capacity depends on their reputations.
- The Tate brothers face charges of rape and human trafficking in Romania and the United Kingdom, which they deny.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- An anonymous defendant referred to as 'Jack Doe' (known as @CrayonMurders on social media) told ABC he was introduced to the Tate brothers after his son repeated a misogynistic statement at dinner, prompting him to investigate their influence on young men.
- Lawyer Christopher B. Hopkins filed paperwork for a 'protective order' to prevent the loss of anonymity for defendants, arguing the Tate brothers' case still 'lacks jurisdiction'.
- The Tate brothers allege the anonymous 'Doe Defendants' continue to accuse them of 'heinous crimes, including rape and human trafficking, as well as having sexually transmitted diseases'.
- Nathan Pope's YouTube channel focuses on criticism of the Tate brothers for allegedly 'recruiting young boys' and 'exploiting them into a cult environment'.
- Andrew Tate has described himself as a 'misogynist'.
- The Tate brothers argue the court has jurisdiction because 'substantial acts giving rise to the claims occurred in Florida, were directed to Florida, or were expressly aimed at the defamation action and related Florida proceedings'.
- The lawsuit claims the defendants 'caused reputational and other harm' by 'attempting to shape public opinion' surrounding the Tate brothers' ongoing court proceedings.
- The Tate brothers allege the commentary damaged their 'online educational and membership businesses,' portraying them as 'criminal, unlawful, or built on exploitation'.
- The brothers claim the commentary led to 'business loss, lost customers, lost subscribers, diminished platform access, impaired payment processing, and increased security concerns'.
- Nathan Pope told ABC he was 'bemused' by the amended claim, stating he has identified himself publicly on numerous occasions.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- ABC states the Tate brothers filed their amended complaint 'last week' (April 11, 2026), while NEWSCOMAU does not specify the exact date but refers to it as filed 'last week' without further clarification.
- ABC mentions the Tate brothers' lawsuit against X was granted an extension 'to May 11,' while NEWSCOMAU states X was granted an extension 'until May 11' without specifying the exact date of the grant.
Source Articles
Andrew and Tristan Tate's renewed defamation claim names Australian YouTuber
An Adelaide YouTuber has been identified in a renewed defamation lawsuit self-described misogynist Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan have lodged with a US court against some of their online critics.
Aussie YouTuber facing Tate claim
Controversial figure Andrew Tate has launched a fresh attack on his critics, now directly targeting an Australian commentator in a legal claim.