← Back to Stories

High Court hears appeal of White Australia neo-Nazi group ban

By The Media Fact Checker teamUpdated Just now3 articles from 2 independent sources

Consensus Summary

The High Court is hearing an appeal from the neo-Nazi group White Australia, which was banned in May under new hate speech laws introduced in January following last year's Bondi Beach terror attack. The group, also known as the National Socialist Network, argues the laws breach the implied freedom of political communication, the separation of powers, and exceed the federal government's authority. They cite the 1950s Communist Party ban precedent and claim the laws lack judicial oversight, guardrails, and fairness. The group's leader, Thomas Sewell, is a convicted criminal and was attempting to form a political party when banned. The High Court hearings began on September 8 and will continue into Wednesday, with judgment expected in several weeks or months. The group's legal team argues the laws are overly broad and could be abused by authoritarian governments, while the government defends the laws as necessary to protect national security and prevent harmful conduct.

✓ Verified by 2+ sources

Key details reported by multiple sources:

  • The High Court is hearing White Australia's case on September 8 and 9
  • White Australia was outlawed in May under new hate speech laws
  • The group was attempting to form a political party when banned
  • The laws were introduced in January after last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • White Australia's leader is Thomas Sewell (also called Tom Sewell)
  • The group cites the 1950s Communist Party ban precedent in its arguments
  • The group argues the laws breach the implied freedom of political communication
  • The group argues the laws breach the separation of powers
  • The group argues the laws lack guardrails or judicial review
  • The group's legal team includes barristers Peter King and Shahed Sharify
  • The group has 12 members

Points of Difference

Details reported by only one source:

ABC News
  • The group was banned as the second under these laws after last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal arguments include the federal government lacking power to make the law
  • The group's legal arguments include breach of separation of powers between government and judiciary
  • The group's legal team described the ban as a 'sledgehammer on a nut'
  • The group's members are described as 'awful but lawful' by their barrister
  • The group's leader, Thomas Sewell, is a convicted criminal
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were rushed through in January without scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws could be abused by authoritarian governments
  • The group's legal team argued the laws lack written submissions, hearings, or sliding scale of punishment
  • The group's legal team argued the laws lack retrospective time limits or ability to subpoena the minister
  • The group's legal team argued the laws lack carve-outs for fair comment
  • The group's legal team argued the laws lack reviews or hearings
  • The group's legal team argued the laws offer no ability to appeal the decision
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of the Bondi Beach attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws could be used to ban any political party where members threatened hate crimes
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were determined by a politician without judicial fairness
  • The group's legal team argued the laws could be used to ban any political party where members engaged in hate crimes
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were determined by a 'busy minister who flicks through a brief and decides in two hours'
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in the wake of last year's Bondi Beach terror attack
  • The group's legal team argued the laws were introduced in January without sufficient scrutiny
The Guardian
  • The group's leader, Tom Sewell, was sentenced in June to a community corrections order for behaving in an offensive manner in public
  • The group's leader, Tom Sewell, was found to have emulated 'Nazi thugs of 1930s Berlin' when using racial slurs outside a Chinese consulate
  • The group's leader, Tom Sewell, is a 33-year-old
  • The group's legal team argued the law breaches the implied freedom of political communication and is 'authoritarian in nature'
  • The group's legal team argued the law could be used to ban any political party where members threatened or engaged in hate crimes
  • The group's legal team argued the law's decision is based on the opinion of a politician without judicial fairness
  • The group's legal team argued the law's decision is made by a 'busy minister who flicks through a brief and decides in two hours'
  • The group's legal team argued the law's decision is made by a politician based on ASIO's recommendation
  • The group's legal team argued the law's decision is made by the home affairs minister, Tony Burke
  • The group's legal team argued the law's decision is made by the home affairs minister, Tony Burke, based on ASIO's recommendation
  • The group's legal team argued the law's decision is made by the home affairs minister, Tony Burke, based on ASIO's recommendation to the governor-general
  • The group's legal team argued the law's decision is made by the home affairs minister, Tony Burke, based on ASIO's recommendation to the governor-general under part 5.3B of the criminal code
  • The group's legal team argued the law's decision is made by the home affairs minister, Tony Burke, based on ASIO's recommendation to the governor-general under part 5.3B of the criminal code, which allows the federal police minister to recommend listing a group as a prohibited hate group
  • The group's legal team argued the law's decision is made by the home affairs minister, Tony Burke, based on ASIO's recommendation to the governor-general under part 5.3B of the criminal code, which allows the federal police minister to recommend listing a group as a prohibited hate group, with a maximum penalty of 15 years in prison for supporting, funding, training, recruiting, or joining the group

Where the reporting differs

Details that conflict, or appear in only some outlets:

  • The ABC states the group was banned in May, but the Guardian states the group was designated as an illegal hate group in May after ASIO's recommendation to the home affairs minister
  • The ABC states the group's leader is Thomas Sewell, while the Guardian states the group's leader is Tom Sewell
  • The ABC states the group's legal team argued the laws were rushed through in January without scrutiny, while the Guardian does not mention this specific claim
  • The ABC states the group's legal team argued the laws lack retrospective time limits or ability to subpoena the minister, while the Guardian does not mention these specific claims
  • The ABC states the group's legal team argued the laws lack carve-outs for fair comment, while the Guardian does not mention this specific claim

Source Articles

ABC

The High Court may be about to let Neo-Nazis form a racist political party

Several legal experts believe there is a significant prospect that Neo-Nazi group White Australia may have its ban overturned by the High Court.

Yesterday
ABC

Packed courtroom for Neo-Nazi group's appeal against ban

White Australia, which is currently prohibited under new hate speech laws, is appealing the ban in Australia's High Court.

1 hours ago
GUARDIAN

Ban on neo-Nazi White Australia party is ‘authoritarian’ and breaches constitution, high court hears

Lawyers also argue commonwealth does not have the power to ban a political party, as the high court ruled in 1951 over attempt to ban the Communist party Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast Lawyers for an outlawed neo-Nazi political party have argued anti-hate laws passed after the Bondi terror attack rely on the opinion of a politician and are “authoritarian in nature”. The White Australia party, formerly known as t

3 hours ago

More Crime stories

Police manhunt for Peter O'Ryan after axe attack on family in Gippsland

5 articles• 3 independent sources• 2 hours ago

Queensland farmer Darryl Young convicted of triple murder and attempted murder over cattle dispute

8 articles• 2 independent sources• 2 hours ago

Trial of three men accused of killing Australian surfers and American friend in Mexico

5 articles• 3 independent sources• 6 hours ago

Manhunt after alleged axe attack in Tyers, Victoria, leaves three injured

3 articles• 3 independent sources• 6 September 2026

Sentencing hearing for Molly Ticehurst's murderer Daniel Billings in NSW Supreme Court

8 articles• 2 independent sources• 4 September 2026

Death of former Queensland Police Commissioner Steve Gollschewski at 67 after cancer battle

3 articles• 3 independent sources• 4 September 2026

Latest cross-verified stories

Australia proposes social media algorithm opt-out laws with fines and regulatory oversight

Politics• 5 articles• Just now

Catastrophic Nepal-Tibet floods leave hundreds dead, thousands missing, including Australians

World• 111 articles• Just now

One Nation's early superannuation access policy and political reactions

Technology• 5 articles• 6 hours ago

Amazon cargo plane crash at Miami International Airport on Sunday, September 6, 2026

World• 6 articles• 6 hours ago

Bathla Group's collapse and its impact on homebuyers, workers, and construction projects

Business• 24 articles• 6 hours ago

Fox News ousts Maria Bartiromo amid controversy over election claims and policy breach

Business• 4 articles• 8 hours ago

Browse all stories from September 2026 in the archive.