← Back to Stories

Israel’s new law imposing death penalty on Palestinians convicted of lethal attacks in the West Bank

7 hours ago3 articles from 2 sources

Consensus Summary

Israel’s parliament has passed a law making the death penalty by hanging the default punishment for Palestinians in the West Bank convicted of lethal attacks deemed terrorism. The legislation, backed by far-right minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, removes judicial discretion, allowing military courts to impose death sentences with a simple majority vote. It does not apply retroactively, sparing those freed in recent ceasefire deals, and distinguishes between Israeli and military courts, applying only to Palestinians in the occupied territories. The law has been widely condemned by international rights groups, the UN, and European nations as discriminatory and a violation of international law, with critics warning it institutionalizes systemic violence against Palestinians. Two sources agree on key details such as the law’s retroactive exclusion, Ben-Gvir’s role, and the 90-day execution timeline, but differ on the extent of appeal restrictions and societal reception. While ABC highlights opposition from rights groups and legal challenges, the Guardian frames the law as part of a broader dehumanization campaign, emphasizing its normalization within Israeli society.

✓ Verified by 2+ sources

Key details reported by multiple sources:

  • Israel’s parliament passed legislation making the death penalty by hanging the default punishment for Palestinians in the West Bank convicted of intentionally carrying out deadly attacks deemed terrorism by military courts (Guardian, ABC).
  • The law applies only to future cases and is not retroactive, sparing Palestinians freed in recent ceasefire deals (ABC, Guardian).
  • Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel’s national security minister, is a key backer of the bill and wore a noose-shaped lapel pin symbolizing executions (Guardian, ABC).
  • The law removes judicial discretion, allowing military courts to impose death sentences with a simple majority decision without requiring prosecutor requests or clemency (Guardian, ABC).
  • The UN, EU, and rights groups (Amnesty International) condemned the law as discriminatory, violating international law and the right to life (Guardian, ABC).
  • Israel’s last execution was in 1962 for Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann (Guardian, ABC).
  • The law will be enforced within 90 days of sentencing (Guardian) and executions will be carried out by hanging (Guardian).
  • The Association of Civil Rights in Israel petitioned Israel’s supreme court to challenge the law, calling it discriminatory (ABC).
  • The bill was initiated by the far-right Otzma Yehudit party led by Ben-Gvir (Guardian) and supported by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (ABC).
  • The legislation applies only to Palestinians in the West Bank, not Israeli citizens, and distinguishes between Israeli and military courts (ABC).
  • Over 10,000 Palestinians are currently detained in Israel, many without trial, with over 80 deaths in custody since October 2023 (Guardian).

Points of Difference

Details reported by only one source:

The Guardian
  • The law closes off avenues for appeal or clemency for Palestinians under occupation, while prisoners tried inside Israel could see sentences commuted to life imprisonment (Guardian).
  • The EU’s diplomatic service condemned the proposal, stating capital punishment breaches the right to life and risks violating the absolute prohibition on torture (Guardian).
  • The law institutionalizes the execution of Palestinians as part of a broader system of dehumanization and systemic violence against Palestinians (Guardian).
  • The law emerged under a political leadership that openly embraces violence and dehumanization, with ministers glorifying killing in media rhetoric (Guardian).
  • The law is described as a new phase in Israel’s oppression of Palestinians, embedding lethal control within its legal framework (Guardian).
  • The law is compared to Israel’s prison system, which has been described as a network of torture camps for Palestinians (Guardian).
  • The law is framed as part of a long-term process of dehumanization of Palestinians, as documented by B’Tselem’s 2025 report (Guardian).
  • The law is criticized for its potential to harm hostage negotiations, as Israel previously exchanged hostages for Palestinian prisoners (Guardian).
  • The Shin Bet security agency previously objected to the death penalty, believing it could spur revenge plots by Palestinian militants (Guardian).
ABC News
  • The law was opposed by both Israeli and Palestinian rights groups, who called it racist and draconian (ABC).
  • The law was described as a major win for far-right Netanyahu government minister Itamar Ben-Gvir (ABC).
  • The law was celebrated in the Israeli parliament with cheers, and Ben-Gvir brandished a bottle in celebration (ABC).
  • The law was described as a sign of strength and national pride by Ben-Gvir, who said, 'From today, every terrorist will know, and the whole world will know, that whoever takes a life, the State of Israel will take their life' (ABC).
  • The law was described as a hierarchy between Israeli court systems, confining the death penalty to Palestinians convicted of murdering Jewish citizens (ABC).
  • The law was criticized by Amichai Cohen, a senior fellow at the Israel Democracy Institute, for applying only to military courts in the West Bank and not Israeli courts (ABC).
  • The law was described as potentially breaching international law, as Israel’s parliament should not be legislating in the West Bank, which is not sovereign Israeli territory (ABC).
  • The law was described as a separate bill from one under consideration dealing with punishment for the October 7, 2023, attackers (ABC).
  • The law was described as not applying retroactively to militants held for the October 7, 2023, attack (ABC).

Contradictions

Conflicting information between sources:

  • The Guardian states the law will allow executions within 90 days of sentencing, while ABC does not specify a timeframe for executions beyond the 30-day implementation period for the law itself.
  • The Guardian mentions that the law removes all avenues for appeal or clemency for Palestinians under occupation, but ABC only states that the law does not allow clemency, without specifying the full extent of appeal restrictions.
  • The Guardian describes the law as applying to Palestinians in the West Bank and Israel, with sentences commuted to life imprisonment for those tried inside Israel, while ABC specifies the law applies only to Palestinians in the West Bank and not Israeli citizens.
  • The Guardian states that the law is part of a broader system of dehumanization and systemic violence against Palestinians, while ABC focuses more on the legal and political implications without framing it in those terms.
  • The Guardian highlights that the law is being celebrated in Israeli society with little opposition, while ABC notes that the law was opposed by Israeli and Palestinian rights groups, implying more resistance than the Guardian suggests.

Source Articles

GUARDIAN

Israel’s death penalty law marks a new phase in its dehumanisation of Palestinians | Yuli Novak

A government that openly embraces violence against Palestinians has now enshrined into law a policy of lethal force Yuli Novak is the executive director of B’Tselem, an Israeli human rights group This...

GUARDIAN

Israel passes law to give death penalty to Palestinians convicted of lethal attacks

Knesset approves measure that has been criticised by European nations and rights groups Israel’s parliament has passed a law imposing the death penalty on Palestinians convicted of fatal attacks, a me...

ABC

Israel passes death penalty for Palestinians convicted of lethal attacks

The law, long-sought by Israel's far-right politicians, makes death by hanging the default punishment for West Bank Palestinians convicted of killing Israelis....