TGA proposes sunscreen regulation reforms after SPF testing controversies in Australia
Consensus Summary
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has proposed major reforms to Australia’s sunscreen regulations following widespread concerns about inaccurate SPF claims. Consumer group CHOICE revealed in June 2023 that 16 out of 20 popular SPF50+ sunscreens failed to meet their advertised protection levels, prompting recalls and regulatory scrutiny. The TGA’s draft proposals aim to improve SPF testing reliability, strengthen oversight of testing labs, and simplify labelling—including a controversial option to replace numerical SPF ratings with word-based categories like 'low' or 'high.' While CHOICE supports stricter testing and transparency, it opposes the word-based rating system, citing consumer familiarity with SPF numbers. The TGA has defended its actions, noting recalls of over 20 products since CHOICE’s findings and emphasizing the need to rebuild public trust in sunscreen efficacy, given Australia’s high skin cancer rates. The reforms are part of a broader effort to address inconsistencies in SPF testing and ensure consumers can rely on product claims, though industry stakeholders and consumer advocates remain divided over the proposed changes.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) proposed sweeping reforms to Australian sunscreen regulations, including changes to SPF testing requirements, lab oversight, and SPF labelling.
- Consumer group CHOICE tested 20 popular SPF50 and SPF50+ sunscreens in June 2023 and found 16 did not meet their advertised SPF claims.
- Australia has the highest rates of skin cancer and melanoma globally, with around 2,000 deaths annually from these causes.
- The TGA opened a public consultation process on the proposed reforms, which include requiring public disclosure of SPF testing data.
- Seven sunscreens tested by CHOICE returned SPF results significantly lower than their SPF50+ claims, including Banana Boat Baby Zinc (tested at SPF28) and Coles SPF50+ (tested at SPF43).
- The TGA has paused or recalled over 20 sunscreen products since CHOICE’s testing was published.
- Professor Tony Lawler, TGA head, defended the regulator’s handling of the sunscreen scandal, stating the TGA had not been 'sitting on our hands' and had taken recalls while drafting reforms.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The TGA proposed replacing SPF numbers with 'low', 'medium', 'high', and 'very high' ratings to simplify consumer understanding, citing misconceptions about the SPF scale.
- The TGA acknowledged that changing SPF labelling would require legislative amendments and industry investment, creating divergence with international SPF numerical standards.
- CHOICE Director Andy Kelly stated the group opposes replacing SPF numbers with word-based ratings, calling it a 'concern' for consumer familiarity.
- The TGA noted that publicly disclosing SPF testing data could expose trade secrets, potentially allowing competitors to reverse-engineer formulations.
- The TGA cited media reports by ABC and CHOICE’s testing as key triggers for the proposed reforms.
- The TGA found that some product owners and manufacturers lacked understanding of their legal obligations regarding SPF claims.
- Ultra Violette’s Australian Sunscreen ‘Lean Screen 50+’ tested at SPF4, despite being marketed as SPF50+, and the company posted on Instagram about the high cost of SPF testing ($150K).
- The TGA stated current exemption rules for cosmetic sunscreens are complex and proposed adopting new testing technologies faster.
- The TGA’s report highlighted variability in SPF test results from certain laboratories, raising concerns about reliability.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- ABC notes the TGA proposed replacing SPF numbers with word-based ratings, while CHOICE Director Andy Kelly explicitly opposes this change, calling it a concern for consumer familiarity.
- Newscomaau reports Ultra Violette’s Instagram post boasting about the $150K cost of SPF testing, but ABC does not mention this specific example or company in its articles.
- Newscomaau states the TGA found 'some product owners and manufacturers lacked understanding of their legal obligations,' but ABC does not reference this specific finding.
Source Articles
TGA not 'sitting on our hands', defends handling of sunscreen scandal
In his first interview since the sunscreen controversy erupted almost 10 months ago, the Therapeutic Goods Administration head says he hopes the proposed shake-up of regulations will restore consumer ...
Regulator’s crackdown on dud sunscreen claims
Australia’s medicines regulator has revealed new regulations for sunscreen after it was revealed some of the most iconic Aussie brands may not meet their labelled SPF claims...
TGA releases proposed reforms to Australian sunscreen regulation
The proposals include a number of changes to SPF testing requirements, oversight of the labs that do SPF testing, and the way SPF is labelled — reforms that would overhaul the sunscreen industry....