Australia’s proposed digital duty of care laws targeting online harm and tech giants
Consensus Summary
Australia’s government is pushing for new digital duty of care laws requiring tech giants to reduce online harm, with fines of more than $100 million for non-compliance. The bill, discussed since December when AI tool Grok enabled 'nudify' features for children, includes opt-out mechanisms for algorithmic feeds and targets six serious harms like child exploitation and self-harm. Communications Minister Anika Wells is open to revising the draft to gain Coalition support, though opposition leader Angus Taylor has raised free speech concerns. The Greens back the bill but demand stricter penalties tied to platforms’ global revenue. Meanwhile, a separate bill to strengthen social media restrictions for under-16s, which began December 10 last year, faces delays, with Wells urging its passage by the end of this week. AI leaders have also called for slower development of AI tools, aligning with the government’s push for oversight.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- Proposed laws would allow fines of more than $100 million for tech platforms failing to reduce foreseeable harm
- The bill includes measures to address six serious harms (ABC mentions child sexual exploitation, grooming, threats, self-harm, harassment, and criminal offences; Guardian references six serious harms without specifics)
- The legislation would require platforms to allow users to opt out of algorithmic feeds (e.g., TikTok, Instagram, Facebook)
- The bill was discussed in December when AI tool Grok allowed users to 'nudify' photos, including of children and teens
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- Communications Minister Anika Wells is open to changing draft laws to gain Coalition support, including allowing parliament to decide serious harm thresholds
- Opposition Leader Angus Taylor stated on Thursday the Coalition would not support the bill in its current form, citing concerns over political censorship
- Ms Wells mentioned the bill would have addressed the Grok AI 'nudify' issue in December
- The Greens support the bill but argue for penalties tied to a platform’s global revenue percentage
- AI leaders Dario Amodei, Sam Altman, and Elon Musk called for oversight of AI development over the last few months
- Ms Wells referenced the bill’s intent to address 'urgency around new and emerging serious harms'
- The bill includes an opt-in/opt-out system for algorithmic feeds, requiring push notifications to users
- Prime Minister Anthony Albanese stated the bill is not about government control but about penalties of more than $100m for breaches
- The legislation aims to protect adults from illegal content and children from six serious harms outlined in the bill
- The draft Digital Duty of Care was expected to be unveiled on Tuesday
- The bill was first recommended in 2024 by a review of Australia’s Online Safety Act under former Communications Minister Michelle Rowland
- Public consultation on the bill occurred in May
- The draft would apply to services like app stores, telcos, and tech giants producing personal devices (e.g., Apple, Samsung, Microsoft)
- Deputy Liberal leader Jane Hume expressed suspicion over ministerial powers to 'control the internet' on Monday
- Greens Communications spokeswoman Sarah Hanson-Young argued for a genuine opt-in function for algorithms, calling anything less a failure
- Ms Wells urged the Senate to pass a separate bill to strengthen social media restrictions on under-16s, which started on December 10 last year
- The proposed changes to the under-16s bill were delayed for more than eight weeks, giving tech giants time to shred documents
- Ms Wells stated the best time to pass the bill was two months ago, but the second best time is this week, urging passage by the end of this week
- Prime Minister Albanese described the duty of care bill as 'landmark reform' to create a safer online environment for all Australians
- The bill aims to address harmful algorithms, giving users control over content consumption
Where the reporting differs
Details that conflict, or appear in only some outlets:
- ABC states the Coalition would not support the bill in its current form due to political censorship concerns, while THEWEST reports Deputy Liberal leader Jane Hume expressed 'natural suspicion' but did not explicitly reject the bill
- ABC mentions six serious harms (with specifics) while GUARDIAN references 'six serious harms' without detailing them
- THEWEST states the draft was unveiled on Tuesday, but no other source confirms this exact date
- THEWEST claims the Greens argue for a 'genuine opt-in' function for algorithms, while ABC does not mention this specific demand
Source Articles
Wells willing to change digital harm proposal to win Coalition support
Communications Minister Anika Wells responds to criticism about proposed new ministerial powers to designate what constitutes serious online harm, saying she is open to changing the bill.
Australia's digital duty of care bill a ‘global reckoning for big tech’, minister says – video
The Australian prime minister, Anthony Albanese, said the digital duty of care bill was not about government control, and added tech giants could face penalties of more than $100m for breaches. The communications minister, Anika Wells, said the legislation requiring users to be able to opt out of algorithmic feeds would also force social media platforms to protect adults from illegal content and children from six serious harms that are outlined under the bill ‘Global reckoning for big tech’: Aus
Labor’s digital duty of care laws target social media, AI, tech giants and harmful online content
Labor is facing a fight over its proposed online laws as Coalition warns of government control of the internet.
More Politics stories
One Nation leader Warren Pickering admits past drug use and scandals ahead of Victorian election
Norway's King Harald V funeral and national mourning
Reform UK foreign donations scandal and police investigation
Republican midterm convention in Dallas focuses on Trump amid low approval ratings
King Charles clarifies Harry and Meghan’s non-working royal status post-UK return
Australia proposes opt-out social media algorithms and digital duty of care laws
Latest cross-verified stories
Céline Dion's sold-out Paris comeback concerts after stiff person syndrome diagnosis
Australian tourist dies after falling from Kelingking Beach cliff near Bali
Andrew Hastie vs Pauline Hanson over 'traitor' cartoon and Ben Roberts-Smith case
Elena Rybakina wins US Open 2026, dethroning Aryna Sabalenka as world No.1
AI researchers warn of existential risks, call for slowdown or regulation
Philippines ferry fire leaves dozens dead and missing near Coron
Browse all stories from September 2026 in the archive.