NSW judge overturns antisemitism label in anti-Israel graffiti case, finds miscarriage of justice
Consensus Summary
The NSW Supreme Court ruled in August 2026 that Mohommed Farhat’s anti-Israel graffiti in Sydney’s east was not antisemitic but a political act, overturning earlier convictions that labeled his actions as hate crimes. Farhat, then 22, pleaded guilty in late 2024 to 15 offences, including spray-painting 'Fuk Israel' and setting a vehicle alight, after being recruited by an unknown person for money and drugs. The magistrate initially sentenced him to 20 months in jail, with a non-parole period of 10 months, and revoked his parole, citing a terror risk. However, Justice Desmond Fagan found the state misapplied the IHRA definition of antisemitism, calling it 'detached from reality,' and dismissed the state’s request for a one-year extended supervision order with 55 conditions. Both sources agree Farhat was not ideologically motivated but a 'vandal for hire,' and the court criticized police and prosecutors for failing to disclose evidence that could have reduced his sentence. The ruling highlights broader concerns about conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism, especially after the December 2024 Bondi beach terror attack that killed 15 people.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- Mohommed Farhat pleaded guilty to 15 offences related to property damage, including spray-painting 'Fuk Israel' on cars in Sydney’s east and setting a vehicle alight in late 2024
- Farhat was sentenced to 20 months in jail with a non-parole period of 10 months in November 2024
- Farhat was remanded in custody in November 2024
- The NSW Supreme Court ruled that Farhat’s actions were not antisemitic but 'a curse against a foreign state'
- The state applied for a one-year extended supervision order (ESO) under the Terrorism Act, which would have imposed 55 strict conditions on Farhat’s release
- Farhat was 22 years old at the time of the events
- The graffiti included 'Fuk Israel' and 'PKK coming' in Sydney’s eastern suburbs
- The NSW Supreme Court dismissed the state’s application for an extended supervision order in August 2026
- The magistrate initially determined the property offences were antisemitic and handed Farhat an aggravated sentence
- The IHRA definition of antisemitism was criticized as 'detached from reality' and 'inept' by Justice Desmond Fagan
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Farhat was due to be released on parole from early December 2025, but the parole order was revoked after a successful application by the commissioner of corrective services and the crown
- The magistrate set the non-parole period with a note that Farhat would be 'better served with an extended period of supervision on parole, particularly around drug and alcohol and mental health interventions'
- The December 2024 Bondi beach terror attack that killed 15 people was referenced in the context of the IHRA definition
- A June 2026 poll from the Pew Research Center found 79% of Australian respondents viewed Israel unfavourably
- Farhat unsuccessfully appealed the severity of his sentence in the district court in January 2026
- Farhat had a Hezbollah tattoo on his neck and attended a protest against Israel’s attacks on Lebanon
- Farhat exchanged text messages with family members about attacks in southern Lebanon
- Farhat was recruited by an unknown person and paid money and promised drugs for the graffiti
- The incident was part of a spate of graffiti and arson attacks in Sydney’s eastern suburbs that summer, later determined to be orchestrated by organised crime figures
- Farhat’s solicitor, Abdul Reslan, mentioned 'unease with respect to the approach of authorities throughout this matter'
- The Labor MP Stephen Lawrence protested Israel’s killing in Gaza by marching across the Sydney Harbour Bridge in August 2025
- Farhat was previously handed a sentence of one year and eight months with an expiry date in October 2026
- The State Parole Authority revoked Farhat’s statutory parole due to a finding he posed a serious, identifiable risk to the safety of the community
- Farhat claimed his life 'was taken over by drugs' and he did not understand the impact of his actions
- The Local Court judge previously said material before that court cast some doubt on the true motivation but made a finding that hatred of or prejudice against Jewish people was an aggravating factor
- The judge noted expert opinion before the court stated the definition of antisemitism was debated, with the IHRA formulation criticized as 'verbose and imprecise'
- The Jewish Council of Australia (JCA) also criticized the IHRA wording in a submission to the Royal Commission on Antisemitism and Social Cohesion
Contradictions
Conflicting information between sources:
- The Guardian states Farhat was sentenced to '20 months in jail with a non-parole period of 10 months,' while ABC states he was sentenced to 'one year and eight months with an expiry date in October 2026'
- The Guardian mentions Farhat was due to be released on parole from early December 2025, but ABC does not mention this specific release date
- The Guardian states Farhat pleaded guilty to 15 offences in connection with property damage, while ABC does not explicitly mention the number 15 offences but confirms vandalism offences
- The Guardian notes Farhat was recruited and paid $4,000 and promised drugs, while ABC states he was paid $4,000 but does not mention the promise of drugs explicitly
Source Articles
NSW judge says anti-Israel graffiti case went ‘haywire’ when vandalism was labelled antisemitic
Mohommed Farhat spray-painted slogans and torched a car in Woollahra. He pleaded guilty but supreme court judge says case appears to be a ‘miscarriage of justice’ Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast For almost two years, Mohommed Farhat has been in prison after he pleaded guilty to 15 offences in connection with property damage, including spray-painting “Fuk Israel” on cars in Sydney’s east and setting another vehicle alight in late 2024. This week, the New South Wales s
Graffiti 'wrongly' labelled antisemitic in Sydney spree, judge finds
A man who admitted to a string of vandalism offences in Sydney's east did not act as an "antisemitic bigot" but was a "vandal for hire", and is not at risk of committing a serious terrorism offence, according to the state's highest court.