Australia investigates tech firms over under-16 social media ban compliance breaches
Consensus Summary
Australia is investigating major tech firms like Meta, TikTok, Snapchat, and YouTube for allegedly failing to comply with a new law banning under-16s from social media accounts. The eSafety Commission found that despite 4.7 million accounts being deactivated since December 2023, many children still have access due to weak age-verification systems, repeated verification attempts, and poor reporting mechanisms. Platforms like Facebook closed 550,000 accounts, while Snapchat and TikTok combined removed 665,000, yet surveys show 31% of parents still report their children under 16 have social media access. The government warns of fines up to A$49.5 million for systemic breaches, with Communications Minister Anika Wells accusing companies of ‘unacceptable’ practices. While all sources agree on the investigations and penalties, details vary on exact retention rates and platform-specific failures, with the Guardian providing the most granular parent survey data and NewsCorp emphasizing the ban’s origins in a media campaign.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- Australia’s social media minimum age laws (effective December 10, 2023) ban under-16s from holding accounts on platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, YouTube, and others
- The eSafety Commission is investigating Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube for potential non-compliance with the under-16 ban
- Over 4.7 million social media accounts were deactivated, removed, or restricted in the first days after the ban took effect (January 2024)
- Meta (Facebook/Instagram) reported closing 550,000 accounts under the ban, while Snapchat and TikTok combined closed 665,000 accounts
- A survey of 900 Australian parents found 31% of children still had social media accounts after the ban (down from 49% pre-ban)
- The laws carry a maximum penalty of A$49.5 million (US$33.9 million) for systemic breaches
- The eSafety Commission claims platforms allow repeated attempts at age verification until success, and some use ineffective facial recognition near the 16-year age cutoff
- Anika Wells (Australian Communications Minister) stated platforms are ‘not doing enough to enforce the ban’ and accused them of ‘unacceptable’ practices
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The compliance report found platforms were making it easy to circumvent age-assurance measures
- The eSafety report stated 70% of under-16s who had accounts on Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok before the ban maintained access
- Around 63.6% of parents reported their child still had a Facebook account, 69.1% Instagram, 69.4% Snapchat, and 69.3% TikTok post-ban
- 48.5% of parents reported their child still had a YouTube account after the ban
- The report highlighted that many children retained accounts because platforms had not yet asked them to verify age
- Meta stated age verification is challenging near the 16-year boundary, citing the government’s own trial findings on ‘natural error margins’
- The Guardian included additional political commentary on Iran conflict and Australian gas export tax discussions unrelated to the social media story
- The article explicitly states the crackdown is ‘looming’ for social media giants, using stronger language than other sources
- The piece mentions the ban was implemented after News Corp’s ‘Let Them Be Kids’ campaign, positioning it as a world-first
Where the reporting differs
Details that conflict, or appear in only some outlets:
- The Guardian reports 70% of under-16s maintained access on Instagram/Snapchat/TikTok post-ban, but SBS does not provide this specific percentage breakdown
- Meta’s statement in the Guardian claims age verification is difficult near 16, while SBS does not reference Meta’s specific challenges with age verification
- The Guardian notes 48.5% of parents reported children still had YouTube accounts post-ban, but SBS and NewsCorp do not mention YouTube retention rates
- NewsCorp’s article emphasizes the ‘world-first’ origin of the ban via News Corp’s campaign, while other sources do not highlight this framing
- The Guardian includes political commentary on Iran and gas taxes unrelated to the social media story, which is absent in SBS and NewsCorp
Source Articles
Australia investigating tech giants over teen social media ban breaches
A compliance report on the legislation found platforms were making it easy to find ways to circumvent age-assurance measures.
Meta, Tiktok and Google under investigation for allegedly disobeying Australia’s social media ban
Nearly 70% of under-16s with accounts on Instagram, Snapchat or TikTok had maintained access, survey finds The Australian government has accused big tech firms like Meta, TikTok and Google of disobeying the landmark ban on under-16s using social media, after the country’s online safety office warned many children had accounts. A survey of 900 Australian parents found around a third (31%) said their children still had one or more social media accounts after the ban, compared to 49% before the law
Australian politics live: social media giants accused of ‘potential non-compliance’ with under-16s social media ban
Meta, TikTok, Snapchat and YouTube being investigated as eSafety releases update on compliance with social media ban. Follow today’s news live Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast More than 10,000 Australians return from Middle East The number of Australians returning from the Middle East since the war broke out in Iran has ticked over 10,000. Australians should not delay their departure from the region given the continued uncertainty. Our message is simple: if you can se
Crackdown looms for social media giants
Social media platforms like Facebook and TikTok face millions in fines over revelations they are using “big tech playbook” tactics to undermine Australia’s under-16 social media ban.
More Technology stories
Meta trial over social media addiction in children begins in California
Prince Harry and others ordered to pay legal costs to Daily Mail publisher after losing privacy lawsuit
Mass bird deaths linked to H5 bird flu in Australia’s southern states
Natalie Harp’s rise as Trump’s loyal aide and recent media scrutiny over her role
Brethren church accused of paying far-right activists to disrupt 2025 federal election
NSW ICAC inquiry into Catholic Schools NSW CEO Dallas McInerney and Liberal Party corruption allegations
Latest cross-verified stories
Sydney Swans players linked to sexual assault allegations and club sanctions
Australia vs Bangladesh Test series in 2026, featuring historic upsets and batting struggles
Ukraine targets Wildberries warehouses and Russian infrastructure with drone strikes amid escalating war
Australia’s largest gun buyback scheme after Bondi terror attack
Legal battles over Trump's White House ballroom construction
Ebola outbreak in DRC surpasses historical deadliness with rapid spread and containment challenges
Browse all stories from April 2026 in the archive.