Australian TGA proposes sunscreen regulation reforms amid SPF testing controversies
Consensus Summary
The Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is proposing major reforms to sunscreen regulations following widespread concerns about inaccurate SPF claims. Consumer group CHOICEās testing in June 2023 revealed that 16 out of 20 popular SPF50+ sunscreens failed to meet their advertised protection levels, with some testing as low as SPF4. The TGAās proposed changes include stricter SPF testing requirements, stronger oversight of testing laboratories, and potential simplification of SPF labels, with options like replacing numerical ratings with word-based categories such as low, medium, high, and very high. The reforms aim to restore consumer confidence in sunscreen products, particularly in Australia where skin cancer and melanoma rates are the highest globally, causing around 2,000 deaths annually. Since CHOICEās findings, over 20 sunscreen products have been recalled or paused from sale. The TGA has defended its actions, stating it has taken regulatory steps while drafting the reforms, including mandatory and voluntary recalls. However, some stakeholders, including CHOICE, have expressed concerns about the proposed word-based SPF rating system, arguing that consumers are accustomed to numerical ratings and may struggle to adapt. The TGA is now seeking public feedback on the proposed changes through a consultation process.
ā Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) proposed sweeping reforms to Australian sunscreen regulations in response to concerns about SPF protection claims.
- Consumer group CHOICE tested 20 popular SPF50 and SPF50+ sunscreens in June 2023 and found 16 did not meet their advertised SPF claims, with results ranging from SPF4 to SPF43 instead of SPF50+.
- Australia has the highest rates of skin cancer and melanoma globally, with around 2,000 deaths annually from these causes.
- The TGA opened a public consultation process on the proposed reforms, which include changes to SPF testing requirements, oversight of testing labs, and potential simplification of SPF labelling.
- Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion SPF 50+ tested at SPF28 and Coles SPF 50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube tested at SPF43 according to CHOICE testing.
- Ultra Violetteās Australian Sunscreen ālean screen 50+ā tested at SPF4, despite marketing claims of high protection.
- The TGA has paused or recalled over 20 sunscreen products since CHOICEās testing was published, including the Ultra Violette product.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The TGA flagged removing SPF numbers and replacing them with 'low', 'medium', 'high', and 'very high' ratings as one of the reform options.
- The TGA acknowledged that changing SPF labelling would require legislative amendments and industry investment, creating divergence with other countries using numerical SPF ratings.
- The TGA proposed requiring sunscreen manufacturers to publicly disclose their SPF testing data, though this could expose trade secrets.
- TGA Head Professor Tony Lawler defended the regulatorās handling of the scandal, stating they had taken action on individual products while drafting reforms, including mandatory and voluntary recalls.
- CHOICE Director Andy Kelly criticized the TGAās proposed word-based SPF rating system, stating Australian consumers are accustomed to numerical ratings and would need time to adapt.
- The TGA revealed in a report that SPF testing data from certain laboratories appeared unreliable and some manufacturers lacked understanding of their legal obligations.
- Ultra Violette shared an Instagram post claiming their sunscreen testing costs up to $150,000, emphasizing their commitment to integrity and high protection standards.
- The TGA stated current exemption rules for cosmetic sunscreens are complex and proposed adopting new testing technologies faster to strengthen quality assurance.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- Article 1 (ABC) states the TGA proposed replacing SPF numbers with word-based ratings, while Article 3 (ABC) does not explicitly state this as a definitive proposal but mentions it as an option among others.
- Article 2 (NEWSCOMAU) mentions Ultra Violetteās Instagram post about testing costs, but Article 1 and Article 3 do not reference this specific social media detail.
Source Articles
TGA releases proposed reforms to Australian sunscreen regulation
The proposals include a number of changes to SPF testing requirements, oversight of the labs that do SPF testing, and the way SPF is labelled ā reforms that would overhaul the sunscreen industry....
TGA not 'sitting on our hands', defends handling of sunscreen scandal
In his first interview since the sunscreen controversy erupted almost 10 months ago, the Therapeutic Goods Administration head says he hopes the proposed shake-up of regulations will restore consumer ...
Regulatorās crackdown on dud sunscreen claims
Australiaās medicines regulator has revealed new regulations for sunscreen after it was revealed some of the most iconic Aussie brands may not meet their labelled SPF claims...