← Back to Stories

Australia investigates tech giants over compliance with under-16 social media ban

Yesterday5 articles from 4 sources

Consensus Summary

Australia is investigating five major social media platforms—Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube—for potential noncompliance with a world-first ban on under-16 accounts. The eSafety Commissioner’s upcoming report reveals alleged failures, including allowing repeated age-verification attempts until users pass, failing to block banned users from creating new accounts, and inadequate systems for reporting underage users. Over 4.7 million accounts were deactivated in the first two days after the ban took effect in December 2023, though surveys suggest many children still retain access, with 31% of parents reporting their under-16 children had accounts post-ban. The government, led by Communications Minister Anika Wells, has warned platforms of severe penalties—up to A$49.5 million—for systemic noncompliance and has accused tech companies of undermining the law. While platforms like Meta, Snapchat, and TikTok have reported closing hundreds of thousands of accounts, critics argue enforcement remains inconsistent, particularly near the 16-year-old age threshold where facial recognition errors are more likely. The investigation follows Australia’s push to become a global leader in online child protection, though anecdotal evidence and parent surveys raise doubts about the ban’s immediate effectiveness.

✓ Verified by 2+ sources

Key details reported by multiple sources:

  • Five platforms—Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube—are under investigation for potential noncompliance with Australia’s under-16 social media ban (ABC, NEWSCOMAU, GUARDIAN).
  • The eSafety Commissioner will release a compliance update on Tuesday detailing alleged failures by platforms, including allowing repeated age-assurance attempts until users pass (ABC, NEWSCOMAU, GUARDIAN).
  • Platforms are accused of failing to prevent banned users from creating new accounts after deactivation (ABC, NEWSCOMAU, GUARDIAN).
  • The maximum fine for systemic noncompliance is A$49.5 million per platform (ABC, NEWSCOMAU, GUARDIAN).
  • Over 4.7 million accounts were deactivated or restricted in the first two days after the ban took effect on December 10, 2023 (ABC, NEWSCOMAU).
  • Meta (Facebook/Instagram) reported closing 550,000 accounts, while Snapchat and TikTok combined closed 665,000 accounts (NEWSCOMAU).
  • The ban covers 10 platforms: Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, X, Reddit, YouTube, Kick, and Twitch (ABC, NEWSCOMAU, GUARDIAN).
  • A parent survey of 900 households found 31% of children still had social media accounts after the ban, down from 49% pre-ban (GUARDIAN).
  • 70% of under-16s who had accounts on Instagram, Snapchat, or TikTok pre-ban retained access post-ban (GUARDIAN).
  • Communications Minister Anika Wells stated platforms must obey Australian laws if they operate in the country (ABC, NEWSCOMAU, GUARDIAN).
  • The eSafety Commissioner is tasked with policing compliance and may impose penalties for systemic failures (ABC, NEWSCOMAU, GUARDIAN)

Points of Difference

Details reported by only one source:

SBS News
  • A compliance report found platforms were making it easy to circumvent age-assurance measures (no other source mentions this phrasing)
ABC News
  • The ban was introduced on December 10, 2023, and eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant called the initial compliance issues 'teething problems' (not mentioned elsewhere).
  • The definition of covered platforms was updated in January 2024 to include those with infinite scroll, feedback features, and time-limited elements (not explicitly detailed in other sources).
  • The eSafety Commissioner’s preliminary analysis found platforms made 'meaningful attempts' to remove underage users (not emphasized in other sources).
  • The government revealed 4.7 million accounts were deactivated in the first two days, with no disaggregated breakdown by platform (other sources mention Meta/Snapchat/TikTok numbers but not the total).
NEWSCOMA
  • The ban was introduced after News Corp’s 'Let Them Be Kids' campaign (not mentioned in other sources).
  • The government claims 4.7 million accounts were closed since the ban, with Meta reporting 550,000 closures and Snapchat/TikTok combined reporting 665,000 (ABC mentions totals but not Meta’s specific number).
The Guardian
  • A survey found 63.6% of children still had Facebook accounts, 69.1% Instagram, 69.4% Snapchat, and 69.3% TikTok post-ban (ABC and NEWSCOMAU do not provide these platform-specific percentages).
  • The eSafety report stated the most common reason for retained accounts was platforms not yet asking users to verify age (not highlighted in other sources).
  • Meta cited 'natural error margins' in age verification, referencing the government’s own Age Assurance Technology Trial (not mentioned elsewhere).
  • The Guardian includes a quote from Anika Wells calling tech tactics 'straight out of the big tech playbook' (ABC and NEWSCOMAU use similar but less specific phrasing).
  • The Albanese government promoted the ban at the United Nations in New York (not mentioned in other sources).

Contradictions

Conflicting information between sources:

  • The Guardian reports 70% of under-16s retained access to Instagram/Snapchat/TikTok post-ban, while ABC and NEWSCOMAU only state 'a substantial proportion' without specifying percentages.
  • NEWSCOMAU claims the ban was introduced after News Corp’s campaign, but ABC and GUARDIAN do not mention this as the primary driver.
  • The Guardian states the eSafety report found platforms did not have easy pathways to report underage users, while ABC and NEWSCOMAU focus on repeated age-assurance attempts as the primary issue without emphasizing reporting gaps.
  • ABC mentions the ban’s 'teething issues' as a temporary phase, while the Guardian frames some platform behaviors as 'unacceptable' and systemic failures.
  • The Guardian includes Meta’s statement about 'natural error margins' in age verification, which is not referenced in ABC or NEWSCOMAU’s reporting.

Source Articles

GUARDIAN

Australian politics live: social media giants accused of ‘potential non-compliance’ with under-16s social media ban

Meta, TikTok, Snapchat and YouTube being investigated as eSafety releases update on compliance with social media ban. Follow today’s news live Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podc...

NEWSCOMAU

Crackdown looms for social media giants

Social media platforms like Facebook and TikTok face millions in fines over revelations they are using “big tech playbook” tactics to undermine Australia’s under-16 social media ban....

SBS

Australia investigating tech giants over teen social media ban breaches

A compliance report on the legislation found platforms were making it easy to find ways to circumvent age-assurance measures....

GUARDIAN

Meta, Tiktok and Google under investigation for allegedly disobeying Australia’s social media ban

Nearly 70% of under-16s with accounts on Instagram, Snapchat or TikTok had maintained access, survey finds The Australian government has accused big tech firms like Meta, TikTok and Google of disobeyi...

ABC

Five social media companies investigated over response to teen ban

Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, TikTok and YouTube are being investigated for potential noncompliance with the ban, almost four months after the laws came into force....