Australian TGA proposes sunscreen regulation reforms after SPF testing controversies
Consensus Summary
Australian regulators are overhauling sunscreen rules after consumer tests revealed widespread discrepancies between advertised and actual SPF levels. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) proposed reforms following CHOICEās 2023 findings that 16 out of 20 popular SPF50+ products failed to meet their claims, with some testing as low as SPF4. Ultra Violetteās āLean Screen 50+ā and Colesā āSPF 50+ Ultra Tubeā were among the worst-performing, while Banana Boatās baby sunscreen tested at SPF28 instead of SPF50+. The TGA cited unreliable lab testing and manufacturer ignorance of legal obligations, prompting recalls of over 20 products. Reforms include stricter lab oversight, faster adoption of new testing tech, and simplified SPF labels using categories like ālowā or āvery highā instead of numbers. Professor Tony Lawler defended the TGAās response, noting recalls occurred during reform drafting, while CHOICE praised the proposals but criticized the shift away from numerical SPF ratings. The TGA also plans to mandate public disclosure of SPF testing data, though this could expose trade secrets. With Australia facing the worldās highest skin cancer rates, the changes aim to restore consumer trust amid ongoing investigations into underperforming products.
ā Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) proposed sweeping reforms to Australian sunscreen regulations in response to SPF testing inconsistencies, with public consultation open for feedback.
- CHOICE tested 20 popular SPF50 and SPF50+ sunscreens in June 2023 and found 16 failed to meet their advertised SPF claims, with results ranging from SPF4 to SPF43 instead of the labelled SPF50+.
- Ultra Violetteās Australian Sunscreen āLean Screen 50+ā tested at SPF4, while Coles SPF 50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube tested at SPF43, according to CHOICEās accredited lab testing.
- Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ tested at SPF28, significantly below its labelled claim, per CHOICEās findings.
- Australia has the highest rates of skin cancer and melanoma globally, with around 2000 people dying annually from these conditions, according to the TGA.
- The TGA identified unreliable SPF testing data from certain laboratories and noted some manufacturers lacked understanding of their legal obligations regarding SPF claims.
- Over 20 sunscreen products have been recalled or paused from sale since CHOICEās testing was published, as reported by both NEWSCOMAU and ABC.
- The TGAās proposed reforms include adopting new SPF testing technologies faster, strengthening oversight of testing laboratories, and improving quality assurance through regular testing and ingredients standards.
- The TGAās draft proposals aim to simplify SPF labelling by replacing numerical values with categories like low, medium, high, or very high protection.
- Professor Tony Lawler, head of the TGA, defended the regulatorās handling of the sunscreen scandal, stating the TGA had not ābeen sitting on our handsā and had taken actions like mandatory and voluntary recalls during the reform process.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The TGA revealed in a report that SPF testing data from certain laboratories appeared unreliable and some product owners and manufacturers lacked an understanding about their legal obligations, with a quote: āCurrent understanding of SPF values, combined with the variability of test results, highlights the need for clearer SPF labelling to ensure that consumers can make informed decisions about their sun protection, and provide sponsors greater certainty of regulatory compliance.ā
- Ultra Violette shared an Instagram post boasting about the high cost of testing their sunscreens ($150K) and emphasizing their commitment to integrity, stating: āWe take the integrity of our products pretty damn serious ā no cutting corners here.ā
- The TGA spokesman stated: āGiven Australia has the highest rates of skin cancer and melanoma in the world with around 2000 people dying each year, it is critical that the regulatory settings are appropriate to ensure consumer confidence in sunscreens.ā
- The TGA found current exemption rules for some cosmetic sunscreens have been described as complex, and the regulator wants to adopt new testing technologies faster and improve quality assurance through regular testing and ingredients standards.
- Professor Tony Lawler said the TGAās proposed changes would amount to a complete overhaul of the regulations in Australia and that the regulator had been cracking down on sunscreens while drafting the proposals, including mandatory and voluntary recalls.
- The TGAās consultation document outlines seven different areas for regulatory reform and gives multiple options for proposed changes for each area, including maintaining the current standards.
- Professor Lawler stated: āThe very public consultation that we're undertaking is around rebuilding that public trust, not only in sunscreens but also the function of the regulator.ā
- CHOICE Director Andy Kelly said: āSince we did our test over 20 products have either been recalled or paused from sale, which is a really good result.ā
- The TGA acknowledged changing labelling requirements would need legislative amendments and industry investment and would create divergence with other countries that use SPF numerical ratings.
- The TGA said publicly available SPF testing data could expose trade secrets relating to formulation details, potentially allowing competitors to reverse-engineer formulations or benchmark products unfairly.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- NEWSCOMAU states Ultra Violetteās Instagram post claimed testing their sunscreens cost up to $150K, while ABC does not mention this specific detail or quote from Ultra Violetteās social media.
- NEWSCOMAU highlights the TGAās report explicitly stating āsome product owners and manufacturers lacked an understanding about their legal obligations,ā but ABC does not reference this specific finding in its coverage.
- NEWSCOMAU describes the TGAās proposed changes as addressing āconcerns about the quality, safety and effectiveness of specific sunscreen formulations and ingredients,ā while ABC focuses more on the regulatory and testing process overhaul without emphasizing ingredient safety.
- ABC reports Professor Lawler saying the TGA had been ācracking down on sunscreensā with recalls during the reform process, but NEWSCOMAU does not explicitly state this timeline of concurrent enforcement actions.
- NEWSCOMAU mentions the TGAās proposal to āsimplify labels to low, medium, high or very high protectionā as part of addressing āmisleading claims,ā while ABC emphasizes the TGAās justification for this change as correcting āmisconceptionsā about the SPF scaleās non-linearity.
Source Articles
Regulatorās crackdown on dud sunscreen claims
Australiaās medicines regulator has revealed new regulations for sunscreen after it was revealed some of the most iconic Aussie brands may not meet their labelled SPF claims...
TGA not 'sitting on our hands', defends handling of sunscreen scandal
In his first interview since the sunscreen controversy erupted almost 10 months ago, the Therapeutic Goods Administration head says he hopes the proposed shake-up of regulations will restore consumer ...
TGA releases proposed reforms to Australian sunscreen regulation
The proposals include a number of changes to SPF testing requirements, oversight of the labs that do SPF testing, and the way SPF is labelled ā reforms that would overhaul the sunscreen industry....