Australian TGA proposes sunscreen regulation reforms after SPF testing controversies
Consensus Summary
Australian regulators are overhauling sunscreen rules after consumer tests revealed widespread discrepancies between advertised and actual SPF levels. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) proposed reforms following CHOICEās 2023 findings that 16 out of 20 popular SPF50+ products failed to meet claims, with some testing as low as SPF4. Ultra Violetteās āLean Screen 50+ā and Colesā āSPF 50+ Ultra Tubeā were among the worst performers, while the TGA also flagged unreliable lab testing and manufacturer confusion about compliance. Over 20 products have since been recalled or paused. The TGAās plans include stricter lab oversight, faster adoption of new testing tech, and simplified SPF labels using categories like ālowā or āvery highā instead of numbers. Professor Tony Lawler defended the regulatorās actions, noting recalls occurred during reform drafting, while CHOICE welcomed transparency improvements but opposed the new labelling system. The TGAās proposals aim to restore confidence amid Australiaās high skin cancer rates, with public consultation open to gather input before finalizing changes.
ā Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) proposed sweeping reforms to Australian sunscreen regulations in response to SPF testing inconsistencies, with public consultation open for feedback.
- CHOICE tested 20 popular SPF50 and SPF50+ sunscreens in June 2023 and found 16 failed to meet their advertised SPF claims, with results ranging from SPF4 to SPF43 instead of the labelled SPF50+.
- Ultra Violetteās Australian Sunscreen āLean Screen 50+ā tested at SPF4, while Coles SPF 50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube tested at SPF43, according to CHOICEās accredited lab testing.
- The TGA identified unreliable SPF testing data from certain laboratories and noted manufacturersā lack of understanding about legal obligations regarding SPF claims.
- Australia has the highest rates of skin cancer and melanoma globally, with around 2000 people dying annually from these conditions, according to the TGA.
- Over 20 sunscreen products have been recalled or paused from sale since CHOICEās testing was published, as confirmed by the TGA and CHOICE.
- The TGAās proposed reforms include adopting new SPF testing technologies faster, strengthening oversight of testing laboratories, and improving quality assurance through regular testing and ingredients standards.
- The TGAās draft proposals include options to simplify SPF labelling to categories like low, medium, high, or very high protection, replacing numerical SPF values.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The TGA revealed in a report that current exemption rules for cosmetic sunscreens have been described as complex and require overhaul.
- Ultra Violette shared an Instagram post boasting about the high cost of testing their sunscreens ($150K) and emphasizing their commitment to integrity, stating āno cutting corners here.ā
- A TGA spokesman explicitly stated the proposals were intended to strengthen confidence in sunscreen performance, linking it directly to Australiaās high skin cancer mortality rates.
- Professor Tony Lawler, head of the TGA, defended the regulatorās handling of the sunscreen scandal, stating the TGA had not ābeen sitting on our handsā and had taken actions like mandatory and voluntary recalls while drafting reforms.
- The TGAās consultation document outlines seven specific areas for regulatory reform, including options to maintain current standards alongside proposed changes.
- CHOICEās Director of Campaigns, Andy Kelly, expressed concern about replacing SPF numerical ratings with word-based categories, stating Australian consumers are accustomed to the number system and would need time to adapt.
- The TGA acknowledged potential drawbacks to making SPF testing data public, including the risk of competitors reverse-engineering formulations or unfair benchmarking.
- The TGAās proposed reforms were described as a ācomplete overhaulā of sunscreen regulation in Australia, with Lawler emphasizing the need to rebuild public trust in both sunscreens and the regulator.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- NEWSCOMAU states the TGA found āsome product owners and manufacturers lacked an understanding about their legal obligations,ā while ABCās Lawler implies the TGA had been actively enforcing compliance through recalls during the reform drafting process.
- NEWSCOMAU highlights Ultra Violetteās Instagram post as an example of a brand boasting about rigorous testing, but ABC does not reference this specific social media post or brand example in its coverage.
- ABCās Lawler suggests the TGAās investigations into underperforming sunscreens identified by CHOICE and ABC are ongoing, but NEWSCOMAU does not mention ongoing investigations beyond the TGAās response to CHOICEās report.
- NEWSCOMAU explicitly states the TGAās proposals are intended to āstrengthen confidence in sunscreen performance,ā while ABC frames the reforms as primarily aimed at ārebuilding public trust in the regulatorā alongside sunscreens.
- ABCās Kelly criticizes the TGAās proposed word-based SPF labels as a āconcernā due to consumer adaptation, but NEWSCOMAU does not include CHOICEās specific opposition to the new labelling system.
Source Articles
TGA not 'sitting on our hands', defends handling of sunscreen scandal
In his first interview since the sunscreen controversy erupted almost 10 months ago, the Therapeutic Goods Administration head says he hopes the proposed shake-up of regulations will restore consumer ...
Regulatorās crackdown on dud sunscreen claims
Australiaās medicines regulator has revealed new regulations for sunscreen after it was revealed some of the most iconic Aussie brands may not meet their labelled SPF claims...
TGA releases proposed reforms to Australian sunscreen regulation
The proposals include a number of changes to SPF testing requirements, oversight of the labs that do SPF testing, and the way SPF is labelled ā reforms that would overhaul the sunscreen industry....