Australian government investigates social media platforms for under-16s age ban compliance violations
Consensus Summary
Australia’s government is investigating major social media platforms—including Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube—for potential violations of a new law banning users under 16 from creating accounts. The eSafety Commission is set to release a compliance update on Tuesday, revealing that platforms have allegedly allowed underage users to repeatedly attempt age verification tests, failed to prevent banned users from creating new accounts, and have weak systems for reporting underage users. The ban, which took effect in December 2023, covers 10 platforms and carries fines of up to A$49.5 million for systemic non-compliance. While over 4.7 million accounts were deactivated in the first two days, surveys indicate that many children still have access to social media, with around 31% of parents reporting their under-16 children retained accounts. The government has emphasized that platforms must comply with Australian laws if they want to operate in the country, with Communications Minister Anika Wells warning that the regulator will take strong action against companies that fail to meet their obligations. Platforms like Meta have acknowledged the challenges of age verification but have pledged cooperation, while critics argue the tech giants are undermining the law through loopholes and weak enforcement.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube are under investigation by Australia’s eSafety Commission for potential non-compliance with the under-16 social media ban (Guardian, ABC, NewsCorp, SBS).
- The eSafety Commission will release a compliance update on Tuesday, detailing alleged failures by platforms to prevent underage users from repeatedly attempting age assurance tests (Guardian, ABC, NewsCorp, SBS).
- Platforms are accused of allowing banned users to create new accounts after deactivation and having poor systems for reporting underage users (Guardian, ABC, NewsCorp).
- The Australian government’s social media minimum age ban came into effect on December 10, 2023 (Guardian, ABC, NewsCorp).
- Fines for systemic non-compliance with the ban can reach up to A$49.5 million (Guardian, ABC, NewsCorp, SBS).
- The 10 platforms covered by the ban include Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, Reddit, YouTube, Kick, and Twitch (ABC, Guardian, NewsCorp).
- Over 4.7 million accounts were deactivated in the first two days of the ban (ABC, Guardian).
- Meta (Facebook/Instagram) reported closing 550,000 accounts, while Snapchat and TikTok combined closed 665,000 accounts (NewsCorp).
- The eSafety Commissioner is tasked with policing compliance and has warned of 'teething issues' during implementation (ABC, Guardian).
- Anika Wells, Australia’s Communications Minister, stated platforms must obey Australian laws if they want to operate in the country (Guardian, ABC, NewsCorp, SBS).
- A survey of 900 parents found 31% of children still had social media accounts after the ban, down from 49% before (Guardian).
- The ban applies to platforms with infinite scroll, feedback features (likes), and time-limited elements (ABC).
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- A survey found 70% of under-16s who had accounts on Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok before the ban still maintained access (Guardian).
- The Guardian reported that 63.6% of parents said their child still had a Facebook account, 69.1% for Instagram, 69.4% for Snapchat, and 69.3% for TikTok after the ban (Guardian).
- The Guardian cited Anika Wells saying platforms are 'obfuscating' and 'trying to undermine' the government’s laws (Guardian).
- The Guardian noted that facial age estimation had higher error rates for users near the 16-year-old cutoff, with some platforms knowing children aged 14 or 15 would receive false results (Guardian).
- The Guardian reported that the government is promoting the ban at the United Nations but acknowledges anecdotal reports of continued underage access (Guardian).
- The Guardian included a quote from Meta stating age verification is challenging and that robust age verification should be required at the app store level (Guardian).
- The Guardian mentioned that the eSafety report stated the most common reason children retained accounts was that they had not yet been asked to verify their age (Guardian).
- The ABC reported that the eSafety Commissioner, Julie Inman-Grant, said there were 'teething issues' as platforms deployed new age-assurance technologies (ABC).
- The ABC stated that the definition of platforms covered by the ban was updated to include those with infinite scroll, feedback features, and time-limited elements (ABC).
- The ABC noted that the ban does not apply to Discord, Google Classroom, WhatsApp, or Roblox (ABC).
- The ABC reported that eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant said 'if there's egregious noncompliance, it will be pretty obvious pretty quickly' (ABC).
- The ABC mentioned that platforms are required to provide data on compliance to eSafety under the laws (ABC).
- NewsCorp reported that Meta (Facebook/Instagram) closed 550,000 accounts, while Snapchat and TikTok combined closed 665,000 accounts (NewsCorp).
- NewsCorp stated that the ban was implemented after News Corp’s 'Let Them Be Kids' campaign (NewsCorp).
- NewsCorp included a direct quote from Anika Wells saying the tactics used by platforms are 'right out of the big tech playbook' (NewsCorp).
- SBS reported that platforms were making it easy to find ways to circumvent age-assurance measures (SBS).
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The Guardian reports that 70% of under-16s retained accounts on Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok, while the ABC states that eSafety found 'meaningful attempts' to remove underage users in the first two days of the ban.
- The Guardian claims platforms are allowing children to repeatedly attempt age verification until they pass, but Meta’s statement in the Guardian suggests age verification is inherently challenging for the industry.
- The ABC states the ban does not apply to WhatsApp, while the Guardian does not mention WhatsApp’s inclusion or exclusion in the ban.
- The Guardian reports that TikTok and Google did not respond to requests for comment, while NewsCorp does not mention this.
- The ABC mentions that the ban applies to 10 platforms, while the Guardian and NewsCorp list 10 platforms but do not explicitly state the total count in their headlines.
Source Articles
Crackdown looms for social media giants
Social media platforms like Facebook and TikTok face millions in fines over revelations they are using “big tech playbook” tactics to undermine Australia’s under-16 social media ban....
Australia investigating tech giants over teen social media ban breaches
A compliance report on the legislation found platforms were making it easy to find ways to circumvent age-assurance measures....
Australian politics live: social media giants accused of ‘potential non-compliance’ with under-16s social media ban
Meta, TikTok, Snapchat and YouTube being investigated as eSafety releases update on compliance with social media ban. Follow today’s news live Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podc...
Five social media companies investigated over response to teen ban
Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube are being investigated for potential noncompliance with the ban, almost four months after the laws came into force....
Meta, Tiktok and Google under investigation for allegedly disobeying Australia’s social media ban
Nearly 70% of under-16s with accounts on Instagram, Snapchat or TikTok had maintained access, survey finds The Australian government has accused big tech firms like Meta, TikTok and Google of disobeyi...