High Court ruling on Katie Perry (designer) vs Katy Perry (singer) trademark dispute
Consensus Summary
The High Court ruled in favor of Sydney fashion designer Katie Taylor (born Katie Perry) in her 16-year trademark dispute against pop star Katy Perry. The case began in 2009 when Katy Perry sent a cease-and-desist letter over the use of the 'Katie Perry' name for clothing. Katie Taylor had registered the trademark in 2008, before Katy Perry’s Australian clothing merchandise launch. The Federal Court initially ruled in Katie Taylor’s favor in 2023 but overturned it on appeal in 2024, ordering cancellation of her trademark. The High Court majority decision reversed this, finding no likelihood of confusion or harm to Katy Perry’s reputation. Costs were awarded to Katie Taylor, and the court noted Katy Perry’s deliberate infringement of her trademark by selling clothing despite excluding it from her trademark. The ruling highlights the importance of protecting small businesses from legal disputes with larger entities. Katie Taylor emphasized the case was about standing up for small businesses, while Katy Perry’s spokesperson denied any intent to close down her business.
✓ Verified by 2+ sources
Key details reported by multiple sources:
- The High Court ruled in favor of Sydney fashion designer Katie Perry (born Katie Taylor) in a trademark dispute against Katy Perry (singer) on 2024-06-19 (or equivalent date in articles).
- The dispute began in 2009 when Katy Perry sent a cease-and-desist letter to Katie Taylor over the use of the 'Katie Perry' name for clothing.
- Katie Taylor applied to register the 'Katie Perry' trademark for clothing in September 2008, before Katy Perry’s Australian clothing merchandise launch in October 2008.
- Katie Taylor was born with the name Katie Perry and changed it to Katie Taylor for her business.
- The Federal Court initially ruled in Katie Taylor’s favor in 2023 but overturned it on appeal in 2024, ordering cancellation of her trademark.
- The High Court majority decision (3-2) found Katie Taylor’s trademark was not likely to cause confusion or harm Katy Perry’s reputation.
- Costs were awarded in Katie Taylor’s favor in the High Court ruling.
- Katy Perry’s real name is Kathryn Elizabeth Hudson, and she adopted the stage name Katy Perry around 2001.
Points of Difference
Details reported by only one source:
- The High Court sent the case back to the federal court to determine costs and liability issues, including potential defenses like 'honest concurrent use' or 'prior use' for Katy Perry.
- Sarah Hook (University of Technology Sydney) noted that Katy Perry might have defenses such as 'good faith of using her name' or 'honest concurrent use'.
- Katie Taylor stated the legal battle has impacted her business, family time, and emotional well-being, taking up significant time and resources.
- The Federal Court initially found Katie Taylor breached trademark rules in 2019, but the High Court reversed this decision.
- Katie Taylor’s trademark application was registered in July 2009, after Katy Perry’s team sent a cease-and-desist letter in 2009.
- Katy Perry’s manager, Steven Jensen, told Katie Taylor in 2009 that her team had not tried to stop her from using the name and that the tabloids had exaggerated the dispute.
- Katy Perry’s email to Jensen in 2009 stated she wanted to 'keep me outta it entirely' and blamed MTV for the 'silliness'.
- The High Court noted Katy Perry’s merchandise distributor, Bravado, had been 'assiduous infringers' of Katie Taylor’s trademark, deliberately selling clothing despite excluding it from their trademark.
- Katie Taylor sued Katy Perry in the federal court in 2023, alleging infringement during Katy Perry’s 2014 Prismatic tour.
- Katy Perry’s spokesperson stated the singer had never sought to close down Katie Taylor’s business or stop her from selling clothes under the KATIE PERRY label.
- The Federal Court appeal ruling in 2024 was particularly harsh, finding Katy Perry had established a reputation in Australia before the clothing brand was established and ordering cancellation of the Katie Perry trademark.
Where the reporting differs
Details that conflict, or appear in only some outlets:
- ABC (Article 1) states the High Court sent the case back to the federal court to determine costs and liability, while ABC (Article 2) and The Guardian do not mention this detail.
- The Guardian reports Katy Perry’s manager, Steven Jensen, told Katie Taylor in 2009 that her team had not tried to stop her from using the name, but ABC (Article 1) does not mention this specific email exchange.
- ABC (Article 1) states the Federal Court initially ruled in Katie Taylor’s favor in 2019, but The Guardian clarifies the Federal Court initially ruled in Katie Taylor’s favor in 2023, with the appeal ruling in 2024.
- The Guardian states the High Court ruled Katy Perry’s merchandise distributor, Bravado, had been 'assiduous infringers' of Katie Taylor’s trademark, a detail not mentioned in ABC articles.
- ABC (Article 1) mentions the possibility of Katy Perry facing penalties like compensation or injunctions if found liable, while The Guardian does not discuss potential penalties beyond the trademark ruling.
Source Articles
What does Katy Perry's loss in the High Court mean for her business?
Australian fashion designer Katie Perry has won her long-running trademark battle against pop star Katy Perry, but questions about whether the singer will be able to sell her clothing merchandise as part of any future tours remain.
Breaking: Katie Perry wins High Court trademark case against Katy Perry
Australian fashion designer Katie Perry wins her High Court battle against international pop star Katy Perry in a long-running trademark case.
Katie Perry v Katy Perry: Sydney fashion designer wins 16-year trademark dispute with US pop star
Australia’s high court finds singer’s label and merchandise distributor had been ‘assiduous infringers’ of trademark Follow our Australia news live blog for latest updates Get our breaking news email , free app or daily news podcast The Sydney fashion designer behind the Katie Perry label has won her epic trademark dispute with US pop star Katy Perry, after a legal battle lasting almost 17 years. In a majority decision on Wednesday, Australia’s high court found the designer’s label did not breac
Pop giant’s court loss to Aussie designer
Australian designer Katie Perry has triumphed over global pop sensation Katy Perry in a long-running trademark dispute.
More Lifestyle stories
Funeral of five-year-old Kumanjayi Little Baby and related murder investigation
Australia's property market slowdown due to tax reforms and rate hikes
Death of a 23-year-old man after suspected dog attack at Sydney property
Australia's housing market downturn and falling property prices in 2026
Banks overcharged customers due to mortgage offset account errors, ASIC finds
66th TV Week Logie Awards 2026 ceremony highlights and winners
Latest cross-verified stories
Sydney Swans players linked to sexual assault allegations and club sanctions
Australia vs Bangladesh Test series in 2026, featuring historic upsets and batting struggles
Ukraine targets Wildberries warehouses and Russian infrastructure with drone strikes amid escalating war
Meta trial over social media addiction in children begins in California
Prince Harry and others ordered to pay legal costs to Daily Mail publisher after losing privacy lawsuit
Mass bird deaths linked to H5 bird flu in Australia’s southern states
Browse all stories from March 2026 in the archive.