TGA proposes sunscreen regulation reforms after SPF testing controversies in Australia
Consensus Summary
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) is proposing major reforms to Australia’s sunscreen regulations after widespread concerns about inaccurate SPF claims, with consumer group CHOICE revealing in June 2023 that 16 out of 20 popular SPF50+ products failed to meet their advertised protection levels. The TGA’s draft proposals aim to overhaul SPF testing methods, strengthen oversight of testing laboratories, and simplify labelling—potentially replacing numerical SPF ratings with word-based categories like ‘low’ or ‘very high’ to address consumer confusion. Over 20 sunscreens have already been recalled or paused since CHOICE’s findings, and the TGA has defended its regulatory actions while continuing investigations into underperforming products. While CHOICE supports the reforms, it opposes the proposed graphic-based SPF ratings, arguing consumers are accustomed to numerical scales. The TGA’s consultation process seeks public feedback on these changes, which could also require legislative updates and industry investment, creating potential divergence from international standards.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has proposed sweeping reforms to Australian sunscreen regulations following concerns about SPF protection claims.
- CHOICE tested 20 popular SPF50 and SPF50+ sunscreens in June 2023 and found 16 did not meet their advertised SPF claims, with results ranging from SPF4 to SPF43 instead of SPF50+.
- Australia has the highest rates of skin cancer and melanoma globally, with around 2,000 deaths annually from these causes.
- The TGA has opened a public consultation process on proposed reforms, which include changes to SPF testing requirements, oversight of testing labs, and potential simplification of SPF labelling.
- Seven sunscreens tested by CHOICE returned SPF results significantly lower than their SPF50+ claims, including Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion (tested at SPF28) and Coles SPF50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube (tested at SPF43).
- The TGA has proposed requiring public disclosure of SPF testing data to improve transparency, though this may expose trade secrets.
- Over 20 sunscreen products have been recalled or paused from sale since CHOICE’s testing was published in June 2023.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The TGA suggested replacing SPF numbers with 'low', 'medium', 'high', and 'very high' ratings to address consumer misconceptions about the SPF scale's non-linearity.
- Professor Tony Lawler defended the TGA’s handling of the scandal, stating they had taken regulatory action (recalls, alerts) while drafting reforms and would continue investigating individual products.
- CHOICE Director Andy Kelly criticized the TGA’s proposed graphic-based SPF rating system, stating Australian consumers are accustomed to numerical ratings and would need time to adapt.
- The TGA acknowledged that legislative amendments and industry investment would be required to implement the new SPF labelling system, creating divergence with international standards.
- The TGA cited media reports by ABC and CHOICE’s testing as key triggers for the proposed reforms.
- Ultra Violette’s Australian Sunscreen ‘Lean Screen 50+’ returned an SPF4 result in CHOICE’s testing, despite the company’s Instagram post boasting about high testing costs ($150K) and emphasizing product integrity.
- The TGA revealed that some manufacturers lacked understanding of their legal obligations regarding SPF claims and that SPF testing data from certain labs appeared unreliable.
- The regulator highlighted that current exemption rules for cosmetic sunscreens are complex and proposed adopting new testing technologies faster to address quality and safety concerns.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- Article 1 (ABC) states the TGA proposed removing SPF numbers and replacing them with word-based ratings, while Article 3 (ABC) does not explicitly contradict this but focuses more on the TGA’s defense and consultation process without additional detail on the labelling proposal’s specifics.
- Article 2 (NEWSCOMAU) mentions Ultra Violette’s Instagram post about $150K testing costs, but neither ABC article references this specific company or post, despite covering the same scandal.
- Article 1 (ABC) notes the TGA’s proposal to require public disclosure of SPF testing data could expose trade secrets, while Article 2 (NEWSCOMAU) does not mention this potential drawback.
- Article 3 (ABC) includes a direct quote from Professor Tony Lawler defending the TGA’s actions, stating they had not ‘been sitting on our hands,’ but this defensive tone is not echoed in the same way in Articles 1 or 2.
- Article 2 (NEWSCOMAU) states the TGA found ‘current exemption rules for some cosmetic sunscreens have been described as complex,’ a detail not mentioned in the other ABC articles.
Source Articles
TGA releases proposed reforms to Australian sunscreen regulation
The proposals include a number of changes to SPF testing requirements, oversight of the labs that do SPF testing, and the way SPF is labelled — reforms that would overhaul the sunscreen industry....
Regulator’s crackdown on dud sunscreen claims
Australia’s medicines regulator has revealed new regulations for sunscreen after it was revealed some of the most iconic Aussie brands may not meet their labelled SPF claims...
TGA not 'sitting on our hands', defends handling of sunscreen scandal
In his first interview since the sunscreen controversy erupted almost 10 months ago, the Therapeutic Goods Administration head says he hopes the proposed shake-up of regulations will restore consumer ...