TGA proposes reforms to Australian sunscreen regulations amid SPF testing controversies
Consensus Summary
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has proposed major reforms to Australia’s sunscreen regulations following widespread concerns about inaccurate SPF claims, with consumer group CHOICE revealing that 16 out of 20 popular SPF50+ products failed to meet advertised protection levels in 2023. Over a dozen sunscreens have been recalled or paused, including brands like Banana Boat, Coles, and Ultra Violette, whose products tested significantly lower than claimed. The TGA’s draft proposals aim to overhaul SPF testing standards, strengthen oversight of testing laboratories, and improve transparency by requiring public disclosure of testing data. One controversial option involves replacing numerical SPF ratings with simplified categories like low, medium, high, and very high to address consumer confusion, though this has drawn criticism from groups like CHOICE for disrupting familiar labeling. The reforms also address gaps in regulatory enforcement, such as manufacturers’ lack of awareness of legal obligations and inconsistencies in lab testing reliability. With Australia facing the highest skin cancer rates globally—resulting in around 2,000 deaths annually—the TGA’s moves are designed to restore public trust in sunscreen efficacy, though industry stakeholders and consumer advocates remain divided over the proposed changes.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) proposed sweeping reforms to Australian sunscreen regulations in response to concerns about SPF protection claims, including changes to testing requirements, lab oversight, and SPF labelling.
- Consumer group CHOICE tested 20 popular SPF50 and SPF50+ sunscreens in June 2023 and found 16 did not meet their advertised SPF claims, with results ranging from SPF4 to SPF43 instead of SPF50+.
- More than a dozen sunscreens have been pulled from shelves or paused from supply in Australia due to SPF concerns, including Banana Boat Baby Zinc Sunscreen Lotion (tested at SPF28 instead of SPF50+), Coles SPF50+ Sunscreen Ultra Tube (tested at SPF43), and Ultra Violette’s Australian Sunscreen (tested at SPF4 instead of SPF50+).
- Australia has the highest rates of skin cancer and melanoma globally, with around 2,000 deaths annually, prompting the TGA to emphasize the importance of reliable sunscreen regulation.
- The TGA’s proposed reforms include requiring public disclosure of SPF testing data to improve transparency, though it acknowledges potential risks to trade secrets.
- The TGA has opened a public consultation process on the proposed reforms, which include options like replacing SPF numbers with low/medium/high/very high ratings to simplify consumer understanding.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The TGA flagged removing SPF numbers and replacing them with low, medium, high, and very high ratings as one of the proposed reforms, citing misconceptions about the SPF scale's non-linearity.
- The TGA noted that currently, sunscreen makers are not required to provide their SPF testing data to the regulator, limiting transparency around the evidence behind SPF ratings.
- CHOICE Director Andy Kelly stated the group is against replacing SPF numbers with word/graphics-based ratings, calling it a change consumers would need to adapt to.
- The TGA acknowledged that legislative amendments and industry investment would be required to implement changes like the new SPF rating system, and it would create divergence with other countries using numerical SPF ratings.
- The TGA found that some product owners and manufacturers lacked understanding of their legal obligations regarding sunscreen claims, and current exemption rules for cosmetic sunscreens are described as complex.
- Ultra Violette’s Instagram post claimed its sunscreen testing costs up to $150,000, stating the company takes product integrity seriously and ensures best protection for consumers.
- The TGA’s report highlighted variability in SPF test results from certain laboratories, raising concerns about their reliability.
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- Article 1 (ABC) states the TGA proposed replacing SPF numbers with low/medium/high/very high ratings, while Article 2 (ABC) does not explicitly mention this proposal as a definitive change but frames it as an option among multiple proposals.
- Article 1 (ABC) mentions the TGA’s concern about 'misconceptions' about the SPF scale, but Article 3 (NEWSCOMAU) does not reference this specific concern or the proposed word-based rating system.
Source Articles
TGA not 'sitting on our hands', defends handling of sunscreen scandal
In his first interview since the sunscreen controversy erupted almost 10 months ago, the Therapeutic Goods Administration head says he hopes the proposed shake-up of regulations will restore consumer ...
Regulator’s crackdown on dud sunscreen claims
Australia’s medicines regulator has revealed new regulations for sunscreen after it was revealed some of the most iconic Aussie brands may not meet their labelled SPF claims...
TGA releases proposed reforms to Australian sunscreen regulation
The proposals include a number of changes to SPF testing requirements, oversight of the labs that do SPF testing, and the way SPF is labelled — reforms that would overhaul the sunscreen industry....