TGA proposes sunscreen regulation reforms amid SPF testing controversies
Consensus Summary
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is proposing major reforms to Australia’s sunscreen regulations after widespread concerns about SPF testing inaccuracies. In June 2023, CHOICE testing revealed 16 out of 20 popular sunscreens failed to meet their advertised SPF claims, with some products testing significantly lower than labeled—such as Ultra Violette’s SPF50+ sunscreen, which registered as SPF4. Since then, over 20 sunscreens have been recalled or paused, and the TGA has launched investigations into underperforming products. The proposed changes include stricter SPF testing methods, greater oversight of testing laboratories, and potential simplification of SPF labeling by replacing numbers with categories like 'low,' 'medium,' 'high,' and 'very high.' The TGA cites Australia’s high rates of skin cancer and melanoma—with around 2,000 deaths annually—as justification for ensuring consumer confidence in sunscreen efficacy. While consumer group CHOICE supports the reforms, it opposes the removal of SPF numbers, arguing consumers are accustomed to them. The TGA has opened a public consultation period to gather feedback on the proposals, which aim to address transparency issues, such as the lack of public access to SPF testing data, and improve regulatory compliance among manufacturers.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The TGA proposed sweeping reforms to Australian sunscreen regulations in response to SPF testing failures, including changes to testing methods, lab oversight, and labeling.
- CHOICE testing in June 2023 found 16 out of 20 widely used sunscreens did not meet their SPF label claims, with some testing significantly lower (e.g., Ultra Violette’s SPF50+ tested at SPF4).
- Since CHOICE’s testing, over 20 sunscreen products have been recalled or paused from sale due to SPF discrepancies, according to Professor Tony Lawler (TGA).
- Australia has the highest rates of skin cancer and melanoma globally, with around 2,000 deaths annually, per statements from the TGA.
- The TGA’s draft proposals include options to replace SPF numbers with 'low,' 'medium,' 'high,' and 'very high' ratings, though this remains open for public consultation.
- The TGA has conducted investigations into sunscreens identified by CHOICE and ABC as potentially underperforming, with ongoing scrutiny of individual products.
- Current SPF testing data is not publicly available to the TGA, limiting transparency around the evidence behind SPF claims.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Professor Tony Lawler (TGA head) defended the regulator’s handling of the scandal, stating the TGA had not 'been sitting on our hands' and emphasized a 'risk-based approach' to recalls.
- The TGA released seven specific areas for regulatory reform in its consultation paper, with multiple options for each, including maintaining current standards.
- CHOICE’s Andy Kelly criticized the proposed replacement of SPF numbers with word ratings, stating consumers are accustomed to numerical SPF and would need time to adapt.
- The TGA acknowledged that changing SPF labeling would require legislative amendments and industry investment, creating divergence with international SPF numerical systems.
- Professor Lawler mentioned that the TGA’s investigations into underperforming sunscreens would continue, but declined to comment on imminent recalls or regulatory action for specific products.
- The TGA report highlighted that some product owners and manufacturers lacked understanding of their legal obligations regarding SPF claims.
- Ultra Violette’s Instagram post claimed its SPF50+ sunscreen cost $150,000 to test, emphasizing its commitment to integrity, which the TGA is reviewing.
- The TGA found current exemption rules for cosmetic sunscreens are complex and proposed adopting new testing technologies faster.
- The TGA spokesman stated the proposals aim to 'strengthen confidence in sunscreen performance' and address 'misconceptions' about SPF values.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- Article 1 (ABC) states the TGA has conducted mandatory and voluntary recalls of sunscreens while drafting reforms, but Article 3 (NEWSCOMAU) does not mention this specific detail.
- Article 1 (ABC) reports the TGA’s consultation paper outlines seven areas for reform with multiple options, while Article 2 (ABC) does not specify the number of areas or options in detail.
- Article 3 (NEWSCOMAU) claims the TGA found 'some product owners and manufacturers lacked an understanding about their legal obligations,' which is not explicitly mentioned in ABC articles.
- Article 1 (ABC) includes a direct quote from Professor Lawler about the TGA’s 'risk-based approach' to recalls, while Article 2 (ABC) does not quote him on this point.
- Article 3 (NEWSCOMAU) highlights Ultra Violette’s Instagram post about testing costs, which is not referenced in ABC articles.
Source Articles
TGA releases proposed reforms to Australian sunscreen regulation
The proposals include a number of changes to SPF testing requirements, oversight of the labs that do SPF testing, and the way SPF is labelled — reforms that would overhaul the sunscreen industry....
Regulator’s crackdown on dud sunscreen claims
Australia’s medicines regulator has revealed new regulations for sunscreen after it was revealed some of the most iconic Aussie brands may not meet their labelled SPF claims...
TGA not 'sitting on our hands', defends handling of sunscreen scandal
In his first interview since the sunscreen controversy erupted almost 10 months ago, the Therapeutic Goods Administration head says he hopes the proposed shake-up of regulations will restore consumer ...